• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估正强化和负强化对任务依从性的单独和共同影响。

Evaluating the separate and combined effects of positive and negative reinforcement on task compliance.

机构信息

Munroe-Meyer Institute, University Of Nebraska Medical Center, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Spring;44(1):175-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-175.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-175
PMID:21541137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3050464/
Abstract

Positive and negative reinforcement are effective for treating escape-maintained destructive behavior. The current study evaluated the separate and combined effects of these contingencies to increase task compliance. Results showed that a combination of positive and negative reinforcement was most effective for increasing compliance.

摘要

正强化和负强化对治疗逃避维持的破坏性行为是有效的。本研究评估了这些条件的单独和组合效应对提高任务依从性的影响。结果表明，正强化和负强化的组合对提高依从性最有效。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the separate and combined effects of positive and negative reinforcement on task compliance.评估正强化和负强化对任务依从性的单独和共同影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Spring;44(1):175-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-175.
2
Reducing covert self-injurious behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement through a variable momentary DRO procedure.通过可变瞬间 DRO 程序减少自动强化维持的隐蔽性自我伤害行为。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Spring;45(1):179-84. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-179.
3
Choices between positive and negative reinforcement during treatment for escape-maintained behavior.逃避维持行为治疗期间在正强化和负强化之间的选择。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):521-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-521.
4
On the establishing and reinforcing effects of termination of demands for destructive behavior maintained by positive and negative reinforcement.关于对由正强化和负强化维持的破坏性行为的需求终止的建立和强化效果。
Res Dev Disabil. 1998 Sep-Oct;19(5):395-407. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(98)00013-4.
5
Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior.逃避行为治疗中阳性强化与阴性强化之间的竞争
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Fall;32(3):285-96. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-285.
6
Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.进一步研究影响对正强化与负强化偏好的因素。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Spring;40(1):25-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.151-05.
7
Noncontingent escape as treatment for self-injurious behavior maintained by negative reinforcement.非连续性逃避作为由负强化维持的自伤行为的治疗方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Spring;28(1):15-26. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-15.
8
A comparison of positive and negative reinforcement for compliance to treat problem behavior maintained by escape.对通过逃避维持的问题行为进行依从性治疗时正强化与负强化的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Sep;48(3):563-74. doi: 10.1002/jaba.216. Epub 2015 May 13.
9
Decreasing excessive functional communication responses while treating destructive behavior using response restriction.在使用反应限制治疗破坏性行为时减少过度的功能性沟通反应。
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Nov;35(11):2614-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.06.024. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
10
Analysis of the reinforcement and extinction components in DRO contingencies with self-injury.对伴有自伤行为的区别性消退（DRO）情境中强化和消退成分的分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):143-56. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-143.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing water intake and walking with a self-management intervention using negative and positive reinforcement.通过使用正负强化的自我管理干预措施来增加饮水量并进行步行锻炼。
Postep Psychiatr Neurol. 2023 Dec;32(4):181-187. doi: 10.5114/ppn.2023.134454. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
2
An analysis of modifications to the three-step guided compliance procedure necessary to achieve compliance among preschool children.分析使学龄前儿童达到合规性所需的三步引导性遵从程序修改。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Spring;45(1):121-30. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-121.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of variable-time delivery of food items and praise on problem behavior reinforced by escape.变量时间提供食物和表扬对逃避强化问题行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Fall;43(3):425-35. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-425.
2
Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.进一步研究影响对正强化与负强化偏好的因素。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Spring;40(1):25-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.151-05.
3
Choices between positive and negative reinforcement during treatment for escape-maintained behavior.逃避维持行为治疗期间在正强化和负强化之间的选择。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):521-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-521.
4
Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior.逃避行为治疗中阳性强化与阴性强化之间的竞争
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Fall;32(3):285-96. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-285.
5
Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.一项简短刺激偏好评估的评价
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.
6
The use of positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape-maintained destructive behavior.正负强化在逃避维持的破坏性行为治疗中的应用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Summer;30(2):279-97; quiz 297-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-279.