Australian Centre for International and Tropical Health School of Population Health The University of Queensland Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Global Health. 2011 May 19;7:16. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-16.
In March 2009, the Task Force for Innovative International Financing for Health Systems recommended "a health systems funding platform for the Global Fund, GAVI Alliance, the World Bank and others to coordinate, mobilize, streamline and channel the flow of existing and new international resources to support national health strategies." Momentum to establish the Health Systems Funding Platform was swift, with the World Bank convening a Technical Workshop on Health Systems Strengthening (HSS), and serial meetings organized to progress the agenda. Despite its potential significance, there has been little comment in peer-reviewed literature, though some disquiet in the international development community around the scope of the Platform and the capacity of the partners, which appears disproportionate to the available information.
This case study uses documentary analysis, participant observation and 24 in-depth interviews to examine the processes of development and key issues raised by the Platform.
The findings show a fluid and volatile process, with debate over whether ongoing engagement in HSS by Global Fund and GAVI represents a dilution of organizational focus, risking ongoing support, or a paradigm shift that facilitates the achievement of targeted objectives, builds systems capacity, and will attract additional resources. Uncertainty in the development of the Platform reflects the flexibility of the recently formed global health initiatives, and the instability of donor commitments, particularly in the current financial climate. But implicit in the conflict is tension between key global stakeholders over defining and ownership of the health systems agenda.
The tensions appear to have been resolved through a focus on national planning, applying International Health Partnership principles, though the global financial crisis and key personnel changes may yet alter outcomes. Despite its dynamic evolution, the Platform may offer an incremental path towards increasing integration around health systems, that has not been previously possible.
2009 年 3 月,创新国际卫生系统融资工作队建议“为全球基金、免疫联盟、世界银行和其他机构建立一个卫生系统供资平台,以协调、调动、精简和引导现有和新的国际资源流动,支持国家卫生战略。” 为建立卫生系统供资平台,各方迅速采取行动,世界银行召开了一次卫生系统加强技术研讨会,并组织了一系列会议以推进议程。尽管该平台具有潜在的重要意义,但在同行评议文献中却很少有评论,尽管国际发展界对平台的范围和合作伙伴的能力存在一些担忧,但这似乎与现有的信息不成比例。
本案例研究使用文件分析、参与观察和 24 次深入访谈来研究平台的发展过程和提出的关键问题。
研究结果表明,这是一个充满活力和变化的过程,围绕全球基金和免疫联盟持续参与卫生系统加强工作是否会导致组织重点分散,从而危及持续支持,还是会促成有利于实现既定目标、建立系统能力并吸引更多资源的范式转变,存在着激烈的争论。平台的发展存在不确定性,反映了新成立的全球卫生倡议的灵活性,以及捐助者承诺的不稳定性,特别是在当前的金融环境下。但在这种冲突中,隐含着主要全球利益攸关方在确定卫生系统议程及其所有权方面的紧张关系。
通过关注国家规划、应用国际卫生伙伴关系原则,紧张局势似乎已经得到解决,尽管全球金融危机和关键人员变动可能会改变结果。尽管该平台经历了动态演变,但它可能提供了一条以前不可能实现的、逐步增加围绕卫生系统整合的途径。