University of Texas School of Public Health, Dallas Regional Campus, Dallas, TX, USA.
Addiction. 2012 Jan;107(1):60-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03567.x. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
To examine the proportion of self-reported alcohol consumed by different gender and age groups in Brazil over the past year, and to examine whether the 'prevention paradox' applies to Brazilian data on alcohol-related problems.
A multi-stage cluster sample, representative of the Brazilian household population.
This study was conducted in Brazil between November 2005 and April 2006.
Respondents were aged ≥ 14 years (n = 3007).
Measures included past year estimates of (i) number of standard drinks, (ii) frequency of binge drinking, and (iii) alcohol-related problems.
The survey response rate was 66.4%. The top 2.5% of the drinkers by volume consume 14.9%, the top 5% consume 27.4% and the top 10% consume 44.2% of all alcohol consumed in Brazil. Men consume 77.8% of the total alcohol, and 18-29-year-olds consume 40.3%. Individuals below risky drinking guidelines for weekly volumetric intake account for 49-50% of all problem drinkers and 45-47% of all problem types reported. Individuals who do not binge or who binge infrequently (1-3 times/year) account for 50-51% of all problem drinkers and 45-46% of all reported problem types. Most binge drinkers are low-volume drinkers.
Consistent with the prevention paradox literature, most drinking problems in Brazil are associated with low or moderate drinking. Binge drinking accounts more clearly for the distribution of alcohol problems than total volume consumed.
调查过去一年中巴西不同性别和年龄组报告的饮酒量比例,并检验“预防悖论”是否适用于巴西的酒精相关问题数据。
多阶段聚类样本,代表巴西家庭人口。
本研究于 2005 年 11 月至 2006 年 4 月在巴西进行。
年龄≥14 岁的受访者(n=3007)。
包括过去一年的(i)标准饮料数量估计、(ii)狂饮频率和(iii)酒精相关问题的估计。
调查的回复率为 66.4%。按体积计算,前 2.5%的饮酒者消费了 14.9%,前 5%的饮酒者消费了 27.4%,前 10%的饮酒者消费了巴西所有酒精的 44.2%。男性消费了总酒精的 77.8%,18-29 岁的年轻人消费了 40.3%。低于每周体积摄入量风险指南的个体占所有问题饮酒者的 49-50%,占所有报告问题类型的 45-47%。不狂饮或很少狂饮(每年 1-3 次)的个体占所有问题饮酒者的 50-51%,占所有报告问题类型的 45-46%。大多数狂饮者是低量饮酒者。
与预防悖论文献一致,巴西的大多数饮酒问题与低或中度饮酒有关。狂饮更清楚地说明了酒精问题的分布,而不是总饮酒量。