• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业久坐时间:员工对健康风险的认知和干预策略。

Occupational sitting time: employees' perceptions of health risks and intervention strategies.

机构信息

The University of Queensland, Brisbane.

出版信息

Health Promot J Austr. 2011 Apr;22(1):38-43. doi: 10.1071/he11038.

DOI:10.1071/he11038
PMID:21717836
Abstract

ISSUE ADDRESSED

There is increasing interest in the potential association between sedentary behaviour and poor health. This study examined office-based employees' perceptions of the health risks associated with prolonged sitting at work, and strategies to interrupt and reduce occupational sitting time.

METHODS

Four focus groups were conducted with a convenience sample of Australian government personnel (20 women and two men). Open-ended questions concerning health risks and sitting reduction strategies were posed by lead researchers and focus group participants invited to express opinions, viewpoints and experiences. Audio recordings and summary notes of focus group discussions were reviewed by researchers to identify key response themes.

RESULTS

Employees associated prolonged occupational sitting with poor health, primarily in terms of musculoskeletal issues, fatigue and de-motivation.This risk was seen as independent of physical activity. Workplace interventions tailored to occupational roles were viewed as important and considered to be the joint responsibility of individuals and organisations. Strategies included workload planning (interspersing sedentary and non-sedentary tasks), environmental change (e.g. stairwell access, printers away from desks), work tasks on the move (e.g. walking meetings) and purposive physical activity (e.g. periodic breaks, exercise/walking groups).The perception that these strategies would compromise productivity was identified as the primary barrier to implementation; team leaders were subsequently considered vital in enabling integration and acceptance of strategies into everyday workplace practices.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged occupational sitting was perceived as detrimental to health. Suggested strategies targeted individuals, workplaces, organisations and environments.

摘要

问题解决

久坐行为与健康状况不佳之间可能存在关联,这一问题引起了越来越多的关注。本研究探讨了办公室工作人员对与工作中长时间久坐相关的健康风险的看法,以及中断和减少职业性久坐时间的策略。

方法

采用便利抽样法,对澳大利亚政府工作人员(20 名女性和 2 名男性)进行了 4 次焦点小组讨论。由主要研究人员提出与健康风险和减少久坐策略相关的开放性问题,鼓励焦点小组参与者发表意见、观点和经验。研究人员对焦点小组讨论的录音和总结笔记进行了回顾,以确定关键的回应主题。

结果

员工将长时间的职业性久坐与健康问题联系起来,主要是肌肉骨骼问题、疲劳和动力不足。这种风险被认为独立于体力活动。针对职业角色的工作场所干预被认为是重要的,并被视为个人和组织的共同责任。策略包括工作负荷规划(穿插久坐和非久坐任务)、环境变化(例如楼梯间的可达性、打印机远离办公桌)、在工作中移动完成任务(例如步行会议)和有目的的体育活动(例如定期休息、锻炼/步行小组)。人们认为这些策略会影响生产力,这是实施的主要障碍;因此,团队领导被认为是将策略融入日常工作实践中的关键。

