• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于硅酸钙和树脂基封闭剂对人牙周膜干细胞的遗传毒性和细胞毒性比较。

Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity Comparison of Calcium Silicate-Based and Resin-Based Sealers on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul-UFRGS Faculty of Dentistry, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Department of Dentistry, Ibirapuera University (UNIB) Faculty of Dentistry, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Eur Endod J. 2022 Jun;7(2):129-134. doi: 10.14744/eej.2022.09326.

DOI:10.14744/eej.2022.09326
PMID:35786579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9285993/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of Sealer Plus BC (SBC), AH Plus (AHP) and MTA Fillapex (MTF).

METHODS

Human periodontal ligament dental stem cells (hPDLSCs) from third molars were isolated and cultured in a clonogenic medium. Cells were maintained in an incubator, and cell growth was monitored daily. hPDLSCs were characterised under flow cytometry and stem cell surface markers. The tested groups were a control group, SBC, AHP and MTF. Each sealer was prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions and placed in a clonogenic medium to produce a conditioned media. Conditioned media were then diluted to 10% to be placed in contact with culture cells in cell viability assay afterwards. The cells were harvested and plated into 96 wells culture plates. Genotoxicity was assessed by evaluation of micronucleus formation and cytotoxicity by MTT-based assay. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Data normality was verified by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Statistical analysis for genotoxicity was performed with Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests and two-way ANOVA for cytotoxicity, both with a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

Cells expressed typical levels of mesenchymal stem cell surface markers. No differences in the number of micronuclei were observed among all groups (P>0.05). In all periods analysed (24, 48, and 72 h), the sealers presented statistically different results for cell viability (P<0.05), with SBC presenting the lowest cytotoxicity, followed by the control group, MTF, and AHP.

CONCLUSION

All sealers presented low genotoxicity, and Sealer Plus BC presented the lowest cytotoxicity.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估 Sealer Plus BC(SBC)、AH Plus(AHP)和 MTA Fillapex(MTF)的遗传毒性和细胞毒性。

方法

从第三磨牙中分离和培养人牙周膜牙髓干细胞(hPDLSCs)于集落形成培养基中。将细胞置于孵育箱中,每天监测细胞生长情况。通过流式细胞术和干细胞表面标志物对 hPDLSCs 进行鉴定。实验组为对照组、SBC、AHP 和 MTF。根据制造商的说明制备每种密封剂,并将其放置在集落形成培养基中以产生条件培养基。然后将条件培养基稀释至 10%,与细胞活力测定中的培养细胞接触。收集细胞并接种于 96 孔培养板中。通过评估微核形成来评估遗传毒性,通过 MTT 法评估细胞毒性。所有实验均重复 3 次。通过 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 检验验证数据正态性。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Dunn 检验进行遗传毒性的统计分析,采用双向方差分析进行细胞毒性的统计分析,均具有 5%的显著性水平。

结果

细胞表达典型的间充质干细胞表面标志物。所有组之间的微核数量均无差异(P>0.05)。在所有分析的时间段(24、48 和 72 h),密封剂的细胞活力均呈现出统计学差异(P<0.05),其中 SBC 的细胞毒性最低,其次是对照组、MTF 和 AHP。

