Suppr超能文献

生物陶瓷封闭剂对成骨细胞的生物学特性:一项对比研究。

Biological Properties of Bioceramic Sealers on Osteoblastic Cells: A Comparative Study.

作者信息

Guerra Angelita Piovezana, Gregorio Danielle, Yamamoto Gean Carlos, Santos Nathalia Thalitha Bernardes Dos, Poli-Frederico Regina Celia, Maia Luciana Prado

机构信息

Graduate Program in Dentistry, University of North Parana (UNOPAR), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.

Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of North Parana (UNOPAR), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Dent J. 2024 Dec 16;35:e246037. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202406037. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the biological properties of two ready-to-use bioceramic sealers (EndoSequence BC Sealer - EBCS; Bio-C Sealer - BCS) on osteoblastic lineage cells. MC3T3 osteoblast-like cells were exposed to extracts of bioceramic materials. Cytotoxicity was evaluated using the MTT method, genotoxicity was assessed by the micronucleus test and the expression of BMP1, BMP2 and ALP was measured by RT-qPCR, after 1, 3 and 7 days. Wound healing was monitored at 1, 2 and 3-day intervals using the scratch test. Statistical analysis involved a two-factor ANOVA, followed by the Tukey Test for multiple comparisons (α=0.05). Cytotoxicity assessment revealed no significant differences between the materials and the control group at any of the time points, indicating that neither material exhibited cytotoxic effects. However, both cements induced greater micronuclei formation compared to the control on days 1 and 7 (p<0.05) when evaluating genotoxicity. No significant differences between the groups were observed in wound healing at any of the time intervals. Both biomaterials upregulated the expression of BMP1, BMP2 and ALP. The two bioceramic sealers exhibited comparable biological properties, including cytocompatibility, promotion of wound healing, and upregulation of bone formation-related genes in osteoblast-like cells. While these results suggest the potential for safe clinical application, the observed genotoxicity warrants caution. Therefore, while the null hypothesis-that the two bioceramic sealers exhibit analogous properties-was accepted in terms of cytocompatibility and gene expression, further investigation is essential to fully ensure their safety and efficacy in bone-related procedures.

摘要

本研究旨在评估两种即用型生物陶瓷封闭剂(EndoSequence BC封闭剂-EBCS;Bio-C封闭剂-BCS)对成骨细胞系细胞的生物学特性。将MC3T3成骨样细胞暴露于生物陶瓷材料提取物中。使用MTT法评估细胞毒性,通过微核试验评估遗传毒性,并在第1、3和7天通过RT-qPCR测量BMP1、BMP2和ALP的表达。使用划痕试验每隔1、2和3天监测伤口愈合情况。统计分析采用双因素方差分析,随后进行Tukey多重比较检验(α=0.05)。细胞毒性评估显示,在任何时间点,材料与对照组之间均无显著差异,表明两种材料均未表现出细胞毒性作用。然而,在评估遗传毒性时,与对照组相比,两种骨水泥在第1天和第7天均诱导了更多的微核形成(p<0.05)。在任何时间间隔的伤口愈合方面,各实验组之间均未观察到显著差异。两种生物材料均上调了BMP1、BMP2和ALP的表达。这两种生物陶瓷封闭剂表现出相当的生物学特性,包括细胞相容性、促进伤口愈合以及上调成骨样细胞中骨形成相关基因的表达。虽然这些结果表明其具有安全临床应用的潜力,但观察到的遗传毒性值得谨慎对待。因此,虽然在细胞相容性和基因表达方面接受了零假设——即两种生物陶瓷封闭剂具有类似特性,但进一步研究对于充分确保它们在骨相关手术中的安全性和有效性至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c88c/11654336/46ad449742a1/1806-4760-bdj-35-e24-6037-gf1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验