• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测叶面积和干物质的异速生长。

Predicting the allometry of leaf surface area and dry mass.

机构信息

Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 USA.

出版信息

Am J Bot. 2009 Feb;96(2):531-6. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800250.

DOI:10.3732/ajb.0800250
PMID:21628208
Abstract

The manner in which increases in leaf surface area S scale with respect to increases in leaf dry mass M(t) within and across species has important implications to understanding the ability of plants to harvest sunlight, grow, and ultimately reproduce. Thus far, no mechanistic explanation has been advanced to explain why prior work shows that the scaling exponent governing the S to M(t) relationship is generally significantly less than one (i.e., S ∝ M(t)(α < 1.0)) such that increases in M(t) yield diminishing returns with respect to increases in S across most species. Here, we show analytically why this phenomenon occurs and present equations that predict trends observed in the numerical values of scaling exponents for the S vs. M(t) relationships observed across dicot tree species and two aquatic vascular plant species.

摘要

叶片表面积 S 相对于叶干质量 M(t) 的增加方式在种内和种间对理解植物捕获阳光、生长和最终繁殖的能力具有重要意义。到目前为止,还没有提出机械解释来说明为什么先前的工作表明,控制 S 与 M(t) 关系的标度指数通常显著小于 1(即,S∝M(t)(α<1.0)),以至于在大多数物种中,M(t) 的增加相对于 S 的增加带来的回报递减。在这里,我们分析了为什么会出现这种现象,并提出了预测跨双子叶树种和两种水生维管植物观察到的 S 与 M(t) 关系的标度指数数值趋势的方程。

相似文献

1
Predicting the allometry of leaf surface area and dry mass.预测叶面积和干物质的异速生长。
Am J Bot. 2009 Feb;96(2):531-6. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800250.
2
Evidence for "diminishing returns" from the scaling of stem diameter and specific leaf area.茎直径和比叶面积的标度比例的“收益递减”证据。
Am J Bot. 2008 May;95(5):549-57. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800034.
3
Canonical rules for plant organ biomass partitioning and annual allocation.植物器官生物量分配和年度分配的规范规则。
Am J Bot. 2002 May;89(5):812-9. doi: 10.3732/ajb.89.5.812.
4
Diminishing returns: A comparison between fresh mass vs. area and dry mass vs. area in deciduous species.收益递减:落叶树种鲜质量与面积以及干质量与面积的比较。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Oct 4;13:832300. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.832300. eCollection 2022.
5
"Diminishing returns" in the scaling of leaf area vs. dry mass in Wuyi Mountain bamboos, Southeast China.中国东南部武夷山竹子叶面积与干质量缩放中的“收益递减”
Am J Bot. 2017 Jul;104(7):993-998. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1700068. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
6
Reexamination of a canonical model for plant organ biomass partitioning.重新考察植物器官生物量分配的规范模型。
Am J Bot. 2003 Feb;90(2):250-4. doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.2.250.
7
"Diminishing returns" and leaf area-biomass scaling of ferns in subtropical ecosystems.亚热带生态系统中蕨类植物的“收益递减”与叶面积-生物量缩放关系
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jun 27;14:1187704. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1187704. eCollection 2023.
8
Zero-sum allocational strategies determine the allometry of specific leaf area.零和分配策略决定了比叶面积的异速生长。
Am J Bot. 2010 Nov;97(11):1808-15. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1000118. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
9
"Diminishing returns" for leaves of five age-groups of Phyllostachys edulis culms.毛竹五个年龄组竹秆叶片的“收益递减”
Am J Bot. 2021 Sep;108(9):1662-1672. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1738. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
10
Diminishing returns among lamina fresh and dry mass, surface area, and petiole fresh mass among nine Lauraceae species.九种樟科植物叶片鲜重与干重、表面积以及叶柄鲜重之间的收益递减情况。
Am J Bot. 2022 Mar;109(3):377-392. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1812. Epub 2022 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Does season regulate heterochronous leaf growth? Mechanisms of petiole-lamina trade-offs in broad-leaved woody plants of the Tianshan Mountains.季节是否调节不同步的叶片生长?天山阔叶木本植物叶柄 - 叶片权衡的机制。
Plant Divers. 2024 Jul 16;46(6):755-765. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2024.07.003. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Leaf-age and petiole biomass play significant roles in leaf scaling theory.叶龄和叶柄生物量在叶片比例理论中起着重要作用。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Dec 21;14:1322245. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1322245. eCollection 2023.
3
Diminishing returns: A comparison between fresh mass vs. area and dry mass vs. area in deciduous species.
收益递减:落叶树种鲜质量与面积以及干质量与面积的比较。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Oct 4;13:832300. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.832300. eCollection 2022.
4
Accelerating leaf area measurement using a volumetric approach.使用容积法加速叶面积测量。
Plant Methods. 2022 May 9;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13007-022-00896-w.
5
Geometric and topological approaches to shape variation in leaves.叶片形状变化的几何与拓扑学方法
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Nov 24;8(11):210978. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210978. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Geographic Variation in the Petiole-Lamina Relationship of 325 Eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Woody Species: Analysis in Three Dimensions.325种青海东部-西藏木本植物叶柄-叶片关系的地理变异:三维分析
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Oct 28;12:748125. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.748125. eCollection 2021.
7
Leaf chemical defences and insect herbivory in oak: accounting for canopy position unravels marked genetic relatedness effects.叶片化学防御与栎树的昆虫取食:解释树冠位置如何消除显著的遗传相关性影响。
Ann Bot. 2020 Oct 6;126(5):865-872. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa101.
8
The genetic control of leaf allometry in the common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris.菜豆(Phaseolus vulgaris)叶片异速生长的遗传控制。
BMC Genet. 2020 Mar 14;21(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12863-020-00838-2.
9
Why Does Not the Leaf Weight-Area Allometry of Bamboos Follow the 3/2-Power Law?为什么竹子的叶重-面积异速生长不遵循3/2幂定律?
Front Plant Sci. 2018 May 4;9:583. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00583. eCollection 2018.
10
Scaling relationships of twig biomass allocation in Pinus hwangshanensis along an altitudinal gradient.黄山松小枝生物量分配沿海拔梯度的缩放关系
PLoS One. 2017 May 26;12(5):e0178344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178344. eCollection 2017.