Complex Trait Genetics, Department of Functional Genomics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), FALW-VUA, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Behav Genet. 2012 Jan;42(1):170-86. doi: 10.1007/s10519-011-9480-3. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
The variance components models for gene-environment interaction proposed by Purcell in 2002 are widely used. In both the bivariate and the univariate parameterization of these models, the variance decomposition of trait T is a function of moderator M. We show that if M and T are correlated, and moderator M is correlated between twins as well, the univariate parameterization produces a considerable increase in false positive moderation effects. A simple extension of this univariate moderation model prevents this elevation of the false positive rate provided the covariance between M and T is itself not also subject to moderation. If the covariance between M and T varies as a function of M, then moderation effects observed in the univariate setting should be interpreted with care as these can have their origin in either moderation of the covariance between M and T or in moderation of the unique paths of T. We conclude that researchers should use the full bivariate moderation model to study the presence of moderation on the covariance between M and T. If such moderation can be ruled out, subsequent use of the extended univariate moderation model, as proposed in this paper, is recommended as this model is more powerful than the full bivariate moderation model.
2002 年,Purcell 提出了用于基因-环境相互作用的方差分量模型,该模型被广泛应用。在这些模型的双变量和单变量参数化中,性状 T 的方差分解是调节因子 M 的函数。我们表明,如果 M 和 T 相关,并且双胞胎之间的调节因子 M 也相关,那么单变量参数化会导致假阳性调节效应显著增加。如果调节因子 M 和 T 之间的协方差本身不受调节的影响,那么对这种单变量调节模型进行简单扩展,可以防止假阳性率的升高。如果 M 和 T 之间的协方差随 M 而变化,那么在单变量环境中观察到的调节效应应该谨慎解释,因为这些效应可能源于 M 和 T 之间的协方差的调节,或者源于 T 的独特路径的调节。我们得出的结论是,研究人员应该使用完整的双变量调节模型来研究 M 和 T 之间的协方差是否存在调节作用。如果可以排除这种调节作用,那么建议使用本文提出的扩展的单变量调节模型,因为该模型比完整的双变量调节模型更有效。