• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定在整个欧洲有效沟通食品风险和益处的策略:FoodRisC 项目的设计和概念框架。

Development of strategies for effective communication of food risks and benefits across Europe: design and conceptual framework of the FoodRisC project.

机构信息

Department of Information Systems and Computing, Brunel University, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2011 May 13;11:308. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-308.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-11-308
PMID:21569458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3107181/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

European consumers are faced with a myriad of food related risk and benefit information and it is regularly left up to the consumer to interpret these, often conflicting, pieces of information as a coherent message. This conflict is especially apparent in times of food crises and can have major public health implications. Scientific results and risk assessments cannot always be easily communicated into simple guidelines and advice that non-scientists like the public or the media can easily understand especially when there is conflicting, uncertain or complex information about a particular food or aspects thereof. The need for improved strategies and tools for communication about food risks and benefits is therefore paramount. The FoodRisC project ("Food Risk Communication - Perceptions and communication of food risks/benefits across Europe: development of effective communication strategies") aims to address this issue. The FoodRisC project will examine consumer perceptions and investigate how people acquire and use information in food domains in order to develop targeted strategies for food communication across Europe.

METHODS/DESIGN: This project consists of 6 research work packages which, using qualitative and quantitative methodologies, are focused on development of a framework for investigating food risk/benefit issues across Europe, exploration of the role of new and traditional media in food communication and testing of the framework in order to develop evidence based communication strategies and tools. The main outcome of the FoodRisC project will be a toolkit to enable coherent communication of food risk/benefit messages in Europe. The toolkit will integrate theoretical models and new measurement paradigms as well as building on social marketing approaches around consumer segmentation. Use of the toolkit and guides will assist policy makers, food authorities and other end users in developing common approaches to communicating coherent messages to consumers in Europe.

DISCUSSION

The FoodRisC project offers a unique approach to the investigation of food risk/benefit communication. The effective spread of food risk/benefit information will assist initiatives aimed at reducing the burden of food-related illness and disease, reducing the economic impact of food crises and ensuring that confidence in safe and nutritious food is fostered and maintained in Europe.

摘要

背景

欧洲消费者面临着无数与食品相关的风险和利益信息,通常需要消费者将这些相互冲突的信息解读为一个连贯的信息。这种冲突在食品危机时期尤为明显,可能对公众健康产生重大影响。科学结果和风险评估并不总能轻易转化为简单的准则和建议,让公众或媒体等非科学家理解,尤其是当涉及某种食品或其某些方面的信息存在冲突、不确定或复杂时。因此,需要改进食品风险和利益沟通策略和工具。“FoodRisC 项目(“食品风险沟通 - 欧洲对食品风险/利益的看法和沟通:制定有效的沟通策略”)旨在解决这个问题。该项目将研究消费者的看法,并调查人们如何在食品领域获取和使用信息,以便为整个欧洲的食品沟通制定有针对性的策略。

方法/设计:该项目由 6 个研究工作包组成,使用定性和定量方法,专注于开发一个跨欧洲调查食品风险/利益问题的框架,探索新的和传统媒体在食品沟通中的作用,并测试该框架,以制定基于证据的沟通策略和工具。FoodRisC 项目的主要成果将是一个工具包,使欧洲能够连贯地传达食品风险/利益信息。该工具包将整合理论模型和新的测量范式,以及围绕消费者细分的社会营销方法。该工具包和指南的使用将协助政策制定者、食品当局和其他最终用户制定向欧洲消费者传达连贯信息的共同方法。

