• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌克兰和波兰选定农业设施中生物气溶胶暴露情况综述

Exposure to bioaerosols in the selected agricultural facilities of the Ukraine and Poland - a review.

作者信息

Tsapko Valentin G, Chudnovets Alla J, Sterenbogen Marina J, Papach Vladimir V, Dutkiewicz Jacek, Skórska Czesława, Krysińska-Traczyk Ewa, Golec Marcin

机构信息

Institute of Occupational Medicine, Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine.

出版信息

Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011;18(1):19-27.

PMID:21736265
Abstract

The aim of this work was to review the studies on bioaerosols which were carried out in the years 1972-2009 in following branches of agricultural industry in the Ukraine and Poland: animal farms for cows and pigs, animal feed facilities, production of biofuel from rape, herb farms and herb processing facilities. In all facilities were determined: concentration of dust and microorganisms in the air and species composition of microflora. Moreover, in Polish animal farms, herb farms and herb processing facilities, as well as in the Ukrainian animal feed facilities, was determined the concentration of bacterial endotoxin in the air. Dust concentrations in animal farms located in the Ukraine and Poland ranged from 6-200 mg/m(3) and from 0.25-14.05 mg/m(3), respectively, while in animal feed facilities they ranged from 35-306 mg/m(3) and from 3.8-405 mg/m(3), respectively. Dust concentrations in the facilities producing biofuel from rape in the Ukraine were in the range 3.6-28 mg/m(3), whereas on herb farms and in herb processing facilities in Poland they were in the range 0.8- 1,319.6 mg/m(3), and 2.2-946 mg/m(3), respectively. The determined values exceeded in most cases the maximal acceptable concentration (MAC) which in the Ukraine and Poland is equal to 4 mg/m(3). The concentrations of microorganisms on animal farms located in the Ukraine and Poland ranged from 5.5 x 10(4)- 1.9 x 10(7) cfu/m(3) and from 4.7 x 10(4)-1.5 x 10(6) cfu/m(3), respectively, while in animal feed facilities they ranged from 2.7 x 10(4)-2.6 x 10(9) cfu/m(3) and from 1.7 x 10(3)-2.0 x 10(6) cfu/m(3), respectively. Concentrations of microorganisms in the facilities producing biofuel from rape in the Ukraine were in the range 1.5 x 10(3)-5.7 x 10(6) cfu/m(3), whereas on herb farms and in herb processing facilities in Poland they were in the ranges of 8.8 x 10(2)-8.0 x 10(6) cfu/m(3), and 9.7 x 10(3)-6.3 x 10(5) cfu/m(3), respectively. The determined values exceeded in most cases the maximal acceptable concentration (MAC) which in the Ukraine is equal to 5.0 x 10(4) cfu/m(3). The concentrations of endotoxin in Polish animal houses were in the range 0.00125-75.0 ug/m(3), whereas on herb farms and herb processing facilities they were in the ranges of 0.0045- 2,448.8 ug/m(3) and 0.2-681.0 ug/m(3), respectively, and in the Ukrainian animal feed facilities were within the range 0.008-240.0 ug/m(3). They exceeded in most cases the level of 0.2 ug/m(3) proposed as a threshold. In the air microflora of examined facilities prevailed Gram-positive bacteria (corynebacteria, cocci, spore-forming bacilli, actinomycetes) of which some (Arthrobacter spp., thermophilic actinomycetes) could be a cause of allergic alveolitis (hypersensitivity pneumonitis). Among Gram-negative bacteria isolated from the air of agricultural settings dominated the epiphytic species Pantoea agglomerans, possessing potent allergenic and endotoxic properties. Fungi were abundant in the air of the Ukrainian agricultural settings and comprised species able to produce harmful mycotoxins. In conclusion, the airborne biological factors in stated concentrations may exert harmful effects on the state of the health of exposed workers. Formation of the bioaerosol depends on the specificity of the setting, kind of technological operations, degree of mechanization, properties of processed materials, temperature and humidity, and concentration of dust in the air.

