• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

失踪人员身份识别中先验概率的应用。

Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications.

作者信息

Budowle Bruce, Ge Jianye, Chakraborty Ranajit, Gill-King Harrell

机构信息

Institute of Investigative Genetics, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, 76102, USA.

出版信息

Investig Genet. 2011 Jun 27;2(1):15. doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-2-15.

DOI:10.1186/2041-2223-2-15
PMID:21707977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3146928/
Abstract

Identification of missing persons from mass disasters is based on evaluation of a number of variables and observations regarding the combination of features derived from these variables. DNA typing now is playing a more prominent role in the identification of human remains, and particularly so for highly decomposed and fragmented remains. The strength of genetic associations, by either direct or kinship analyses, is often quantified by calculating a likelihood ratio. The likelihood ratio can be multiplied by prior odds based on nongenetic evidence to calculate the posterior odds, that is, by applying Bayes' Theorem, to arrive at a probability of identity. For the identification of human remains, the path creating the set and intersection of variables that contribute to the prior odds needs to be appreciated and well defined. Other than considering the total number of missing persons, the forensic DNA community has been silent on specifying the elements of prior odds computations. The variables include the number of missing individuals, eyewitness accounts, anthropological features, demographics and other identifying characteristics. The assumptions, supporting data and reasoning that are used to establish a prior probability that will be combined with the genetic data need to be considered and justified. Otherwise, data may be unintentionally or intentionally manipulated to achieve a probability of identity that cannot be supported and can thus misrepresent the uncertainty with associations. The forensic DNA community needs to develop guidelines for objectively computing prior odds.

摘要

大规模灾难中失踪人员的身份识别基于对多个变量的评估以及对源自这些变量的特征组合的观察。如今,DNA分型在人类遗骸的身份识别中发挥着更为突出的作用,对于高度腐败和碎片化的遗骸尤其如此。通过直接分析或亲属关系分析得出的基因关联强度通常通过计算似然比来量化。似然比可以乘以基于非基因证据的先验概率,以计算后验概率,也就是说,通过应用贝叶斯定理来得出身份认定的概率。对于人类遗骸的身份识别,需要理解并明确有助于先验概率的变量集和交集的形成路径。除了考虑失踪人员的总数外,法医DNA领域在明确先验概率计算的要素方面一直保持沉默。这些变量包括失踪人员的数量、目击者陈述、人类学特征、人口统计学信息及其他识别特征。需要考虑并论证用于确定将与基因数据相结合的先验概率的假设、支持数据和推理。否则,数据可能会被无意或有意地操纵,以获得无法得到支持的身份认定概率,从而可能错误地呈现关联的不确定性。法医DNA领域需要制定客观计算先验概率的指导方针。

