• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Postoperative pain assessment in special patient groups: part II. Children with cognitive impairment].

作者信息

Messerer B, Meschik J, Gutmann A, Vittinghoff M, Sandner-Kiesling A

机构信息

Univ Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Universität Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036 Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Schmerz. 2011 Jun;25(3):256-65. doi: 10.1007/s00482-011-1061-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00482-011-1061-0
PMID:21692007
Abstract

Postoperative pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment poses major challenges to healthcare professionals.Children with moderate to severe cognitive impairment are generally unable to communicate effectively and to self-report the level of pain. Difficulties assessing pain have led to their exclusion from clinical trials and rendered them vulnerable to insufficient treatment of pain.The realization of pain is a particularly important step forward for a better care of children with cognitive impairment.Scales based on a child's own perception of pain and its severity play a limited role in this vulnerable population and pain assessment tools which rely on observing pain behavior are essential. The r-FLACC, which is reliable and valid, includes specific behavioral descriptors and can be used simply and effectively postoperatively in clinical practice. Our task has to be assessing pain as a routine procedure in cognitively impaired children as a keystone for an improved and successful pain management in this very sensitive patient population.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Postoperative pain assessment in special patient groups: part II. Children with cognitive impairment].
Schmerz. 2011 Jun;25(3):256-65. doi: 10.1007/s00482-011-1061-0.
2
[Postoperative pain assessment in special patient groups: part I: children without cognitive impairment].[特殊患者群体的术后疼痛评估:第一部分:无认知障碍儿童]
Schmerz. 2011 Jun;25(3):245-55. doi: 10.1007/s00482-011-1060-1.
3
Postoperative pain assessment in preverbal children and children with cognitive impairment.对学语前儿童和认知障碍儿童的术后疼痛评估。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Jun;18(6):462-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02433.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
4
The reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability observational tool as a measure of pain in children with cognitive impairment.面部、腿部、活动、哭闹、安抚性观察工具作为评估认知障碍儿童疼痛程度的可靠性和有效性。
Anesth Analg. 2002 Nov;95(5):1224-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200211000-00020.
5
The COMFORT behavioural scale and the modified FLACC scale in paediatric intensive care.儿科重症监护中的COMFORT行为量表和改良的FLACC量表。
Nurs Crit Care. 2009 May-Jun;14(3):122-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2009.00323.x.
6
Validation of the COMFORT Behavior scale and the FLACC scale for pain assessment in Chinese children after cardiac surgery.COMFORT行为量表和FLACC量表在中国儿童心脏手术后疼痛评估中的有效性验证。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2012 Mar;13(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2010.07.002. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
7
Detection and assessment of postoperative pain in children with cognitive impairment: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.检测和评估认知障碍儿童术后疼痛:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Eur J Pain. 2022 May;26(5):965-979. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1936. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
8
Are postoperative pain instruments useful for specific groups of vulnerable infants?术后疼痛评估工具对特定群体的脆弱婴儿有用吗?
Clin Perinatol. 2002 Sep;29(3):469-91, x. doi: 10.1016/s0095-5108(02)00015-5.
9
Validity of parent ratings as proxy measures of pain in children with cognitive impairment.家长评分作为认知障碍儿童疼痛替代指标的有效性。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2005 Dec;6(4):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2005.08.004.
10
A comparison of the clinical utility of pain assessment tools for children with cognitive impairment.认知障碍儿童疼痛评估工具的临床效用比较。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):72-8, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287680.21212.d0.

引用本文的文献

1
[Organization of pediatric pain management: Austrian interdisciplinary recommendations for pediatric perioperative pain management].[儿科疼痛管理的组织:奥地利儿科围手术期疼痛管理跨学科建议]
Schmerz. 2014 Feb;28(1):14-24. doi: 10.1007/s00482-013-1383-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioral pain assessment and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability instrument.行为疼痛评估与面部、腿部、活动、哭泣和安抚工具。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2003 Jun;3(3):317-25. doi: 10.1586/14737167.3.3.317.
2
Assessing pain by facial expression: facial expression as nexus.通过面部表情评估疼痛:作为纽带的面部表情
Pain Res Manag. 2009 Jan-Feb;14(1):53-8. doi: 10.1155/2009/542964.
3
[Risk assessment in pain therapy].[疼痛治疗中的风险评估]
Schmerz. 2008 Oct;22(5):594-603. doi: 10.1007/s00482-008-0688-y.
4
Assessment of pain.疼痛评估
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen103. Epub 2008 May 16.
5
Postoperative pain assessment in preverbal children and children with cognitive impairment.对学语前儿童和认知障碍儿童的术后疼痛评估。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Jun;18(6):462-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02433.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
6
[Ethic charter of the German Society for the Study of Pain (DGSS)].[德国疼痛研究协会(DGSS)伦理宪章]
Schmerz. 2008 Apr;22(2):191-206. doi: 10.1007/s00482-008-0648-6.
7
Pain in hospitalized children: a prospective cross-sectional survey of pain prevalence, intensity, assessment and management in a Canadian pediatric teaching hospital.住院儿童的疼痛:加拿大一家儿科教学医院对疼痛发生率、强度、评估及管理的一项前瞻性横断面调查
Pain Res Manag. 2008 Jan-Feb;13(1):25-32. doi: 10.1155/2008/478102.
8
A comparison of the clinical utility of pain assessment tools for children with cognitive impairment.认知障碍儿童疼痛评估工具的临床效用比较。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):72-8, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287680.21212.d0.
9
[Reliability and validity of the german language version of the "NCCPC-R"].["《中国癌症患者生活质量核心量表 - 修订版》德语版的信度与效度"]
Pflege. 2007 Apr;20(2):93-102. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302.20.2.93.
10
[A Hebrew version of the FLACC scale: measurement of pain in non-verbal children].
Harefuah. 2006 Sep;145(9):648-51, 704, 703.