• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

词语和声音在婴儿视觉处理中的作用:从遮蔽到注意力调谐。

The role of words and sounds in infants' visual processing: from overshadowing to attentional tuning.

机构信息

The Ohio State University, Center for Cognitive Science.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2008 Mar;32(2):342-65. doi: 10.1080/03640210701863495.

DOI:10.1080/03640210701863495
PMID:21635339
Abstract

Although it is well documented that language plays an important role in cognitive development, there are different views concerning the mechanisms underlying these effects. Some argue that even early in development, effects of words stem from top-down knowledge, whereas others argue that these effects stem from auditory input affecting attention allocated to visual input. Previous research (e.g., Robinson & Sloutsky, 2004a) demonstrated that non-speech sounds attenuate processing of corresponding visual input at 8, 12, and 16 months of age, whereas the current study demonstrates that words attenuate visual processing at 10 months but not at 16 months (Experiment 1). Furthermore, prefamiliarization with non-speech sounds (Experiment 2) resulted in able processing of visual input by 16-month-olds. These findings suggest that some effects of labels found early in development may stem from familiarity with human speech. The possibility of general-auditory factors underlying the effects of words on cognitive development is discussed.

摘要

尽管语言在认知发展中起着重要作用这一点已有充分的文献记载,但对于这些影响的背后机制仍存在不同的观点。一些人认为,即使在发展早期,单词的影响也源自自上而下的知识,而另一些人则认为这些影响源自听觉输入对视觉输入分配注意力的影响。先前的研究(例如,Robinson & Sloutsky,2004a)表明,非语音声音会削弱 8、12 和 16 个月大的婴儿对相应视觉输入的处理,而当前的研究表明,单词会削弱 10 个月大婴儿的视觉处理,但不会削弱 16 个月大婴儿的视觉处理(实验 1)。此外,非语音声音的预先熟悉(实验 2)导致 16 个月大的婴儿能够处理视觉输入。这些发现表明,在发展早期发现的一些标签的影响可能源自对人类言语的熟悉程度。讨论了言语对认知发展影响的背后可能存在一般听觉因素的可能性。

相似文献

1
The role of words and sounds in infants' visual processing: from overshadowing to attentional tuning.词语和声音在婴儿视觉处理中的作用:从遮蔽到注意力调谐。
Cogn Sci. 2008 Mar;32(2):342-65. doi: 10.1080/03640210701863495.
2
Effects of auditory input in individuation tasks.个体化任务中听觉输入的影响。
Dev Sci. 2008 Nov;11(6):869-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00751.x.
3
Learning words' sounds before learning how words sound: 9-month-olds use distinct objects as cues to categorize speech information.在学习单词发音之前先学习单词的语音:9个月大的婴儿将不同的物体用作对语音信息进行分类的线索。
Cognition. 2009 Nov;113(2):234-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.010. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
4
Visual processing speed: effects of auditory input on visual processing.视觉处理速度:听觉输入对视觉处理的影响。
Dev Sci. 2007 Nov;10(6):734-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00627.x.
5
Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words.婴儿对英语单词主要重音模式的偏好。
Child Dev. 1993 Jun;64(3):675-87.
6
Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.自上而下的听觉加工调制:声音背景、音乐专业知识和注意力焦点的影响。
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Oct;30(8):1636-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06955.x. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
7
Two mechanisms underlying auditory dominance: Overshadowing and response competition.两种听觉优势的机制:掩蔽和反应竞争。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Feb;178:317-340. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
8
Auditory dominance and its change in the course of development.听觉优势及其在发育过程中的变化。
Child Dev. 2004 Sep-Oct;75(5):1387-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00747.x.
9
The impact of novel labels on visual processing during infancy.新型标签对婴儿期视觉处理的影响。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;29(Pt 4):783-805. doi: 10.1348/2044-835X.002008. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
10
[The acquisition of language through finger spelling in a child with auditory agnosia (author's transl)].[一名听觉失认症儿童通过手指拼写习得语言(作者译)]
No To Shinkei. 1982 May;34(5):485-91.

引用本文的文献

1
Words and arbitrary actions in early object categorization: weak evidence for a word advantage.早期客体分类中的言语与随意动作:言语优势的微弱证据
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Feb 21;11(2):230648. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230648. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Formal theories clarify the complex: Generalizing a neural process account of the interaction of visual exploration and word learning in infancy.正式理论阐明了复杂性:将婴儿期视觉探索和词汇学习的神经过程解释推广。
Child Dev. 2023 Nov-Dec;94(6):1491-1510. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14023. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
3
Neurobiological mechanisms for language, symbols and concepts: Clues from brain-constrained deep neural networks.
神经生物学机制语言、符号和概念:来自受大脑约束的深度神经网络的线索。
Prog Neurobiol. 2023 Nov;230:102511. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102511. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
4
Does Human Touch Facilitate Object Categorization in 6-to-9-Month-Old Infants?人类触摸是否有助于6至9个月大婴儿对物体进行分类?
Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 6;10(12):940. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120940.
5
Eleven-Month-Olds Link Sound Properties With Animal Categories.11个月大的婴儿将声音属性与动物类别联系起来。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 19;11:559390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559390. eCollection 2020.
6
Listen to Your Heart: Examining Modality Dominance Using Cross-Modal Oddball Tasks.倾听你的内心:使用跨模态Oddball任务检查模态优势。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 28;11:1643. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01643. eCollection 2020.
7
Development of rapid word-object associations in relation to expressive vocabulary: Shared commonalities in infants and toddlers with and without Williams syndrome.快速词汇-物体关联发展与表达性词汇的关系:伴有和不伴有威廉姆斯综合征的婴幼儿的共同特点。
Dev Sci. 2020 Nov;23(6):e12966. doi: 10.1111/desc.12966. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
8
Developmental Differences in Filtering Auditory and Visual Distractors During Visual Selective Attention.视觉选择性注意过程中过滤听觉和视觉干扰物的发育差异
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 17;9:2564. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02564. eCollection 2018.
9
Bimodal Presentation Speeds up Auditory Processing and Slows Down Visual Processing.双峰呈现加快听觉处理并减慢视觉处理。
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 5;9:2454. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02454. eCollection 2018.
10
Speech Facilitates the Categorization of Motions in 9-Month-Old Infants.言语有助于9个月大婴儿对动作进行分类。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 20;9:2146. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02146. eCollection 2018.