Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Repair, School of Allied Medical Professions, The Ohio State University, 106 Atwell Hall, 453 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
PM R. 2011 Jun;3(6 Suppl 1):S73-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.02.019.
Despite intensive neurorehabilitation, extensive functional recovery after spinal cord injury is unattainable for most individuals. Optimal recovery will likely depend on activity-based, task-specific training that personalizes the timing of intervention with the severity of injury. Exercise paradigms elicit both beneficial and deleterious biophysical effects after spinal cord injury. Modulating the type, intensity, complexity, and timing of training may minimize risk and induce greater recovery. This review discusses the following: (a) the biological underpinning of training paradigms that promote motor relearning and recovery, and (b) how exercise interacts with cellular cascades after spinal cord injury. Clinical implications are discussed throughout.
尽管进行了强化神经康复,但大多数脊髓损伤患者仍无法实现广泛的功能恢复。最佳的恢复可能取决于基于活动的、特定于任务的训练,这种训练可以根据损伤的严重程度来个性化干预的时间。运动训练模式在脊髓损伤后会产生有益和有害的生物物理效应。调节训练的类型、强度、复杂性和时间可以最大程度地降低风险并促进更大的恢复。这篇综述讨论了以下内容:(a)促进运动再学习和恢复的训练模式的生物学基础,以及(b)运动在脊髓损伤后与细胞级联的相互作用。在整个讨论中都涉及到临床意义。