Suppr超能文献

局部麻醉的分子机制:综述

Molecular mechanisms of local anesthesia: a review.

作者信息

Butterworth J F, Strichartz G R

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Wake Forest University Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1990 Apr;72(4):711-34. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199004000-00022.

Abstract

Impulse block by LA occurs through the inhibition of voltage-gated Na+ channels. Both protonated and neutral LAs can inhibit Na+ channels though interference with the conformational changes that underly the activation process (the sequence of events that occurs as channels progress from the closed resting state to the open conducting state). The occlusion of open channels contributes little to the overall inhibition. Local anesthetic inhibition of Na+ currents increases with repetitive depolarizations in a process called phasic block. Phasic block represents increased LA binding, either because more channels become accessible during depolarization or because the channel conformations favored by depolarization bind LA with higher affinity. The details of phasic block are dependent on LA chemistry: certain LAs bind and dissociate quite rapidly, others act more slowly; some LAs interact effectively with closed states that occur intermediately between resting and open states, others favor the open channel, and still others have a higher affinity for inactivated states. Channel activation accelerates LA binding, and LAs may bind more tightly to activated and inactivated than to resting channels. In this regard, both the modulated receptor and the guarded receptor hypotheses are valid. In binding to activated and inactivated channels, LAs prevent the conformational changes of activation and antagonize the binding of activator agents that poise channels in activated, open states. These reciprocal actions are one aspect of the concerted conformational rearrangements that occur throughout Na+ channels during gating. The LA binding site may exist in the channel's pore, at the membrane-protein interface, or within the protein subunits of the channel. Judging from its susceptibility to intracellular proteases and its accessibility to LAs with limited membrane permeability (i.e., quaternary LAs in the cytoplasm), the site lies nearer to the cytoplasmic than the external surface of the membrane. Nevertheless, protons in the external medium influence the dissociation of LA from the closed channel. Binding of LAs at the inhibitory site is weak and loose. If one accounts for the membrane-concentrating effects of LA hydrophobicity that are expressed as membrane: buffer partition coefficients equal to 10(2)-10(4), then the apparent LA affinities are low. The equilibrium dissociation constants calculated on the basis of free drug in the membrane are 1-10 mM, with a correspondingly weak binding to the inhibitory LA site. The stereospecificity of LA action is also relatively nonselective, suggesting a loose fit between ligand and binding site.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

局部麻醉药(LA)引起的冲动阻断是通过抑制电压门控性钠离子通道实现的。质子化和中性的局部麻醉药均可通过干扰构成激活过程(即通道从静息关闭状态转变为开放导通状态时发生的一系列事件)的构象变化来抑制钠离子通道。开放通道的堵塞对整体抑制作用贡献不大。在一个称为相性阻滞的过程中,局部麻醉药对钠电流的抑制作用会随着重复去极化而增强。相性阻滞表现为局部麻醉药结合增加,这要么是因为在去极化过程中有更多通道可供结合,要么是因为去极化所青睐的通道构象与局部麻醉药的结合亲和力更高。相性阻滞的细节取决于局部麻醉药的化学性质:某些局部麻醉药结合和解离相当迅速,另一些则作用较慢;一些局部麻醉药能有效与静息态和开放态之间的中间关闭态相互作用,另一些则倾向于开放通道,还有一些对失活态具有更高的亲和力。通道激活会加速局部麻醉药的结合,并且局部麻醉药与激活态和失活态通道的结合可能比与静息通道的结合更紧密。在这方面,调制受体假说和防护受体假说都是成立的。在与激活态和失活态通道结合时,局部麻醉药可防止激活过程中的构象变化,并拮抗使通道处于激活开放状态的激活剂的结合。这些相互作用是门控过程中整个钠离子通道发生的协同构象重排的一个方面。局部麻醉药的结合位点可能存在于通道孔内、膜 - 蛋白界面或通道的蛋白亚基内。从其对细胞内蛋白酶的敏感性以及对膜通透性有限的局部麻醉药(即细胞质中的季铵类局部麻醉药)的可及性判断,该位点位于膜的细胞质侧而非外侧附近。然而,细胞外介质中的质子会影响局部麻醉药从关闭通道的解离。局部麻醉药在抑制位点的结合较弱且不牢固。如果考虑到局部麻醉药疏水性所表现出的膜浓缩效应,其膜与缓冲液的分配系数等于10² - 10⁴,那么局部麻醉药的表观亲和力较低。基于膜中游离药物计算的平衡解离常数为1 - 10 mM,与抑制性局部麻醉药位点的结合相应较弱。局部麻醉药作用的立体特异性也相对缺乏选择性,这表明配体与结合位点之间的契合较为松散。(摘要截取自400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验