Department of Hyperthermia, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Hyperthermia. 2011;27(4):399-404. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2010.534528.
The Health Council of the Netherlands (HCN) and other organisations hold the basic assumption that induced electric current and the generation and absorption of heat in biological material caused by radiofrequency electromagnetic fields are the only causal effects with possible adverse consequences for human health that have been scientifically established to date. Hence, the exposure guidelines for the 10 MHz-10 GHz frequency range are based on avoiding adverse effects of increased temperatures that may occur of the entire human body at a specific absorption rate (SAR) level above 4 W/kg. During the workshop on Thermal Aspects of Radio Frequency Exposure on 11-12 January 2010 in Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, the question was raised whether there would be a practical advantage in shifting from expressing the exposure limits in SAR to expressing them in terms of a maximum allowable temperature increase. This would mean defining adverse time-temperature thresholds. In this paper, the HCN discusses the need for this, considering six points: consistency, applicability, quantification, causality, comprehensibility and acceptability. The HCN concludes that it seems unlikely that a change of dosimetric quantity will help us forward in the discussion on the scientific controversies regarding the existence or non-existence of non-thermal effects in humans following long duration, low intensity exposure to electromagnetic fields. Therefore, the HCN favours maintaining the current approach of basic restrictions and reference levels being expressed as SAR and in V/m or µT, respectively.
荷兰健康委员会(HCN)和其他组织持有这样一个基本假设,即射频电磁场引起的生物电流以及生物材料中热的产生和吸收是迄今为止在科学上确定的对人类健康可能产生不利后果的唯一因果效应。因此,10MHz-10GHz 频率范围内的暴露指南是基于避免可能发生的全身温度升高的不利影响,在特定吸收率(SAR)水平超过 4W/kg 时可能会出现这种情况。在美国马里兰州盖瑟斯堡于 2010 年 1 月 11 日至 12 日举行的射频暴露热方面研讨会上,提出了一个问题,即从以 SAR 表达暴露限值转换为以最大允许温升来表达暴露限值是否具有实际优势。这意味着要定义不利的时间-温度阈值。在本文中,HCN 从一致性、适用性、量化、因果关系、可理解性和可接受性这六个方面讨论了这种必要性。HCN 的结论是,改变剂量学量不太可能有助于我们在讨论中取得进展,即关于人类在长时间、低强度暴露于电磁场后是否存在非热效应的科学争议。因此,HCN 倾向于维持当前的方法,即将基本限制和参考水平分别表示为 SAR 和 V/m 或 µT。