Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-Pierre, 322 rue Haute, 1000, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jan;20(1):48-61. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1614-x. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
Is it rational to recommend surgical reconstruction of the torn anterior cruciate ligament to every patient? Is conservative management still a valid option?
Through a literature review, we looked for the arguments from each side and checked their validity.
Unfortunately results of most studies cannot be compared because of the following reasons not exhaustively cited: studied populations differed with respect to age, sex, professional and sports activity level, lesions associated with ACL rupture, patient recruitment methods, time from injury to treatment and different therapeutic modalities. Furthermore, various methods were used to evaluate the clinical and radiological results and there was no consensus of their interpretation. Some authors assumed that the incidence of further meniscus lesions could probably be reduced if the torn ACL was surgically reconstructed. But, we have no evidence to believe that this would be due to the surgical repair rather than to a decrease of involvement in strenuous activities. At present it is not demonstrated that ACL-plasty can prevent osteoarthritis. Numerous factors could explain evolution to arthrosis whatever the treatment for the ACL-ruptured knee. Studies comparing surgical and conservative treatments confirm that ACL reconstruction is not the pre-requisite for returning to sporting activities. More recent and scientifically well-designed studies demonstrate that conservative treatment could give satisfactory results for many patients. They suggest some methods to help them choose the best treatment.
At present there are no evidence-based arguments to recommend a systematic surgical reconstruction to any patient who tore his ACL. Knee stability can be improved not only by surgery but also by neuromuscular rehabilitation. Whatever the treatment, fully normal knee kinematics are not restored. While the patients wish to go back to their sport and want everything possible done to prolong their ability to perform these activities, they should be informed that the risk of further knee lesions and osteoarthritis remains high, whatever the treatment, surgical or conservative.
Systematic review of Level I, II, III and IV studies, Level IV.
向每位前交叉韧带撕裂患者推荐手术重建是否合理?保守治疗仍然是一个有效的选择吗?
通过文献回顾,我们寻找了双方的论点,并检查了它们的有效性。
不幸的是,由于以下原因,大多数研究的结果无法进行比较,这些原因并未详尽列出:研究人群在年龄、性别、职业和运动水平、与 ACL 撕裂相关的损伤、患者招募方法、受伤至治疗的时间以及不同的治疗方式等方面存在差异。此外,各种方法用于评估临床和影像学结果,但其解释没有达成共识。一些作者假设,如果撕裂的 ACL 进行手术重建,可能会减少半月板进一步损伤的发生。但是,我们没有证据表明这是由于手术修复,而不是由于减少了剧烈活动的参与。目前还没有证据表明 ACL 成形术可以预防骨关节炎。无论治疗 ACL 撕裂的膝关节,许多因素都可能导致关节炎的发展。比较手术和保守治疗的研究证实,ACL 重建不是重返运动活动的先决条件。更新和科学设计良好的研究表明,保守治疗可以为许多患者提供满意的结果。它们提出了一些方法来帮助他们选择最佳治疗方法。
目前,没有基于证据的论点可以推荐对撕裂 ACL 的任何患者进行系统的手术重建。膝关节稳定性不仅可以通过手术,还可以通过神经肌肉康复来改善。无论治疗方法如何,都不能完全恢复正常的膝关节运动学。虽然患者希望回到他们的运动中,并希望尽一切可能延长他们进行这些活动的能力,但他们应该被告知,无论治疗方法是手术还是保守,进一步的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎的风险仍然很高。
对 I、II、III 和 IV 级研究进行系统评价,IV 级。