• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利多卡因碱化用于口腔内神经阻滞对注射时疼痛及麻醉起效速度的影响。

Effect of alkalinisation of lignocaine for intraoral nerve block on pain during injection, and speed of onset of anaesthesia.

作者信息

Kashyap Vinay Mohan, Desai Rajendra, Reddy Praveen B, Menon Suresh

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vydehi Institute of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, India.

出版信息

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Dec;49(8):e72-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.04.068. Epub 2011 May 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.04.068
PMID:21592633
Abstract

Injections of lignocaine as local anaesthetic for pain control in oral and maxillofacial surgery can themselves be painful. The time of onset of anaesthesia is from 3 to 5 min. Sodium bicarbonate has been used worldwide to reduce both these drawbacks to the injection, so making procedures more acceptable. This randomised prospective trial of 100 patients aged 18-55 years who were given 3 nerve blocks (inferior alveolar, lingual, and long buccal) was designed to assess the effect of alkalinisation of the lignocaine solution with sodium bicarbonate. All patients were given 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline 1:80,000 and 50 patients were randomly allocated to be given 8.4% sodium bicarbonate in a 1/10 dilution. Pain was measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS). No patient given the injection with sodium bicarbonate complained of pain, compared with 39/50 (78%) not given sodium bicarbonate (p<0.0001). The mean (SD) time (seconds) to onset of local anaesthesia in the group given sodium bicarbonate was 34.4 (9.8) compared with 109.8 (31.6) in the control group (p<0.001). Our results have confirmed the efficacy of the alkalinised local anaesthetic solution in reducing pain on injection and resulting in quicker onset of anaesthesia.

摘要

在口腔颌面外科手术中,注射利多卡因作为局部麻醉剂来控制疼痛本身可能会很疼。麻醉起效时间为3至5分钟。碳酸氢钠已在全球范围内用于减少注射带来的这两个缺点,从而使手术更容易被接受。这项随机前瞻性试验纳入了100名年龄在18至55岁之间的患者,他们接受了3种神经阻滞(下牙槽神经、舌神经和颊长神经),旨在评估用碳酸氢钠碱化利多卡因溶液的效果。所有患者均接受含1:80,000肾上腺素的2%盐酸利多卡因,50名患者被随机分配接受1/10稀释的8.4%碳酸氢钠。疼痛通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行测量。与未接受碳酸氢钠的39/50(78%)患者相比,接受碳酸氢钠注射的患者均未抱怨疼痛(p<0.0001)。接受碳酸氢钠组局部麻醉起效的平均(标准差)时间(秒)为34.4(9.8),而对照组为109.8(31.6)(p<0.001)。我们的结果证实了碱化局部麻醉溶液在减轻注射疼痛和加快麻醉起效方面的有效性。