结论

长时间的职业性久坐被认为对健康有害。提出的策略针对个人、工作场所、组织和环境。

相似文献

1
Occupational sitting time: employees' perceptions of health risks and intervention strategies.职业久坐时间:员工对健康风险的认知和干预策略。
Health Promot J Austr. 2011 Apr;22(1):38-43. doi: 10.1071/he11038.
2
Occupational sitting: practitioner perceptions of health risks, intervention strategies and influences.职业久坐:从业者对健康风险、干预策略和影响的认知。
Health Promot J Austr. 2012 Dec;23(3):208-12. doi: 10.1071/he12208.
3
Feasibility and acceptability of reducing workplace sitting time: a qualitative study with Australian office workers.减少工作场所久坐时间的可行性与可接受性:一项针对澳大利亚办公室职员的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 5;16(1):933. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3611-y.
4
Acceptability and feasibility of potential intervention strategies for influencing sedentary time at work: focus group interviews in executives and employees.影响工作时久坐时间的潜在干预策略的可接受性和可行性:针对高管和员工的焦点小组访谈
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Feb 18;12:22. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0177-5.
5
Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a flexible office-based workplace: Employee perceptions and priorities for change.灵活的办公室工作场所中的身体活动与久坐行为:员工认知及变革重点
Health Promot J Austr. 2018 Dec;29(3):344-352. doi: 10.1002/hpja.164. Epub 2018 May 15.
6
"It's not an Obvious Issue, Is It?" Office-Based Employees' Perceptions of Prolonged Sitting at Work: A Qualitative Study.“这不是个明显的问题,对吧?”——基于定性研究的办公员工对工作中长时间久坐的看法。
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Dec;59(12):1161-1165. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001130.
7
Australian employee perceptions of an organizational-level intervention to reduce sitting.澳大利亚员工对一项旨在减少久坐的组织层面干预措施的看法。
Health Promot Int. 2018 Dec 1;33(6):968-979. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax037.
8
Occupational sitting time, its determinants and intervention strategies in Malaysian office workers: a mixed-methods study.马来西亚办公室职员的职业久坐时间、其决定因素及干预策略:一项混合方法研究。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Apr 29;37(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab149.
9
Reducing occupational sitting: Workers' perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention.减少工作中的久坐时间:工人对参与多成分干预措施的看法。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 May 30;14(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0530-y.
10
What strategies do desk-based workers choose to reduce sitting time and how well do they work? Findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial.久坐办公族选择了哪些策略来减少久坐时间,这些策略效果如何?一项整群随机对照试验的结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Oct 12;15(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0731-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Education Levels and Sedentary Behavior With Depression Among US Adults.美国成年人教育水平与久坐行为和抑郁症之间的关联。
Brain Behav. 2025 Jun;15(6):e70615. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70615.
2
Continuous work-related sitting time and its association with perceived workplace support for health among workers in the Greater Accra Municipality: a cross-sectional analysis with sensitivity analyses.连续的与工作相关的坐姿时间及其与大阿克拉地区工人感知的工作场所健康支持之间的关系:一项具有敏感性分析的横断面分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):3057. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20572-z.
3
Study protocol and rationale of "the UP project": evaluating the effectiveness of active breaks on health indicators in desk-based workers.
“UP 项目”的研究方案和原理:评估主动休息对伏案工作者健康指标的有效性。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 19;12:1363015. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1363015. eCollection 2024.
4
"It depends on the boss" - a qualitative study of multi-level interventions aiming at office workers' movement behaviour and mental health.“这取决于老板”——一项旨在改善上班族运动行为和心理健康的多层次干预措施的定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2258564. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2258564. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
5
Cerebral gray matter volume correlates with fatigue and varies between desk workers and non-desk workers.脑灰质体积与疲劳相关,且在办公室职员和非办公室职员之间存在差异。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Sep 15;16:951754. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.951754. eCollection 2022.
6
Prevalence and associated factors of lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders among manufacturing workers: a cross-sectional study in China.制造业工人下肢肌肉骨骼疾病的患病率及相关因素:中国的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 2;12(2):e054969. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054969.
7
Understanding the Implementation of "Sit Less at Work" Interventions in Three Organisations: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation.理解三个组织中“减少工作时久坐”干预措施的实施情况:一项混合方法的过程评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 9;18(14):7361. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147361.
8
Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review.积极设计对工作场所的活动、久坐行为、健康和生产力有影响吗?系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 10;17(24):9228. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249228.
9
Underlying Factors Explaining Physical Behaviors among Office Workers-An Exploratory Analysis.解释办公室工作人员身体行为的潜在因素——探索性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 8;17(24):9158. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249158.
10
Workplace Sedentary Behavior and Productivity: A Cross-Sectional Study.工作场所久坐行为与生产力:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 8;17(18):6535. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186535.