• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预混硅酸钙基根管封闭剂比AH Plus具有更好的生物学性能:一项对体内动物研究和实验室研究的系统评价与荟萃分析。

Premixed calcium silicate-based root canal sealers have better biological properties than AH Plus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo animal studies and laboratory studies.

作者信息

Malta Cristiana Pereira, Santi Samantha Simoni, Barcelos Raquel Cristine Silva, Zanatta Fabrício Batistin, Bier Carlos Alexandre Souza, Morgental Renata Dornelles

机构信息

Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Apr;27(4):345-359. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_24_24. Epub 2024 Apr 5.

DOI:10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_24_24
PMID:38779200
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11108423/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to determine whether premixed calcium silicate-based root canal sealers have better biological properties than AH Plus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Searches of studies published up to January 2023 were performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE and via other methods (databases of the International Endodontic Journal, Journal of Endodontics, and gray literature). The inclusion criteria were animal and studies that analyzed the response in the dorsal subcutaneous tissue of rats, cell viability, and genotoxicity. Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation Risk of Bias (RoB) tool for studies and modified CONSORT checklist for were appraised. Meta-analysis was performed using the Stata.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies were included. In the RoB, studies fulfilled 20%-50% of the items and 60%-100%. The studies included in the meta-analysis demonstrated better histocompatibility with the premixed calcium silicate-based sealers at 30 days and greater cell viability with these sealers when used in undiluted extracts in experimental period of 72 h and in extracts with 1:2 and 1:4 dilution in 24 and 72 h. In contrast, no difference between materials was found concerning genotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Premixed calcium silicate-based root canal sealers have better histocompatibility and are less cytotoxic than the epoxy resin-based sealer AH Plus, demonstrating favorable biological behavior.

摘要

目的

旨在确定预混硅酸钙基根管封闭剂是否比AH Plus具有更好的生物学性能。

材料与方法

检索截至2023年1月发表的研究,检索数据库包括PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE,并通过其他方法(国际牙髓病学杂志、牙髓病学杂志数据库及灰色文献)进行检索。纳入标准为动物研究以及分析大鼠背部皮下组织反应、细胞活力和遗传毒性的研究。使用实验室动物实验偏倚风险(RoB)工具对研究进行评估,并对随机对照试验使用改良的CONSORT清单进行评估。使用Stata进行荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入52项研究。在偏倚风险评估中,部分研究满足20%-50%的条目,部分研究满足60%-100%。荟萃分析纳入的研究表明,预混硅酸钙基封闭剂在30天时具有更好的组织相容性,在72小时实验期的未稀释提取物以及24小时和72小时1:2和1:4稀释的提取物中使用时,这些封闭剂具有更高的细胞活力。相比之下,在遗传毒性方面未发现材料之间存在差异。

结论

预混硅酸钙基根管封闭剂比环氧树脂基封闭剂AH Plus具有更好的组织相容性,细胞毒性更小,表现出良好的生物学行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a6/11108423/7b9b14e50604/JCDE-27-345-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a6/11108423/348f74c7c5ec/JCDE-27-345-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a6/11108423/af7f8b81c4b5/JCDE-27-345-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a6/11108423/357075b30d3b/JCDE-27-345-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a6/11108423/7b9b14e50604/JCDE-27-345-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a6/11108423/348f74c7c5ec/JCDE-27-345-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a6/11108423/af7f8b81c4b5/JCDE-27-345-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a6/11108423/357075b30d3b/JCDE-27-345-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a6/11108423/7b9b14e50604/JCDE-27-345-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Premixed calcium silicate-based root canal sealers have better biological properties than AH Plus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo animal studies and laboratory studies.预混硅酸钙基根管封闭剂比AH Plus具有更好的生物学性能:一项对体内动物研究和实验室研究的系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Apr;27(4):345-359. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_24_24. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
2
Dislodgment Resistance of Bioceramic and Epoxy Sealers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.生物陶瓷和环氧树脂封闭剂抗脱位能力的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2019 Sep;19(3):221-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
3
Are Premixed Calcium Silicate-based Endodontic Sealers Comparable to Conventional Materials? A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.预混硅酸钙类根管封闭剂与传统材料相当吗?一项体外研究的系统评价。
J Endod. 2017 Apr;43(4):527-535. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.019. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
4
Chemical-Physical Properties and Bioactivity of New Premixed Calcium Silicate-Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers.新型预混硅酸钙-生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的理化性能及生物活性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 11;23(22):13914. doi: 10.3390/ijms232213914.
5
Solubility of bioceramic- and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.生物陶瓷和环氧树脂类根管封闭剂的溶解性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Aust Endod J. 2021 Dec;47(3):690-702. doi: 10.1111/aej.12487. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
6
The Use of Premixed Calcium Silicate Bioceramic Sealer with Warm Carrier-Based Technique: A 2-Year Study for Patients Treated in a Master Program.预混硅酸钙生物陶瓷封闭剂与热载体技术的应用:一项针对在硕士项目中接受治疗的患者的为期两年的研究。
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Mar 18;14(3):164. doi: 10.3390/jfb14030164.
7
Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealer on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.硅酸钙基封闭剂与环氧树脂基封闭剂对人牙周膜干细胞生物相容性的比较
Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 20;13(22):5242. doi: 10.3390/ma13225242.
8
Evaluation of the Cytotoxicity and Biocompatibility of New Resin Epoxy-based Endodontic Sealer Containing Calcium Hydroxide.评价含氢氧化钙的新型树脂基环氧型根管封闭剂的细胞毒性和生物相容性。
J Endod. 2017 Dec;43(12):2088-2092. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
9
In Vitro Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂生物相容性的体外比较
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jul 29;12(15):2411. doi: 10.3390/ma12152411.
10
Retreatability of three calcium silicate-containing sealers and one epoxy resin-based root canal sealer with four different root canal instruments.四种不同根管器械对 3 种含硅酸钙类根管封闭剂和 1 种环氧树脂类根管封闭剂的可取出性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):811-817. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2156-5. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of efficacy of SmartLite Pro EndoActivator sonic activation using adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence meter: A randomized clinical trial.使用三磷酸腺苷生物发光仪评估SmartLite Pro根管激活器声波激活效果的随机临床试验。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Jul;28(7):619-625. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_235_25. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Evaluation of the Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity of Bioceramic Endodontic Sealers in HepG2 and V79 Cell Lines: An In Vitro Study Using the Comet and Micronucleus Assays.生物陶瓷根管封闭剂在HepG2和V79细胞系中的遗传毒性和细胞毒性评估:使用彗星试验和微核试验的体外研究
J Funct Biomater. 2025 May 9;16(5):169. doi: 10.3390/jfb16050169.
3