相似文献

1
Effect of alkalinisation of lignocaine for intraoral nerve block on pain during injection, and speed of onset of anaesthesia.利多卡因碱化用于口腔内神经阻滞对注射时疼痛及麻醉起效速度的影响。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Dec;49(8):e72-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.04.068. Epub 2011 May 18.
2
Faster onset and more comfortable injection with alkalinized 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000.使用碱化的2%利多卡因加1:100,000肾上腺素,起效更快且注射更舒适。
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013 Feb;34 Spec No 1:10-20.
3
Articaine and lignocaine efficiency in infiltration anaesthesia: a pilot study.阿替卡因与利多卡因在浸润麻醉中的效果:一项初步研究。
Br Dent J. 2004 Jul 10;197(1):45-6; discussion 33. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4811422.
4
The effect of vibration on pain during local anaesthesia injections.局部麻醉注射时振动对疼痛的影响。
Aust Dent J. 2009 Jun;54(2):94-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01100.x.
5
Pain elicited during intraoral infiltration with buffered lidocaine.用缓冲利多卡因进行口腔内浸润麻醉时引发的疼痛。
Am J Dent. 1996 Feb;9(1):5-10.
6
Efficacy of combining a buccal infiltration with an inferior alveolar nerve block for mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis.颊侧浸润联合下牙槽神经阻滞用于下颌磨牙不可逆性牙髓炎的疗效
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Mar;109(3):468-73. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.11.016.
7
Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations of articaine and lidocaine after an inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis.在下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉后,补充颊侧和舌侧注射阿替卡因和利多卡因对不可逆性牙髓炎患者的麻醉效果。
J Endod. 2009 Jul;35(7):925-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.012.
8
Injection pain of the inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis.不可逆性牙髓炎患者下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉的注射痛
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Oct;104(4):571-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.04.017. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
9
Relief of palatal injection pain by liposome-encapsulated 2% lignocaine prepared by ultrasonic dental scaler.超声洁牙机制备的脂质体包裹2%利多卡因缓解腭部注射疼痛
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;50(8):784-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
10
Evaluation of mandibular block using a standardized method.使用标准化方法评估下颌阻滞。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Oct;102(4):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy and Onset of Local Anesthesia Using Buffered 2% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 Adrenaline, Non-buffered 2% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 Adrenaline, Buffered 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 Adrenaline and Non-buffered 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 Adrenaline in Dental Extraction.在拔牙术中使用含1:100,000肾上腺素的缓冲2%利多卡因、含1:100,000肾上腺素的非缓冲2%利多卡因、含1:100,000肾上腺素的缓冲4%阿替卡因和含1:100,000肾上腺素的非缓冲4%阿替卡因进行局部麻醉的疗效和起效时间的比较评估
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Oct;23(5):1255-1260. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01945-0. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
2
Comparing the Efficacy of 8.4% and 7.5% Buffered Lidocaine during Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar- A Split Mouth Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.比较8.4%和7.5% 缓冲利多卡因在拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙手术中的疗效——一项双侧对照双盲随机对照研究
J Dent (Shiraz). 2024 Sep 1;25(3):262-267. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.98891.2115. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Buffered versus Non-buffered Local Anaesthesia in Minor Oral Surgery - A Comparative Study.小型口腔外科手术中缓冲与非缓冲局部麻醉的比较研究
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jan-Jun;14(1):15-20. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_168_21. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
4
Evaluation of the efficacy of buffered local anesthetic in extraction of infected teeth-randomized double-blind study.评价缓冲局麻药在感染牙拔除术中的疗效:随机双盲研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jun;28(2):803-807. doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01206-5. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
5
Anesthetic efficacy of buffered 4% articaine for mandibular first molar infiltration: a crossover clinical trial.缓冲4%阿替卡因在下颌第一磨牙浸润麻醉中的效果:一项交叉临床试验。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Jun;23(3):135-141. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.3.135. Epub 2023 May 26.
6
Efficacy of Sodium Bicarbonate-Buffered Local Anesthetic Solution in Cases Requiring Bilateral Maxillary Premolar Orthodontic Extraction: A Comparative Split-Mouth Study.碳酸氢钠缓冲局部麻醉溶液在双侧上颌前磨牙正畸拔牙病例中的疗效:一项对比性双侧对照研究。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 21;15(4):e37934. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37934. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
Comparative Analysis of Different Local Anesthetic Solutions Available in Market: An In Vitro and Clinical Study.市场上不同局部麻醉剂溶液的比较分析:一项体外和临床研究。
Eur J Dent. 2021 Oct;15(4):660-668. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1727553. Epub 2021 May 26.
8
Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy.根管治疗患者中喷射注射技术与传统注射技术的比较。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):28-31. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_466_19. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
9
Buffered versus unbuffered local anesthesia for inferior alveolar nerve block injections in children: a systematic review.儿童下牙槽神经阻滞注射中缓冲与非缓冲局部麻醉的系统评价
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Oct;20(5):271-279. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.5.271. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
10
Buffered 2% articaine versus non-buffered 4% articaine in maxillary infiltration: randomized clinical trial.缓冲 2%阿替卡因对上颌窦内注射非缓冲 4%阿替卡因:随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jun;25(6):3527-3533. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03674-x. Epub 2020 Nov 5.