Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2011 Aug;101(8):1466-73. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300111. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
We considered the relationship between an urban adult population's fruit and vegetable consumption and several selected social and psychological processes, beneficial aesthetic experiences, and garden participation.
We conducted a population-based survey representing 436 residents across 58 block groups in Denver, Colorado, from 2006 to 2007. We used multilevel statistical models to evaluate the survey data.
Neighborhood aesthetics, social involvement, and community garden participation were significantly associated with fruit and vegetable intake. Community gardeners consumed fruits and vegetables 5.7 times per day, compared with home gardeners (4.6 times per day) and nongardeners (3.9 times per day). Moreover, 56% of community gardeners met national recommendations to consume fruits and vegetables at least 5 times per day, compared with 37% of home gardeners and 25% of nongardeners.
Our study results shed light on neighborhood processes that affect food-related behaviors and provides insights about the potential of community gardens to affect these behaviors. The qualities intrinsic to community gardens make them a unique intervention that can narrow the divide between people and the places where food is grown and increase local opportunities to eat better.
我们研究了城市成年人口的水果和蔬菜消费与一些选定的社会和心理过程、有益的审美体验和花园参与之间的关系。
我们在 2006 年至 2007 年期间进行了一项基于人群的调查,代表了科罗拉多州丹佛市 58 个街区组的 436 名居民。我们使用多层次统计模型来评估调查数据。
邻里美学、社会参与和社区花园参与与水果和蔬菜的摄入量显著相关。与家庭园丁(每天 4.6 次)和非园丁(每天 3.9 次)相比,社区园丁每天食用水果和蔬菜 5.7 次。此外,56%的社区园丁符合国家建议,每天至少食用 5 次水果和蔬菜,而家庭园丁为 37%,非园丁为 25%。
我们的研究结果揭示了影响与食物相关行为的邻里过程,并提供了关于社区花园影响这些行为的潜力的见解。社区花园所具有的内在品质使它们成为一种独特的干预措施,可以缩小人与种植食物的地方之间的差距,并增加改善当地饮食的机会。