• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年家庭成员在提供社会资源和促进遗传性癌症综合征家庭的癌症筛查方面的重要性。

The importance of older family members in providing social resources and promoting cancer screening in families with a hereditary cancer syndrome.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Memphis, 224 Browning Hall, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2011 Dec;51(6):833-42. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr049. Epub 2011 May 11.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnr049
PMID:21562055
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3220664/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the role of older family members as providers of social resources within familial network systems affected by an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Respondents who previously participated in a study that involved genetic counseling and testing for Lynch syndrome and their family network members were invited to participate in a onetime telephone interview about family communication.

RESULTS

A total of 206 respondents from 33 families identified 2,051 social relationships (dyads). Nineteen percent of the respondents and 25% of the network members were older (≥60 years). Younger respondents (≤59 years) were more likely to nominate older network members as providers of social resources than younger members: instrumental support (odds ratio [OR] = 1.68), emotional support (OR = 1.71), help in crisis situation (OR = 2.04), and dependability when needed (OR = 2.15). Compared with younger network members, older members were more likely to be listed as encouragers of colon cancer screening by both younger (OR = 3.40) and older respondents (OR = 1.90) independent of whether support exchange occurred in the relationship.

IMPLICATIONS

Engaging older network members in health interventions to facilitate screening behaviors and emotional well-being of younger members within families affected by inherited conditions may be beneficial. Findings can be used to empower older individuals about their important social roles in enhancing the well-being of their family members and to inform younger individuals about their older relatives' resourcefulness to facilitate positive social interactions.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了在受遗传性癌症易感性综合征影响的家族网络系统中,年长家庭成员作为社会资源提供者的作用。

设计和方法

先前参加过林奇综合征遗传咨询和检测研究的受访者及其家族网络成员被邀请参加一次性电话访谈,内容涉及家庭沟通。

结果

来自 33 个家庭的 206 名受访者共确定了 2051 个社会关系(二人关系)。19%的受访者和 25%的网络成员年龄较大(≥60 岁)。较年轻的受访者(≤59 岁)比年轻的网络成员更有可能提名年长的网络成员作为社会资源的提供者:工具性支持(比值比 [OR] = 1.68)、情感支持(OR = 1.71)、危机情况下的帮助(OR = 2.04)和需要时的可信赖性(OR = 2.15)。与年轻的网络成员相比,年长的网络成员更有可能被较年轻(OR = 3.40)和年长的受访者(OR = 1.90)列为结肠癌筛查的鼓励者,无论关系中是否存在支持交换。

意义

让年长的网络成员参与健康干预,以促进受遗传性疾病影响的家庭中年轻成员的筛查行为和情绪健康,可能是有益的。这些发现可用于增强年长个体对其在增强家庭成员幸福感方面的重要社会角色的认识,并告知年轻个体其年长亲属的足智多谋,以促进积极的社会互动。

