Suppr超能文献

比较 150μg 吲哚洛尔和 300μg 吲哚洛尔与福莫特罗+布地奈德或沙美特罗+氟替卡松固定剂量联合治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效-网络荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy of indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg versus fixed-dose combinations of formoterol + budesonide or salmeterol + fluticasone for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease--a network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Mapi Values, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:329-44. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S18759. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare efficacy of indacaterol to that of fixed-dose combination (FDC) formoterol and budesonide (FOR/BUD) and FDC salmeterol and fluticasone (SAL/FP) for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on the available randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Fifteen placebo-controlled RCTs were included that evaluated: indacaterol 150 μg (n = 5 studies), indacaterol 300 μg (n = 4), FOR/BUD 9/160 μg (n = 2), FOR/BUD 9/320 μg (n = 3), SAL/FP 50/500 μg (n = 5), and SAL/FP 50/250 μg (n = 1). Outcomes of interest were trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), total scores for St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and transition dyspnea index (TDI). All trials were analyzed simultaneously using a Bayesian network meta-analysis and relative treatment effects between all regimens were obtained. Treatment-by-covariate interactions were included where possible to improve the similarity of the trials.

RESULTS

Indacaterol 150 μg resulted in a higher change from baseline (CFB) in FEV(1) at 12 weeks compared to FOR/BUD 9/160 μg (difference in CFB 0.11 L [95% credible intervals: 0.08, 0.13]) and FOR/BUD 9/320 μg (0.09 L [0.06, 0.11]) and was comparable to SAL/FP 50/250 μg (0.02 L [-0.04, 0.08]) and SAL/FP 50/500 μg (0.03 L [0.00, 0.06]). Similar results were observed for indacaterol 300 μg at 12 weeks and indacaterol 150/300 μg at 6 months. Indacaterol 150 μg demonstrated comparable improvement in SGRQ total score at 6 months versus FOR/BUD (both doses), and SAL/FP 50/500 μg (-2.16 point improvement [-4.96, 0.95]). Indacaterol 150 and 300 μg demonstrated comparable TDI scores versus SAL/FP 50/250 μg (0.21 points (-0.57, 0.99); 0.39 [-0.39, 1.17], respectively) and SAL/FP 50/500 μg at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Indacaterol monotherapy is expected to be at least as good as FOR/BUD (9/320 and 9/160 μg) and comparable to SAL/FP (50/250 and 50/500 μg) in terms of lung function. Indacaterol is also expected to be comparable to FOR/BUD (9/320 and 9/160 μg) and SAL/FP 50/500 μg in terms of health status and to SAL/FP (50/250 and 50/500 μg) in terms of breathlessness.

摘要

目的

根据现有随机对照试验(RCT)比较茚达特罗与固定剂量复方制剂(FDC)福莫特罗/布地奈德(FOR/BUD)和 FDC 沙美特罗/氟替卡松(SAL/FP)治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的疗效。

方法

纳入了 15 项安慰剂对照 RCT,评估了:茚达特罗 150μg(n=5 项研究)、茚达特罗 300μg(n=4 项)、FOR/BUD 9/160μg(n=2 项)、FOR/BUD 9/320μg(n=3 项)、SAL/FP 50/500μg(n=5 项)和 SAL/FP 50/250μg(n=1 项)。感兴趣的结局指标为谷值用力呼气量(FEV1)、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)总评分和呼吸困难指数(TDI)。所有试验均同时采用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析进行分析,并获得所有治疗方案之间的相对治疗效果。在可能的情况下,包括治疗-协变量相互作用,以提高试验的相似性。

结果

与 FOR/BUD 9/160μg(0.11L[95%可信区间:0.08,0.13])和 FOR/BUD 9/320μg(0.09L[0.06,0.11])相比,茚达特罗 150μg在 12 周时使 FEV1的从基线变化(CFB)更高,与 SAL/FP 50/250μg(0.02L[-0.04,0.08])和 SAL/FP 50/500μg(0.03L[0.00,0.06])相当。在 12 周时,观察到相同的结果,在 6 个月时,与 SAL/FP 50/500μg相比,观察到 300μg 剂量的茚达特罗具有类似的改善作用。与 FOR/BUD(两种剂量)和 SAL/FP 50/500μg相比,茚达特罗 150μg在 6 个月时的 SGRQ 总评分也具有相似的改善(分别为-2.16 分的改善[-4.96,0.95])。与 SAL/FP 50/250μg(0.21 点[-0.57,0.99])和 SAL/FP 50/500μg(0.39[-0.39,1.17])相比,150μg 和 300μg 的 TDI 评分也具有可比性。

结论

茚达特罗单药治疗在肺功能方面预计至少与福莫特罗/布地奈德(9/320 和 9/160μg)相当,与沙美特罗/氟替卡松(50/250 和 50/500μg)相当。茚达特罗在健康状况方面也与福莫特罗/布地奈德(9/320 和 9/160μg)相当,在呼吸困难方面与沙美特罗/氟替卡松(50/250 和 50/500μg)相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577b/3119108/be74c7cb93c3/copd-6-329f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验