摘要

这项工作的目的是回顾1972年至2009年期间在乌克兰和波兰农业的以下分支领域开展的关于生物气溶胶的研究:奶牛和养猪场、动物饲料设施、油菜生物燃料生产、草药农场和草药加工设施。在所有设施中测定了:空气中灰尘和微生物的浓度以及微生物群落的物种组成。此外,在波兰的动物农场、草药农场和草药加工设施,以及乌克兰的动物饲料设施中,还测定了空气中细菌内毒素的浓度。位于乌克兰和波兰的动物农场中的灰尘浓度分别为6 - 200毫克/立方米和0.25 - 14.05毫克/立方米,而动物饲料设施中的灰尘浓度分别为35 - 306毫克/立方米和3.8 - 405毫克/立方米。乌克兰油菜生物燃料生产设施中的灰尘浓度范围为3.6 - 28毫克/立方米,而波兰草药农场和草药加工设施中的灰尘浓度分别为0.8 - 1319.6毫克/立方米和2.2 - 946毫克/立方米。所测定的值在大多数情况下超过了乌克兰和波兰等于4毫克/立方米的最大可接受浓度(MAC)。位于乌克兰和波兰的动物农场中的微生物浓度分别为5.5×10⁴ - 1.9×10⁷ 菌落形成单位/立方米和4.7×10⁴ - 1.5×10⁶ 菌落形成单位/立方米,而动物饲料设施中的微生物浓度分别为2.7×10⁴ - 2.6×10⁹ 菌落形成单位/立方米和1.7×10³ - 2.0×10⁶ 菌落形成单位/立方米。乌克兰油菜生物燃料生产设施中的微生物浓度范围为1.5×10³ - 5.7×10⁶ 菌落形成单位/立方米,而波兰草药农场和草药加工设施中的微生物浓度分别为8.8×10² - 8.0×10⁶ 菌落形成单位/立方米和9.7×10³ - 6.3×10⁵ 菌落形成单位/立方米。所测定的值在大多数情况下超过了乌克兰等于5.0×10⁴ 菌落形成单位/立方米的最大可接受浓度(MAC)。波兰动物舍中的内毒素浓度范围为0.00125 - 75.0微克/立方米,而草药农场和草药加工设施中的内毒素浓度分别为0.0045 - 2448.8微克/立方米和0.2 - 681.0微克/立方米,乌克兰动物饲料设施中的内毒素浓度范围为0.008 - 240.0微克/立方米。它们在大多数情况下超过了提议作为阈值的0.2微克/立方米的水平。在所检查设施的空气微生物群落中,革兰氏阳性菌(棒状杆菌、球菌、产芽孢杆菌、放线菌)占主导,其中一些(节杆菌属、嗜热放线菌)可能是变应性肺泡炎(过敏性肺炎)的病因。从农业环境空气中分离出的革兰氏阴性菌中,附生种成团泛菌占主导,具有强大的致敏和内毒素特性。真菌在乌克兰农业环境空气中含量丰富,包括能够产生有害霉菌毒素的物种。总之,所述浓度的空气传播生物因子可能对接触工人的健康状况产生有害影响。生物气溶胶的形成取决于环境的特殊性、技术操作种类、机械化程度、加工材料的特性、温度和湿度以及空气中灰尘的浓度。