相似文献

1
The importance of older family members in providing social resources and promoting cancer screening in families with a hereditary cancer syndrome.老年家庭成员在提供社会资源和促进遗传性癌症综合征家庭的癌症筛查方面的重要性。
Gerontologist. 2011 Dec;51(6):833-42. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr049. Epub 2011 May 11.
2
Factors affecting encouragement of relatives among families with Lynch syndrome to seek medical assessment.影响林奇综合征家族中鼓励亲属寻求医学评估的因素。
Fam Cancer. 2011 Dec;10(4):649-54. doi: 10.1007/s10689-011-9462-x.
3
Patterns of family communication and preferred resources for sharing information among families with a Lynch syndrome diagnosis.林奇综合征患者家庭的沟通模式及信息分享偏好资源。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Nov;101(11):2011-2017. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.07.021. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
4
Communication, encouragement, and cancer screening in families with and without mutations for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a pilot study.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌有无突变家庭中的沟通、鼓励与癌症筛查:一项试点研究。
Genet Med. 2009 Oct;11(10):728-34. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b3f42d.
5
Scoping the family history: assessment of Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) in primary care settings--a primer for nurse practitioners.梳理家族病史:基层医疗环境中林奇综合征(遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌)的评估——执业护士入门指南
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008 Feb;20(2):76-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00282.x.
6
Stakeholder Perspectives on Overcoming Barriers to Cascade Testing in Lynch Syndrome: A Qualitative Study.利益相关者对克服林奇综合征级联检测障碍的观点:一项定性研究。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Dec;13(12):1037-1046. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0141. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
7
Direct contact in inviting high-risk members of hereditary colon cancer families to genetic counselling and DNA testing.直接接触遗传性结肠癌家族的高危成员,邀请他们接受遗传咨询和DNA检测。
J Med Genet. 2007 Nov;44(11):732-8. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2007.051581. Epub 2007 Jul 14.
8
How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study.家庭如何就遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌基因检测进行沟通:一项定性研究的结果
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2003 May 15;119C(1):78-86. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.10010.
9
Communicating cancer risk within an African context: experiences, disclosure patterns and uptake rates following genetic testing for Lynch syndrome.在非洲背景下传递癌症风险:林奇综合征遗传检测后的经验、披露模式和接受率。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jul;92(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
10
Knowledge and Uptake of Genetic Counseling and Colonoscopic Screening Among Individuals at Increased Risk for Lynch Syndrome and their Endoscopists from the Family Health Promotion Project.家庭健康促进项目中林奇综合征风险增加个体及其内镜医师对遗传咨询和结肠镜筛查的认知与接受情况
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;111(2):285-93. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.397. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of the levels, implementation strategies, enablers, and barriers to cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening among migrant populations in selected English-speaking high-income countries.对选定的英语高收入国家移民人群中宫颈癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查的水平、实施策略、促进因素和障碍的范围审查。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 14;20(8):e0329854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329854. eCollection 2025.
2
Family Communication of Genetic Risk: What is it and Why does it Matter?遗传风险的家庭沟通:是什么以及为何重要?
Acta Med Philipp. 2025 Jun 30;59(8):7-15. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.9721. eCollection 2025.
3
Social Robots for Meaningful Seated Activities: Acceptance & Use by Older Adults.用于有意义的坐姿活动的社交机器人:老年人的接受度与使用情况
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 4;12(13):1334. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131334.
4
Health-related roles of older generations in families with inherited genetic conditions: a scoping review.有遗传疾病家庭中老一辈人的健康相关角色:一项范围综述
J Community Genet. 2024 Aug;15(4):351-361. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00713-y. Epub 2024 May 25.
5
The structure of emotional support networks in families affected by Lynch syndrome.受林奇综合征影响的家庭中情感支持网络的结构。
Netw Sci (Camb Univ Press). 2020 Dec;8(4):492-507. doi: 10.1017/nws.2020.13. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
6
Role of older generations in the family's adjustment to Huntington disease.老一辈在家庭对亨廷顿舞蹈症的适应过程中的作用。
J Community Genet. 2021 Jul;12(3):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00523-6. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
7
Uptake and predictors of colonoscopy use in family members not participating in cascade genetic testing for Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征家系中未参与级联遗传检测的家庭成员接受结肠镜检查的情况及其影响因素。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 29;10(1):15959. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72938-z.
8
The role of maternal social networks on the outcomes of a home-based childhood obesity prevention pilot intervention.母亲社交网络对一项基于家庭的儿童肥胖预防试点干预结果的作用。
J Soc Struct. 2019 Aug;20(3):7-28. doi: 10.21307/joss-2019-004. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
9
Family Health Leaders: Lessons on Living with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome across Generations.家庭健康领导者:跨越世代的李-佛美尼综合征生活经验教训。
Fam Process. 2020 Dec;59(4):1648-1663. doi: 10.1111/famp.12497. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
10
Does family communication matter? Exploring knowledge of breast cancer genetics in cancer families.家庭沟通重要吗?探索癌症家族中乳腺癌遗传学知识。
J Community Genet. 2019 Oct;10(4):481-487. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00413-y. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Social influence and motivation to change health behaviors among Mexican-origin adults: implications for diet and physical activity.社会影响和改变健康行为的动机在墨西哥裔成年人中:对饮食和体育活动的影响。
Am J Health Promot. 2012 Jan-Feb;26(3):176-9. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.100107-QUAN-2.
2
Grandparents Raising Grandchildren in the United States: Changing Family Forms, Stagnant Social Policies.美国祖父母抚养孙辈:不断变化的家庭形式,停滞不前的社会政策。
J Soc Soc Policy. 2008;7:53-69.
3
Motivation for health screening: evaluation of social influence among Mexican-American adults.健康筛查的动机:墨西哥裔美国成年人社会影响的评估。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.028.
4
Characteristics of health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families at risk of hereditary cancer: implications for family health communication interventions.遗传性癌症高危家庭中健康信息的收集者、传播者和阻碍者的特征:对家庭健康沟通干预的启示
Am J Public Health. 2009 Dec;99(12):2203-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.154096. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
5
Social sharing of genetic information in the family: a study on hereditary breast and ovarian cancers.家庭中遗传信息的社会共享:遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的研究。
J Health Psychol. 2009 Oct;14(7):855-60. doi: 10.1177/1359105309340981.
6
Communication, encouragement, and cancer screening in families with and without mutations for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a pilot study.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌有无突变家庭中的沟通、鼓励与癌症筛查:一项试点研究。
Genet Med. 2009 Oct;11(10):728-34. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b3f42d.
7
The impact of familial environment on depression scores after genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.癌症易感性基因检测后家庭环境对抑郁评分的影响。
Clin Genet. 2009 Jan;75(1):43-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01104.x. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
8
Sisters in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: communal coping, social integration, and psychological well-being.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌家族中的姐妹:共同应对、社会融入与心理健康。
Psychooncology. 2008 Aug;17(8):812-21. doi: 10.1002/pon.1373.
9
Guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis cancer).林奇综合征(遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌)临床管理指南
J Med Genet. 2007 Jun;44(6):353-62. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2007.048991. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
10
Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome: a systematic review.林奇综合征遗传易感性个体的护理建议:一项系统综述
JAMA. 2006 Sep 27;296(12):1507-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.12.1507.