• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习对创伤性脑损伤患者长期护理需求进行预测建模

Predictive Modeling of Long-Term Care Needs in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Using Machine Learning.

作者信息

Nyam Tee-Tau Eric, Tu Kuan-Chi, Chen Nai-Ching, Wang Che-Chuan, Liu Chung-Feng, Kuo Ching-Lung, Liao Jen-Chieh

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 711, Taiwan.

Center of General Education, Chia Nan University of Phamacy and Science, Tainan 717, Taiwan.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 25;15(1):20. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15010020.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15010020
PMID:39795548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11720696/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) research often focuses on mortality rates or functional recovery, yet the critical need for long-term care among patients dependent on institutional or Respiratory Care Ward (RCW) support remains underexplored. This study aims to address this gap by employing machine learning techniques to develop and validate predictive models that analyze the prognosis of this patient population.

METHOD

Retrospective data from electronic medical records at Chi Mei Medical Center, encompassing 2020 TBI patients admitted to the ICU between January 2016 and December 2021, were collected. A total of 44 features were included, utilizing four machine learning models and various feature combinations based on clinical significance and Spearman correlation coefficients. Predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and validated with the DeLong test and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis.

RESULT

Notably, 236 patients (11.68%) were transferred to long-term care centers. XGBoost with 27 features achieved the highest AUC (0.823), followed by Random Forest with 11 features (0.817), and LightGBM with 44 features (0.813). The DeLong test revealed no significant differences among the best predictive models under various feature combinations. SHAP analysis illustrated a similar distribution of feature importance for the top 11 features in XGBoost, with 27 features, and Random Forest with 11 features.

CONCLUSIONS

Random Forest, with an 11-feature combination, provided clinically meaningful predictive capability, offering early insights into long-term care trends for TBI patients. This model supports proactive planning for institutional or RCW resources, addressing a critical yet often overlooked aspect of TBI care.

摘要

背景

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)研究通常侧重于死亡率或功能恢复,但对于依赖机构或呼吸护理病房(RCW)支持的患者的长期护理的迫切需求仍未得到充分探索。本研究旨在通过采用机器学习技术来开发和验证预测模型,以分析该患者群体的预后,从而填补这一空白。

方法

收集了奇美医学中心电子病历中的回顾性数据,这些数据涵盖了2016年1月至2021年12月期间入住重症监护病房的2020名TBI患者。共纳入44个特征,基于临床意义和斯皮尔曼相关系数,使用四种机器学习模型和各种特征组合。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)评估预测性能,并通过德龙检验和SHAP(SHapley加法解释)分析进行验证。

结果

值得注意的是,236名患者(11.68%)被转移到长期护理中心。具有27个特征的XGBoost模型的AUC最高(0.823),其次是具有11个特征的随机森林模型(0.817),以及具有44个特征的LightGBM模型(0.813)。德龙检验显示,在各种特征组合下,最佳预测模型之间没有显著差异。SHAP分析表明,XGBoost模型中前11个特征、具有27个特征的模型以及具有11个特征的随机森林模型的特征重要性分布相似。