相似文献

1
Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications.失踪人员身份识别中先验概率的应用。
Investig Genet. 2011 Jun 27;2(1):15. doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-2-15.
2
GHEP-ISFG collaborative simulated exercise for DVI/MPI: Lessons learned about large-scale profile database comparisons.全球卫生人力联盟-国际骨矿研究学会关于数字视频影像/心肌灌注成像的协作模拟演练:大规模个人资料数据库比较的经验教训
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Mar;21:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
3
Genetic identification of missing persons: DNA analysis of human remains and compromised samples.失踪人员的遗传学鉴定:人类遗骸和受损样本的 DNA 分析。
Pathobiology. 2012;79(5):228-38. doi: 10.1159/000334982. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
4
Incorporating non-genetic evidence in large scale missing person searches: A general approach beyond filtering.将非遗传证据纳入大规模失踪人员搜索中:超越过滤的一般方法。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2023 Sep;66:102891. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.102891. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
5
Using Bayes' rule to define the value of evidence from syndromic surveillance.使用贝叶斯法则定义症状监测证据的价值。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 3;9(11):e111335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111335. eCollection 2014.
6
Reply to Budowle, Ge, Chakraborty and Gill-King: use of prior odds for missing persons identifications.对布多勒、葛、恰克拉波蒂和吉尔 - 金的回复:在失踪人员身份鉴定中使用先验概率。
Investig Genet. 2012 Jan 31;3(1):2. doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-3-2.
7
Eyewitness Evidence: Improving Its Probative Value.目击证据:提高其证据价值。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Nov;7(2):45-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00027.x. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
8
Forensic aspects of mass disasters: strategic considerations for DNA-based human identification.大规模灾难的法医学问题:基于DNA的人类身份鉴定的战略考量
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2005 Jul;7(4):230-43. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2005.01.001. Epub 2005 Mar 17.
9
Second GHEP-ISFG exercise for DVI: "DNA-led" victims' identification in a simulated air crash.第二次 GHEP-ISFG 用于 DVI 的演习:模拟空难中的“DNA 主导”受害者识别。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2021 Jul;53:102527. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102527. Epub 2021 May 19.
10
Structured incorporation of prior information in relationship identification problems.在关系识别问题中对先验信息进行结构化整合。
Ann Hum Genet. 2007 Jul;71(Pt 4):501-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00345.x. Epub 2007 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Providing a Forensic Expert Opinion on the "Degree of Force": Evidentiary Considerations.就“武力程度”提供法医专家意见:证据考量
Biology (Basel). 2021 Dec 16;10(12):1336. doi: 10.3390/biology10121336.
2
The search process: Integrating the investigation and identification of missing and unidentified persons.搜索过程:整合失踪人员和身份不明人员的调查与识别工作。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Jun 9;3:100154. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100154. eCollection 2021.
3
How many familial relationship testing results could be wrong?有多少亲属关系检测结果可能是错误的?
PLoS Genet. 2020 Aug 13;16(8):e1008929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008929. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
Using already-solved cases of a mass disaster event for prioritizing the search among remaining victims: a Bayesian approach.利用已解决的大规模灾难事件案例对剩余受害者进行优先搜索:一种贝叶斯方法。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 19;10(1):5026. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59841-3.
5
The role of forensic anthropology in disaster victim identification (DVI): recent developments and future prospects.法医人类学在灾难遇难者身份鉴定(DVI)中的作用:最新进展与未来前景
Forensic Sci Res. 2018 Oct 2;4(4):303-315. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2018.1480460. eCollection 2019.
6
The role of prior probability in forensic assessments.先验概率在法医评估中的作用。
Front Genet. 2013 Oct 28;4:220. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00220. eCollection 2013.
7
Response to: Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications - authors' reply.对《失踪人员身份识别中先验概率的应用——作者回复》的回应
Investig Genet. 2012 Feb 1;3(1):3. doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-3-3.
8
Reply to Budowle, Ge, Chakraborty and Gill-King: use of prior odds for missing persons identifications.对布多勒、葛、恰克拉波蒂和吉尔 - 金的回复:在失踪人员身份鉴定中使用先验概率。
Investig Genet. 2012 Jan 31;3(1):2. doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-3-2.

本文引用的文献

1
DNA identification by pedigree likelihood ratio accommodating population substructure and mutations.通过考虑群体亚结构和突变的系谱似然比进行DNA鉴定。
Investig Genet. 2010 Oct 4;1(1):8. doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-1-8.
2
Technical note: a re-evaluation of stature estimation from skeletal length in the grave.技术说明:对骨骼长度进行重新评估,以估计坟墓中的身高。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2011 Feb;144(2):327-30. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21427.
3
Pedigree likelihood ratio for lineage markers.系谱似然比用于谱系标记。
Int J Legal Med. 2011 Jul;125(4):519-25. doi: 10.1007/s00414-010-0514-9. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
4
Molecular genetic identification of skeletal remains from the Second World War Konfin I mass grave in Slovenia.斯洛文尼亚二战 Konfin I 万人冢骨骼遗骸的分子遗传学鉴定。
Int J Legal Med. 2010 Jul;124(4):307-17. doi: 10.1007/s00414-010-0431-y. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
5
Validation of software for calculating the likelihood ratio for parentage and kinship.用于计算亲子关系和亲属关系似然比的软件验证。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2009 Mar;3(2):112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.11.005. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
6
DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): recommendations regarding the role of forensic genetics for disaster victim identification (DVI).国际法医遗传学协会(ISFG)DNA委员会:关于法医遗传学在灾难遇难者身份鉴定(DVI)中作用的建议。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Mar;1(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2006.10.003. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
7
Equal prior probabilities: can one do any better?相等的先验概率:还能做得更好吗?
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Oct 25;172(2-3):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.12.008. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
8
Value of DNA tests: a decision perspective.
J Forensic Sci. 2007 Jan;52(1):31-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00302.x.
9
Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems.面向对象的贝叶斯网络用于复杂的法医DNA图谱分析问题。
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Jul 4;169(2-3):195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.08.028. Epub 2006 Oct 20.
10
The nature of forensic science opinion--a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigations and in court proceedings.法医学意见的性质——一个可能用于指导调查及法庭程序中的思考与实践的框架。
Sci Justice. 2006 Jan-Mar;46(1):33-44. doi: 10.1016/s1355-0306(06)71565-9.