Department of Psychology. Centro Rodero, Clínica de Neurociencias, Santander, Spain.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jun 29;12:143. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-143.
Previous research has found that acceptance of pain is more successful than cognitive coping variables for predicting adjustment to pain. This research has a limitation because measures of cognitive coping rely on observations and reports of thoughts or attempts to change thoughts rather than on overt behaviours. The purpose of the present study, therefore, is to compare the influence of acceptance measures and the influence of different behavioural coping strategies on the adjustment to chronic pain.
A sample of 167 individuals diagnosed with fibromyalgia syndrome completed the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (CPCI) and the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ).
Correlational analyses indicated that the acceptance variables were more related to distress and functioning than were behavioural coping variables. The average magnitudes of the coefficients for activity engagement and pain willingness (both subscales of pain acceptance) across the measures of distress and functioning were r = 0.42 and 0.25, respectively, meanwhile the average magnitude of the correlation between coping and functioning was r = 0.17. Regression analyses examined the independent, relative contributions of coping and acceptance to adjustment indicators and demonstrated that acceptance accounted for more variance than did coping variables. The variance contributed by acceptance scores ranged from 4.0 to 40%. The variance contributed by the coping variables ranged from 0 to 9%.
This study extends the findings of previous work in enhancing the adoption of acceptance-based interventions for maintaining accurate functioning in fibromyalgia patients.
先前的研究发现,与认知应对变量相比,接受疼痛更能成功预测对疼痛的适应。这项研究存在一个局限性,因为认知应对的测量方法依赖于对思维的观察和报告,或者试图改变思维,而不是公开的行为。因此,本研究的目的是比较接受度测量和不同行为应对策略对慢性疼痛适应的影响。
167 名被诊断为纤维肌痛综合征的个体完成了慢性疼痛应对量表(CPCI)和慢性疼痛接受问卷(CPAQ)。
相关分析表明,与行为应对变量相比,接受度变量与痛苦和功能的相关性更强。在痛苦和功能的衡量标准中,活动参与和疼痛意愿(疼痛接受的两个分量表)的平均系数大小分别为 r = 0.42 和 0.25,而应对和功能之间的相关系数平均大小为 r = 0.17。回归分析检验了应对和接受对调整指标的独立相对贡献,并表明接受度比应对变量能更好地预测适应情况。接受度得分的方差贡献范围从 4.0%到 40%不等。应对变量的方差贡献范围从 0%到 9%不等。
本研究扩展了先前的工作发现,采用基于接受的干预措施有助于维持纤维肌痛患者的准确功能。