本文引用的文献

1
In vitro inflammatory modulation of bioceramic endodontic sealer in macrophages stimulated by bacterial lipopolysaccharide.在细菌脂多糖刺激的巨噬细胞中对生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的体外炎症调节作用。
Int Endod J. 2023 Feb;56(2):213-226. doi: 10.1111/iej.13858. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
2
Physicochemical and Biological Properties of AH Plus Bioceramic.AH Plus 生物陶瓷的理化及生物学性能。
J Endod. 2023 Jan;49(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.10.009. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
3
In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Mineralization Potential of an Endodontic Bioceramic Material.
Comparative evaluation of physicochemical properties of various root canal sealers: An study.
各种根管封闭剂物理化学性质的比较评价:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Apr;28(4):325-330. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_866_24. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
4
Effect of indirect ultrasonic activation on the root canal obturation with premixed calcium silicate cement: an in vitro study.间接超声激活对预混硅酸钙水门汀根管充填的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05748-2.
5
Sealing ability of three bioceramic sealers using sealer-based obturation method after immersion in simulated body fluid.三种生物陶瓷封闭剂在模拟体液中浸泡后采用基于封闭剂的充填方法的封闭能力。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Feb;28(2):199-203. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_605_24. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
6
Endodontic Treatment of an Upper Lateral Incisor with Oehlers' Type II Dens Invaginatus: A Case Report.伴有奥勒斯Ⅱ型牙内陷的上颌侧切牙的根管治疗:一例报告
Iran Endod J. 2025;20(1):e7. doi: 10.22037/iej.v20i1.46131. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
7
Physicochemical properties and biological interaction of calcium silicate-based sealers - in vivo model.硅酸钙基封闭剂的物理化学性质及生物相互作用——体内模型
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 25;29(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06150-6.
一种牙髓生物陶瓷材料的体外细胞毒性和矿化潜力
Eur J Dent. 2023 May;17(2):548-555. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750778. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
4
Cytocompatibility and bioactive potential of AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer: An in vitro study.AH Plus 生物陶瓷糊剂的细胞相容性和生物活性潜力:一项体外研究。
Int Endod J. 2022 Oct;55(10):1066-1080. doi: 10.1111/iej.13805. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
5
Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity Comparison of Calcium Silicate-Based and Resin-Based Sealers on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.基于硅酸钙和树脂基封闭剂对人牙周膜干细胞的遗传毒性和细胞毒性比较。
Eur Endod J. 2022 Jun;7(2):129-134. doi: 10.14744/eej.2022.09326.
6
A comprehensive in vitro comparison of the biological and physicochemical properties of bioactive root canal sealers.一种生物活性根管封闭剂的生物学和理化性能的全面体外比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Oct;26(10):6209-6222. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04570-2. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
7
Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain and periapical healing after root canal treatment using three different base endodontic sealers - A randomized control clinical trial.使用三种不同的根管封闭剂进行根管治疗后术后疼痛和根尖周愈合的比较评估——一项随机对照临床试验
J Clin Exp Dent. 2022 Feb 1;14(2):e144-e152. doi: 10.4317/jced.59034. eCollection 2022 Feb.
8
A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study biocompatibility of endodontic materials.根管材料生物相容性研究方法和实验模型的批判性分析。
Int Endod J. 2022 Apr;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):346-369. doi: 10.1111/iej.13701. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
9
Evaluation of the biological and physicochemical properties of calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers.评估基于硅酸钙和环氧树脂的根管封闭剂的生物和理化性能。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2022 Jun;110(6):1344-1353. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35004. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
10
Physicochemical Properties, Cytocompatibility and Antibiofilm Activity of a New Calcium Silicate Sealer.一种新型硅酸钙封固剂的理化性能、细胞相容性和抗生物膜活性。
Braz Dent J. 2021 Jul-Aug;32(4):8-18. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202103314.