Suppr超能文献

心电图 QT 间期与死亡率:荟萃分析。

Electrocardiographic QT interval and mortality: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2011 Sep;22(5):660-70. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318225768b.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extremely abnormal prolongation of the electrocardiographic QT interval is associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. However, the implications of variations in QT-interval length within normal limits for mortality in the general population are still unclear.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the relation of QT interval with mortality endpoints. Inverse-variance weighted random-effects models were used to summarize the relative risks across studies. Twenty-three observational studies were included.

RESULTS

The pooled relative risk estimates comparing the highest with the lowest categories of QT-interval length were 1.35 (95% confidence interval = 1.24-1.46) for total mortality, 1.51 (1.29-1.78) for cardiovascular mortality, 1.71 (1.36-2.15) for coronary heart disease mortality, and 1.44 (1.01-2.04) for sudden cardiac death. A 50 milliseconds increase in QT interval was associated with a relative risk of 1.20 (1.15-1.26) for total mortality, 1.29 (1.15-1.46) for cardiovascular mortality, 1.49 (1.25-1.76) for coronary heart disease mortality, and 1.24 (0.97-1.60) for sudden cardiac death.

CONCLUSIONS

We found consistent associations between prolonged QT interval and increased risk of total, cardiovascular, coronary, and sudden cardiac death. QT-interval length is a determinant of mortality in the general population.

摘要

背景

心电图 QT 间期极度异常延长与恶性室性心律失常和心脏性猝死有关。然而,正常范围内 QT 间期长度的变化对普通人群死亡率的影响仍不清楚。

方法

我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以研究 QT 间期与死亡率终点的关系。采用逆方差加权随机效应模型汇总研究间的相对风险。共纳入 23 项观察性研究。

结果

比较 QT 间期最长和最短组的汇总相对风险估计值分别为总死亡率 1.35(95%置信区间 1.24-1.46)、心血管死亡率 1.51(1.29-1.78)、冠心病死亡率 1.71(1.36-2.15)和心脏性猝死 1.44(1.01-2.04)。QT 间期增加 50 毫秒与总死亡率的相对风险为 1.20(1.15-1.26)、心血管死亡率 1.29(1.15-1.46)、冠心病死亡率 1.49(1.25-1.76)和心脏性猝死 1.24(0.97-1.60)相关。

结论

我们发现 QT 间期延长与总死亡率、心血管死亡率、冠心病死亡率和心脏性猝死风险增加之间存在一致的关联。QT 间期长度是普通人群死亡率的决定因素。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating artificial intelligence-enabled medical tests in cardiology: Best practice.评估心脏病学中人工智能辅助医学检测:最佳实践。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Aug 30;60:101783. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101783. eCollection 2025 Oct.
10
Evaluation of Arrhythmia Risk in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.1型糖尿病患儿心律失常风险评估
J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2025 May 27;17(2):146-152. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2024.2024-7-28. Epub 2024 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

2
QTc: how long is too long?QTc间期:多长算过长?
Br J Sports Med. 2009 Sep;43(9):657-62. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.054734.
3
The QT interval: too long, too short or just right.QT间期:过长、过短还是恰到好处。
Heart Rhythm. 2009 May;6(5):711-5. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.02.044. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
9
The prognostic value of T wave amplitude in lead aVR in males.男性aVR导联T波振幅的预后价值。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2008 Apr;13(2):113-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2008.00210.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验