• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 LabMELD 的器官分配增加了肝移植的总费用:单中心经验。

LabMELD-based organ allocation increases total costs of liver transplantation: a single-center experience.

机构信息

Department for General and Transplantation Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2011 Sep-Oct;25(5):E558-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01483.x. Epub 2011 May 17.

DOI:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01483.x
PMID:21585550
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In 2006, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)-based allocation was implemented in the Eurotransplant (ET) region. Sick patients, who in general require more resources, are prioritized. In this analysis, the effect of MELD on costs for liver transplantation (LTx) was assessed.

METHODS

Total costs for LTx before and after implementation of MELD were identified in 256 patients from January 2005-December 2007. Forty-nine patients (Re-LTx, HU listings, and 30-d mortality) were excluded from further analysis. The costs of LTx in 207 patients have been correlated with their corresponding labMELD; 84 and 123 LTx before and after implementation of MELD were compared, and patient survival was monitored.

RESULTS

A positive correlation exists between labMELD and costs (r(2) = 0.28; p < 0.05). Only nominal correlation existed between the Child-Pugh classification and costs. The labMELD scores can be stratified into four groups (I: 6-10, II: 11-18, III: 19-24, and IV: >24), with an increase of €15.672 ± 2.233 between each group (p < 0.05). Recipients' labMELD at the time of LTx increased significantly in the MELD-based allocation system. Costs increased by €11.650/patient (p < 0.05), while median survival decreased from 1219 to 869 d (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

LabMELD-based allocation increased total costs of LTx. In accordance with other studies, the sickest patients need the most resources.

摘要

简介

2006 年,欧洲肝移植组织(ET)区域实施了终末期肝病模型(MELD)分配。优先考虑一般需要更多资源的患病患者。在这项分析中,评估了 MELD 对肝移植(LTx)成本的影响。

方法

从 2005 年 1 月至 2007 年 12 月,确定了 256 例患者在实施 MELD 前后的 LTx 总费用。49 例患者(再 LTx、HU 名单和 30 天死亡率)被排除在进一步分析之外。207 例患者的 LTx 费用与其相应的 labMELD 相关;比较了 MELD 实施前后的 84 例和 123 例 LTx,并监测了患者的生存情况。

结果

labMELD 与成本之间存在正相关(r²=0.28;p<0.05)。Child-Pugh 分类与成本之间仅存在名义上的相关性。labMELD 评分可分为四组(I:6-10,II:11-18,III:19-24,IV:>24),每组之间增加 15.672 欧元±2.233 欧元(p<0.05)。在基于 MELD 的分配系统中,LTx 时受体的 labMELD 显著增加。每位患者的成本增加了 11650 欧元(p<0.05),而中位生存期从 1219 天降至 869 天(p<0.05)。

结论

基于 labMELD 的分配增加了 LTx 的总费用。与其他研究一致,最病重的患者需要最多的资源。

相似文献

1
LabMELD-based organ allocation increases total costs of liver transplantation: a single-center experience.基于 LabMELD 的器官分配增加了肝移植的总费用:单中心经验。
Clin Transplant. 2011 Sep-Oct;25(5):E558-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01483.x. Epub 2011 May 17.
2
The model for end-stage liver disease allocation system for liver transplantation saves lives, but increases morbidity and cost: a prospective outcome analysis.终末期肝病模型肝移植分配系统可拯救生命,但会增加发病率和成本:前瞻性结局分析。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Jun;17(6):674-84. doi: 10.1002/lt.22228.
3
Multicentric evaluation of model for end-stage liver disease-based allocation and survival after liver transplantation in Germany--limitations of the 'sickest first'-concept.德国基于终末期肝病模型的肝移植分配与生存多中心评估——“病情最重者优先”概念的局限性
Transpl Int. 2011 Jan;24(1):91-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2010.01161.x. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
4
Model for end-stage liver disease exceptions in the context of the French model for end-stage liver disease score-based liver allocation system.终末期肝病模型在法国终末期肝病评分为基础的肝脏分配系统中的例外情况。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Oct;17(10):1137-51. doi: 10.1002/lt.22363.
5
Developments in pediatric liver transplantation since implementation of the new allocation rules in Eurotransplant.自欧洲移植组织实施新的分配规则以来小儿肝移植的发展情况。
Clin Transplant. 2014 Sep;28(9):1061-8. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12420. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
6
The sickest first? Disparities with model for end-stage liver disease-based organ allocation: one region's experience.先救治病情最重的患者?基于终末期肝病模型的器官分配存在的差异:一个地区的经验。
Liver Transpl. 2003 Nov;9(11):1211-5. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50192.
7
An outcome comparison between primary liver transplantation and retransplantation based on the pretransplant MELD score.
Transpl Int. 2006 Apr;19(4):282-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00281.x.
8
Same quality - higher price? The paradox of allocation: the first national single center analysis after the implementation of the new Swiss transplantation law: the ICU view.相同质量——更高价格?分配悖论:新瑞士移植法实施后的首个全国单中心分析:ICU 观点。
Clin Transplant. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):921-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01364.x. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
9
Impact of the MELD allocation after its implementation in liver transplantation.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分系统在肝移植中应用后的影响。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;46(7-8):941-8. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2011.568521. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
10
Liver transplantation cost in the model for end-stage liver disease era: looking beyond the transplant admission.终末期肝病时代模型中的肝移植成本:超越移植入院的考量
Liver Transpl. 2009 Oct;15(10):1270-7. doi: 10.1002/lt.21802.

引用本文的文献

1
The BAR Score Predicts and Stratifies Outcomes Following Liver Retransplantation: Insights From a Retrospective Cohort Study.BAR 评分可预测和分层肝移植后结局:来自回顾性队列研究的见解。
Transpl Int. 2024 Jan 16;37:12104. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.12104. eCollection 2024.
2
Progress of new-onset diabetes after liver and kidney transplantation.肝肾移植术后新发糖尿病的研究进展。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 8;14:1091843. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1091843. eCollection 2023.
3
Patients Benefit from Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma beyond Milan Criteria without Harming the Health Care System.
肝细胞癌患者接受超出米兰标准的肝移植治疗可从中获益,且不会损害医疗保健系统。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;14(5):1136. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051136.
4
[Complication management after liver transplantation. Increasing patient safety by standardized approach and interdisciplinary cooperation].[肝移植术后并发症管理。通过标准化方法和跨学科合作提高患者安全性]
Chirurg. 2015 Feb;86(2):139-45. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2883-y.
5
Effect of delayed CNI-based immunosuppression with Advagraf® on liver function after MELD-based liver transplantation [IMUTECT].基于终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分的肝移植术后使用Advagraf®进行延迟的基于钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)的免疫抑制对肝功能的影响[IMUTECT研究]
BMC Surg. 2014 Sep 1;14:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-64.
6
The MELD score predicts the short-term and overall survival after liver transplantation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis or autoimmune liver diseases.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分可预测原发性硬化性胆管炎或自身免疫性肝病患者肝移植后的短期和总体生存率。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Dec;399(8):1001-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1237-z. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
7
Prediction of postoperative mortality in liver transplantation in the era of MELD-based liver allocation: a multivariate analysis.基于 MELD 评分的肝分配时代肝移植术后死亡率的预测:多变量分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 6;9(6):e98782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098782. eCollection 2014.