Paneru S R, Rijal Raju, Shrestha B P, Nepal P, Khanal G P, Karn N K, Singh M P, Rai P
J Child Orthop. 2010 Jun;4(3):233-7. doi: 10.1007/s11832-010-0250-1. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
Long arm cast is the method of immobilization after closed reduction of the fracture of the distal third of the forearm, although short arm cast has been used to immobilize the forearm by some orthopedic surgeons. We conducted this study to evaluate the rate of displacement, union time, complication, and cost of treatment between the above-elbow and below-elbow plaster cast groups.
We designed a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare above- and below-elbow casts for patients of distal forearm fracture aged 4-12 years. One hundred and one patients were presented to our institution during the period from 1st June 2007 to 31st May 2008. Twelve patients were excluded from the study. Eighty-nine patients were randomized into two groups. Four patients were lost to follow up. Hence, 85 patients, 42 in the above-elbow group and 43 in the below-elbow group, were analyzed. Informed consent was obtained prior to participation in the trial. The parameters to be studied were defined before treatment and noted in the pilot-tested pro forma and follow up was done.
Among the 85 patients analyzed, randomization was successful. Pain and swelling on the next day and at one week following cast application was significantly higher (P = 0.000) in the above-elbow group. Three cases in the above-elbow group needed slitting of the plaster cast. Remanipulation was needed more often in the above-elbow group (9.5%). Although the cast index was not statistically significant (P = 0.054) between the groups, those who needed remanipulation had a larger cast index (0.80). The total cost of the treatment and the number of school days lost was significantly higher (P = 0.000) in the above-elbow group.
Below-elbow cast treatment was comparable in terms of redisplacement, union time, and movement of the wrist to the above-elbow treatment. The complications rate and total cost was higher in the above-elbow plaster group, which could be a cost benefit if a below-elbow cast is used.
长臂石膏是前臂远端三分之一骨折闭合复位后常用的固定方法,不过一些骨科医生也会使用短臂石膏来固定前臂。我们开展这项研究,旨在评估肘上和肘下石膏固定组之间的移位率、愈合时间、并发症及治疗费用。
我们设计了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,比较4至12岁前臂远端骨折患者使用肘上石膏和肘下石膏的效果。2007年6月1日至2008年5月31日期间,共有101名患者到我院就诊。12名患者被排除在研究之外。89名患者被随机分为两组。4名患者失访。因此,最终分析了85名患者,其中肘上组42例,肘下组43例。在参与试验前,所有患者均签署了知情同意书。在治疗前确定要研究的参数,并记录在经过预试验的表格中,之后进行随访。
在分析的85名患者中,随机分组成功。肘上组在石膏固定后第二天及一周时的疼痛和肿胀程度明显更高(P = 0.000)。肘上组有3例患者需要切开石膏。肘上组需要再次手法复位的情况更多(9.5%)。虽然两组之间的石膏指数无统计学意义(P = 0.054),但需要再次手法复位的患者石膏指数更大(0.80)。肘上组的治疗总费用和缺课天数明显更高(P = 0.000)。
就再移位、愈合时间和腕关节活动度而言,肘下石膏固定治疗与肘上石膏固定治疗效果相当。肘上石膏组的并发症发生率和总费用更高,因此使用肘下石膏可能具有成本效益。