相似文献

1
Exposure to bioaerosols in the selected agricultural facilities of the Ukraine and Poland - a review.乌克兰和波兰选定农业设施中生物气溶胶暴露情况综述
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011;18(1):19-27.
2
Exposure to airborne microorganisms, dust and endotoxin during processing of peppermint and chamomile herbs on farms.在农场加工薄荷和洋甘菊草药过程中暴露于空气传播的微生物、灰尘和内毒素。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2005;12(2):281-8.
3
Occupational exposure to organic dust, microorganisms, endotoxin and peptidoglycan among plants processing workers in Poland.波兰植物加工工人中有机粉尘、微生物、内毒素和肽聚糖的职业暴露情况。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2009;16(1):143-50.
4
Exposure to airborne microorganisms, dust and endotoxin during flax scutching on farms.农场亚麻打麻过程中暴露于空气传播的微生物、灰尘和内毒素中。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2004;11(2):309-17.
5
Exposure of hop growers to bioaerosols.啤酒花种植者接触生物气溶胶的情况。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2004;11(1):129-38.
6
Exposure to airborne microorganisms and endotoxin in herb processing plants.草药加工厂中空气传播微生物和内毒素的暴露情况。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2001;8(2):201-11.
7
Exposure of Indian agricultural workers to airborne microorganisms, dust and endotoxin during handling of various plant products.印度农业工人在处理各种植物产品过程中暴露于空气中的微生物、灰尘和内毒素的情况。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2005;12(2):269-75.
8
Exposure to airborne microorganisms, dust and endotoxin during processing of valerian roots on farms.在农场加工缬草根的过程中暴露于空气传播的微生物、灰尘和内毒素。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2005;12(1):119-26.
9
Pantoea agglomerans: a mysterious bacterium of evil and good. Part II--Deleterious effects: Dust-borne endotoxins and allergens--focus on grain dust, other agricultural dusts and wood dust.成团泛菌:一种亦正亦邪的神秘细菌。第二部分——有害影响:空气中传播的内毒素和过敏原——聚焦谷物粉尘、其他农业粉尘和木尘。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2016;23(1):6-29. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1196848.
10
Exposure to airborne microorganisms and endotoxin in a potato processing plant.马铃薯加工厂中空气传播微生物和内毒素的暴露情况。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2002;9(2):225-35.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematized Overview of Published Reviews on Biological Hazards, Occupational Health, and Safety.已发表的关于生物危害、职业健康与安全的综述的系统概述。
Saf Health Work. 2023 Dec;14(4):347-357. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
2
Microbial Contamination of Bedding Material: One Health in Poultry Production. bedding material 垫料
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 8;19(24):16508. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416508.
3
The Relationship between Uterine, Fecal, Bedding, and Airborne Dust Microbiota from Dairy Cows and Their Environment: A Pilot Study.
奶牛子宫、粪便、垫料和空气中尘埃微生物群与其环境之间的关系:一项初步研究。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Nov 21;9(12):1007. doi: 10.3390/ani9121007.
4
How Safe is Chicken Litter for Land Application as an Organic Fertilizer? A Review.鸡粪垫料作为有机肥在土地中的应用有多安全?综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 20;16(19):3521. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193521.
5
Assessment of occupational exposure to azole resistant fungi in 10 Portuguese bakeries.对葡萄牙10家面包店中职业性接触唑类抗性真菌的评估。
AIMS Microbiol. 2017 Dec 14;3(4):960-975. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.960. eCollection 2017.
6
Bioaerosols Play a Major Role in the Nasopharyngeal Microbiota Content in Agricultural Environment.生物气溶胶在农业环境鼻咽微生物群内容中起主要作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 16;16(8):1375. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081375.
7
Occupational Exposure to Mycotoxins in Swine Production: Environmental and Biological Monitoring Approaches.猪生产中霉菌毒素的职业暴露:环境和生物监测方法。
Toxins (Basel). 2019 Feb 1;11(2):78. doi: 10.3390/toxins11020078.
8
A Novel Multi-Approach Protocol for the Characterization of Occupational Exposure to Organic Dust-Swine Production Case Study.一种用于表征职业性有机粉尘暴露的新型多方法协议——养猪生产案例研究
Toxics. 2017 Dec 27;6(1):5. doi: 10.3390/toxics6010005.
9
Cytotoxic and Inflammatory Potential of Air Samples from Occupational Settings with Exposure to Organic Dust.接触有机粉尘的职业环境空气样本的细胞毒性和炎症潜力。
Toxics. 2017 Mar 1;5(1):8. doi: 10.3390/toxics5010008.
10
Impact of Mycotoxins Secreted by Aspergillus Molds on the Inflammatory Response of Human Corneal Epithelial Cells.曲霉属霉菌分泌的霉菌毒素对人角膜上皮细胞炎症反应的影响
Toxins (Basel). 2017 Jun 22;9(7):197. doi: 10.3390/toxins9070197.