讨论

FoodRisC 项目为食品风险/利益沟通的研究提供了一种独特的方法。有效传播食品风险/利益信息将有助于减少与食品相关的疾病和疾病负担、降低食品危机的经济影响,并确保在欧洲培养和维护对安全和营养食品的信心的倡议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78a6/3107181/36ed83fbbe1b/1471-2458-11-308-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78a6/3107181/ba5c3d57ae2f/1471-2458-11-308-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78a6/3107181/c4182ced6d49/1471-2458-11-308-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78a6/3107181/36ed83fbbe1b/1471-2458-11-308-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78a6/3107181/ba5c3d57ae2f/1471-2458-11-308-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78a6/3107181/c4182ced6d49/1471-2458-11-308-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78a6/3107181/36ed83fbbe1b/1471-2458-11-308-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of strategies for effective communication of food risks and benefits across Europe: design and conceptual framework of the FoodRisC project.制定在整个欧洲有效沟通食品风险和益处的策略:FoodRisC 项目的设计和概念框架。
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 13;11:308. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-308.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
How can scientists bring research to use: the HENVINET experience.科学家如何将研究付诸实际应用:HENVINET 的经验。
Environ Health. 2012 Jun 28;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-S1-S2.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
Communication in a Human biomonitoring study: Focus group work, public engagement and lessons learnt in 17 European countries.一项人体生物监测研究中的沟通:焦点小组工作、公众参与以及在17个欧洲国家获得的经验教训。
Environ Res. 2015 Aug;141:31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
7
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
8
Evidence for success in health promotion: suggestions for improvement.健康促进成功的证据:改进建议。
Health Educ Res. 1996 Sep;11(3):367-76. doi: 10.1093/her/11.3.367.
9
Improving food safety in the domestic environment: the need for a transdisciplinary approach.改善家庭环境中的食品安全:跨学科方法的必要性。
Risk Anal. 2005 Jun;25(3):503-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00618.x.
10
Toward public health nutrition strategies in the European Union to implement food based dietary guidelines and to enhance healthier lifestyles.迈向欧盟的公共卫生营养战略,以实施基于食物的膳食指南并促进更健康的生活方式。
Public Health Nutr. 2001 Apr;4(2A):307-24. doi: 10.1017/s1368980001001562.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the impact of internet communication quality in human resource management on the productivity of construction projects.评估人力资源管理中互联网通信质量对建设项目生产率的影响。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 26;10(7):e28500. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28500. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
2
Theoretical and practical aspects of risk communication in food safety: A review study.食品安全风险沟通的理论与实践层面:一项综述研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 11;9(7):e18141. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18141. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
'Don't Worry, Honey: It's Cooked': Addressing Food Risk during Pregnancy on Facebook Italian Posts.

本文引用的文献

1
BRAFO tiered approach for Benefit-Risk Assessment of Foods.食品的获益-风险评估的 BRAFO 分层方法。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl 4:S684-98. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.05.049. Epub 2010 May 28.
2
Communicating risks and benefits from fish consumption: impact on Belgian consumers' perception and intention to eat fish.传达食用鱼类的风险和益处:对比利时消费者对鱼类的认知及食用意愿的影响。
Risk Anal. 2008 Aug;28(4):951-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01075.x. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
3
European public perceptions of food risk: cross-national and methodological comparisons.
“别担心,亲爱的:食物已煮熟”:解读脸书上意大利语帖子中关于孕期食物风险的内容
Foods. 2021 Oct 17;10(10):2484. doi: 10.3390/foods10102484.
4
Perceptions about mercury and lead in fish consumed in Lake Albert fishing communities Uganda.乌干达艾伯特湖捕鱼社区食用鱼类中汞和铅的认知情况。
Cogent Food Agric. 2016 Dec 31;2(1):1220344. doi: 10.1080/23311932.2016.1220344. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
欧洲公众对食品风险的认知:跨国及方法学比较
Risk Anal. 2008 Apr;28(2):311-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01021.x.
4
Probabilistic intake assessment of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and omega-3 fatty acids through fish consumption.通过食用鱼类对多溴二苯醚和ω-3脂肪酸进行概率摄入量评估。
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2008 Feb;52(2):250-7. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200700109.
5
Probabilistic intake assessment of multiple compounds as a tool to quantify the nutritional-toxicological conflict related to seafood consumption.多种化合物的概率性摄入量评估作为量化与海鲜消费相关的营养 - 毒理学冲突的工具。
Chemosphere. 2008 Apr;71(6):1056-66. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.025. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
6
Gender differences in food choice: the contribution of health beliefs and dieting.食物选择中的性别差异:健康观念与节食的作用
Ann Behav Med. 2004 Apr;27(2):107-16. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_5.
7
Socioeconomic determinants of health- and food safety-related risk perceptions.健康及食品安全相关风险认知的社会经济决定因素
Risk Anal. 2001 Apr;21(2):307-17. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.212113.