结论

具有11个特征组合的随机森林模型提供了具有临床意义的预测能力,能够为TBI患者的长期护理趋势提供早期见解。该模型支持对机构或RCW资源进行前瞻性规划,解决了TBI护理中一个关键但经常被忽视的方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d05/11720696/ee1199ed7757/diagnostics-15-00020-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d05/11720696/1295d2aa12dd/diagnostics-15-00020-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d05/11720696/4e10d54e03ae/diagnostics-15-00020-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d05/11720696/db27c7a03811/diagnostics-15-00020-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d05/11720696/70aa992fb08a/diagnostics-15-00020-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d05/11720696/ccd608716df3/diagnostics-15-00020-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d05/11720696/ee1199ed7757/diagnostics-15-00020-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d05/11720696/1295d2aa12dd/diagnostics-15-00020-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d05/11720696/4e10d54e03ae/diagnostics-15-00020-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d05/11720696/db27c7a03811/diagnostics-15-00020-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d05/11720696/70aa992fb08a/diagnostics-15-00020-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d05/11720696/ccd608716df3/diagnostics-15-00020-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d05/11720696/ee1199ed7757/diagnostics-15-00020-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictive Modeling of Long-Term Care Needs in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习对创伤性脑损伤患者长期护理需求进行预测建模
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 25;15(1):20. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15010020.
2
Machine Learning Algorithm Predicts Mortality Risk in Intensive Care Unit for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.机器学习算法可预测创伤性脑损伤患者在重症监护病房的死亡风险。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 21;13(18):3016. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13183016.
3
An interpretable machine learning model based on optimal feature selection for identifying CT abnormalities in patients with mild traumatic brain injury.一种基于最优特征选择的可解释机器学习模型,用于识别轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的CT异常。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Apr 3;82:103192. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103192. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Constructing a predictive model for early-onset sepsis in neonatal intensive care unit newborns based on SHapley Additive exPlanations explainable machine learning.基于SHapley加性解释可解释机器学习构建新生儿重症监护病房新生儿早发性败血症的预测模型。
Transl Pediatr. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):1933-1946. doi: 10.21037/tp-24-278. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
5
Learning Models for Traumatic Brain Injury Mortality Prediction on Pediatric Electronic Health Records.基于儿科电子健康记录的创伤性脑损伤死亡率预测学习模型
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 10;13:859068. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.859068. eCollection 2022.
6
SHAP based predictive modeling for 1 year all-cause readmission risk in elderly heart failure patients: feature selection and model interpretation.基于 SHAP 的预测模型对老年心力衰竭患者 1 年全因再入院风险的预测:特征选择和模型解释。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 31;14(1):17728. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67844-7.
7
Prediction of sepsis mortality in ICU patients using machine learning methods.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 患者的败血症死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 16;24(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02630-z.
8
Machine learning for prediction of in-hospital mortality in lung cancer patients admitted to intensive care unit.机器学习在预测 ICU 收治的肺癌患者院内死亡率中的应用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0280606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280606. eCollection 2023.
9
Development and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for assessing the 90-day prognostic outcome of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.基于机器学习的预测模型评估自发性脑出血患者 90 天预后结局的开发与验证。
J Transl Med. 2024 Mar 4;22(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-04896-3.
10
Prediction of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Based on Machine Learning Algorithms.基于机器学习算法预测创伤性脑损伤患者的急性呼吸窘迫综合征。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 15;59(1):171. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010171.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning and deep learning-based approach in smart healthcare: Recent advances, applications, challenges and opportunities.智能医疗保健中基于机器学习和深度学习的方法:最新进展、应用、挑战与机遇。
AIMS Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;11(1):58-109. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024004. eCollection 2024.
2
Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Outcome Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods.使用机器学习方法预测创伤性脑损伤的康复结果
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2023 Oct 2;5(4):100295. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100295. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Machine learning-based model for predicting inpatient mortality in adults with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
基于机器学习的创伤性脑损伤成年患者住院死亡率预测模型:系统评价与Meta分析
Front Neurosci. 2023 Dec 14;17:1285904. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1285904. eCollection 2023.
4
Machine Learning Algorithm Predicts Mortality Risk in Intensive Care Unit for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.机器学习算法可预测创伤性脑损伤患者在重症监护病房的死亡风险。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 21;13(18):3016. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13183016.
5
Predicting return to work after traumatic brain injury using machine learning and administrative data.利用机器学习和管理数据预测创伤性脑损伤后的重返工作情况。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Oct;178:105201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105201. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
6
Machine learning algorithms for predicting outcomes of traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.用于预测创伤性脑损伤预后的机器学习算法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Jul 28;14:262. doi: 10.25259/SNI_312_2023. eCollection 2023.
7
Deep Sedation in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.创伤性脑损伤患者的深度镇静
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2023 May 31;19(2):185-194. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e19. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Mortality Prediction in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using Traditional and Machine Learning Algorithms.使用传统和机器学习算法预测严重创伤性脑损伤的死亡率。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Jul;40(13-14):1366-1375. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0221. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
9
Machine Learning to Predict Three Types of Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury Using Data at Admission: A Multi-Center Study for Development and Validation.机器学习使用入院时的数据预测创伤性脑损伤后的三种结局:一项用于开发和验证的多中心研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Aug;40(15-16):1694-1706. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0515. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
10
Care patterns and predictors of community residence among older patients after hospital discharge for traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者出院后社区居住的护理模式和预测因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jun;71(6):1806-1818. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18308. Epub 2023 Feb 24.