• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于计算亲子关系和亲属关系似然比的软件验证。

Validation of software for calculating the likelihood ratio for parentage and kinship.

作者信息

Drábek J

机构信息

LEM, Faculty of Medicine, Palacký University, Puskinova 6, 77520 Olomouc, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2009 Mar;3(2):112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.11.005. Epub 2008 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.11.005
PMID:19215880
Abstract

Although the likelihood ratio is a well-known statistical technique, commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) software products for its calculation are not sufficiently validated to suit general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories (EN/ISO/IEC 17025:2005 norm) per se. The software in question can be considered critical as it directly weighs the forensic evidence allowing judges to decide on guilt or innocence or to identify person or kin (i.e.: in mass fatalities). For these reasons, accredited laboratories shall validate likelihood ratio software in accordance with the above norm. To validate software for calculating the likelihood ratio in parentage/kinship scenarios I assessed available vendors, chose two programs (Paternity Index and familias) for testing, and finally validated them using tests derived from elaboration of the available guidelines for the field of forensics, biomedicine, and software engineering. MS Excel calculation using known likelihood ratio formulas or peer-reviewed results of difficult paternity cases were used as a reference. Using seven testing cases, it was found that both programs satisfied the requirements for basic paternity cases. However, only a combination of two software programs fulfills the criteria needed for our purpose in the whole spectrum of functions under validation with the exceptions of providing algebraic formulas in cases of mutation and/or silent allele.

摘要

尽管似然比是一种广为人知的统计技术,但用于计算似然比的商业现货(COTS)软件产品本身并未得到充分验证,无法满足测试和校准实验室能力的一般要求(EN/ISO/IEC 17025:2005标准)。所讨论的软件可被视为关键软件,因为它直接权衡法医证据,使法官能够判定有罪或无罪,或识别个人或亲属(即:在大规模死亡事件中)。出于这些原因,认可实验室应根据上述标准对似然比软件进行验证。为了验证用于亲子关系/亲属关系场景中计算似然比的软件,我评估了现有的供应商,选择了两个程序(父权指数和familias)进行测试,最后使用从法医学、生物医学和软件工程领域的现有指南中提炼出的测试方法对它们进行了验证。使用已知似然比公式的MS Excel计算或疑难亲子鉴定案例的同行评审结果作为参考。通过七个测试案例发现,这两个程序都满足基本亲子鉴定案例的要求。然而,在验证的整个功能范围内,只有两个软件程序的组合满足我们的目的所需的标准,但在突变和/或沉默等位基因情况下提供代数公式的情况除外。

相似文献

1
Validation of software for calculating the likelihood ratio for parentage and kinship.用于计算亲子关系和亲属关系似然比的软件验证。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2009 Mar;3(2):112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.11.005. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
2
Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.使用常染色体单核苷酸多态性(autosomal SNPs)作为补充标记来解析显示模糊短串联重复序列(STR)结果的亲缘关系测试。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008 Jun;2(3):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
3
[DNAStat, version 1.0--a software package for processing a genetic profile database and for biostatistical calculations].[DNAStat,版本1.0——一个用于处理基因图谱数据库和进行生物统计计算的软件包]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2006 Jan-Mar;56(1):15-8.
4
Validation of DNA-based identification software by computation of pedigree likelihood ratios.通过计算系谱似然比验证基于 DNA 的识别软件。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011 Aug;5(4):308-15. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
5
ISFG: Recommendations on biostatistics in paternity testing.国际法医遗传学会:亲子鉴定中的生物统计学建议。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Dec;1(3-4):223-31. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.06.006. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
6
Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues.使用X染色体标记进行亲缘关系检测:数学和统计学问题。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Jun;1(2):111-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.01.014. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
7
[Spreadsheets of a conventional application software for calculation of plausibility of paternity: application to parentage testing with highly polymorphic markers in deceased party].
Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi. 1997 Jun;51(3):196-204.
8
Structured incorporation of prior information in relationship identification problems.在关系识别问题中对先验信息进行结构化整合。
Ann Hum Genet. 2007 Jul;71(Pt 4):501-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00345.x. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
9
Familias 3 - Extensions and new functionality.Familias 3 - 扩展与新功能。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Nov;13:121-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
10
A statistical treatment of biases affecting the estimation of mutation rates.对影响突变率估计的偏差的统计学处理。
Mutat Res. 2004 Mar 22;547(1-2):19-33. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.11.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematically improving the efficiency of complex kinship identification through the addition of genetic markers and reference individuals.通过添加遗传标记和参考个体来系统地提高复杂亲缘关系鉴定的效率。
Int J Legal Med. 2025 Mar 22. doi: 10.1007/s00414-025-03473-7.
2
DNA analysis in Disaster Victim Identification.灾难遇难者身份鉴定中的DNA分析。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012 Jun;8(2):140-7. doi: 10.1007/s12024-011-9276-z. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
3
Mutation analysis of 24 short tandem repeats in Chinese Han population.中国汉族人群 24 个短串联重复序列的突变分析。
Int J Legal Med. 2012 Mar;126(2):331-5. doi: 10.1007/s00414-011-0630-1. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
4
MtDNA diversity of Ghana: a forensic and phylogeographic view.加纳的线粒体 DNA 多样性:法医学和系统地理学视角。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012 Mar;6(2):244-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
5
Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications.失踪人员身份识别中先验概率的应用。
Investig Genet. 2011 Jun 27;2(1):15. doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-2-15.
6
DNA identification by pedigree likelihood ratio accommodating population substructure and mutations.通过考虑群体亚结构和突变的系谱似然比进行DNA鉴定。
Investig Genet. 2010 Oct 4;1(1):8. doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-1-8.
7
Inspecting close maternal relatedness: Towards better mtDNA population samples in forensic databases.检测近亲关系:建立更好的法医数据库 mtDNA 群体样本。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011 Mar;5(2):138-41. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.10.001. Epub 2010 Nov 9.