结论

所有密封剂的遗传毒性均较低,而 Sealer Plus BC 的细胞毒性最低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca18/9285993/9de64745c149/EEJ-7-129-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca18/9285993/d64c70cd7df7/EEJ-7-129-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca18/9285993/e6fda1978b2e/EEJ-7-129-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca18/9285993/9de64745c149/EEJ-7-129-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca18/9285993/d64c70cd7df7/EEJ-7-129-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca18/9285993/e6fda1978b2e/EEJ-7-129-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca18/9285993/9de64745c149/EEJ-7-129-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity Comparison of Calcium Silicate-Based and Resin-Based Sealers on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.基于硅酸钙和树脂基封闭剂对人牙周膜干细胞的遗传毒性和细胞毒性比较。
Eur Endod J. 2022 Jun;7(2):129-134. doi: 10.14744/eej.2022.09326.
2
Evaluation of cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers and their effects on the biological responses of mesenchymal dental stem cells.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的细胞相容性及其对间充质牙干细胞生物学反应的影响评估。
Int Endod J. 2017 Jan;50(1):67-76. doi: 10.1111/iej.12596. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
3
Comparative bioactivity and immunomodulatory potential of the new Bioroot Flow and AH Plus Bioceramic sealer: An in vitro study on hPDLSCs.新型 Bioroot Flow 和 AH Plus Bioceramic 根管封闭剂的比较生物活性和免疫调节潜力:对人牙周膜干细胞的体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 5;28(3):195. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05593-7.
4
Biocompatibility of three new calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers on human periodontal ligament stem cells.三种新型硅酸钙基根管封闭剂对人牙周膜干细胞的生物相容性。
Int Endod J. 2017 Sep;50(9):875-884. doi: 10.1111/iej.12703. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
5
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of salicylate- and calcium silicate-based root canal sealers on primer human periodontal ligament fibroblasts.基于水杨酸盐和硅酸钙的根管封闭剂对原代人牙周膜成纤维细胞的细胞毒性和遗传毒性
Aust Endod J. 2021 Dec;47(3):645-653. doi: 10.1111/aej.12537. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Root Canal Sealers on Cultured Human Periodontal Fibroblasts: In vitro Study.根管封闭剂对培养的人牙周膜成纤维细胞细胞毒性的比较评价:体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jul 1;19(7):847-852.
7
Cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow2, MTA Fillapex, and AH Plus on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.GuttaFlow Bioseal、GuttaFlow2、MTA Fillapex 和 AH Plus 对人牙周膜干细胞的细胞毒性。
J Endod. 2017 May;43(5):816-822. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
8
Evaluation of the biocompatibility of root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament cells ex vivo.评价根管封闭剂对人牙周膜细胞的体外生物相容性。
Odontology. 2019 Jan;107(1):54-63. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0380-3. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
9
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of root canal sealers based on mineral trioxide aggregate.基于三氧化矿物凝聚体的根管封闭剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性。
J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):495-500. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
10
Cytocompatibility and bioactive potential of AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer: An in vitro study.AH Plus 生物陶瓷糊剂的细胞相容性和生物活性潜力:一项体外研究。
Int Endod J. 2022 Oct;55(10):1066-1080. doi: 10.1111/iej.13805. Epub 2022 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity of Bioceramic Endodontic Sealers in HepG2 and V79 Cell Lines: An In Vitro Study Using the Comet and Micronucleus Assays.生物陶瓷根管封闭剂在HepG2和V79细胞系中的遗传毒性和细胞毒性评估:使用彗星试验和微核试验的体外研究
J Funct Biomater. 2025 May 9;16(5):169. doi: 10.3390/jfb16050169.
2
Clinical outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment using different sealers and techniques of obturation in 237 patients: A retrospective study.237 例患者不同密封剂和根管充填技术的非手术根管治疗的临床效果:回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Aug 10;28(9):479. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05871-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the biological and physicochemical properties of calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers.评估基于硅酸钙和环氧树脂的根管封闭剂的生物和理化性能。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2022 Jun;110(6):1344-1353. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35004. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
2
Physicochemical Properties, Cytocompatibility and Antibiofilm Activity of a New Calcium Silicate Sealer.一种新型硅酸钙封固剂的理化性能、细胞相容性和抗生物膜活性。
Braz Dent J. 2021 Jul-Aug;32(4):8-18. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202103314.
3
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of salicylate- and calcium silicate-based root canal sealers on primer human periodontal ligament fibroblasts.
Premixed calcium silicate-based root canal sealers have better biological properties than AH Plus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo animal studies and laboratory studies.
预混硅酸钙基根管封闭剂比AH Plus具有更好的生物学性能:一项对体内动物研究和实验室研究的系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Apr;27(4):345-359. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_24_24. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
4
Genotoxicity induced by endodontic sealers: A systematic review.牙髓封闭剂引起的遗传毒性:一项系统评价。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Feb;36(2):249-257. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.11.019. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
5
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of bioceramic root canal sealers compared to conventional resin-based sealer.与传统树脂基根管封闭剂相比,生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 19;14(1):4124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54726-1.
6
Evaluation of the genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and bioactivity of calcium silicate-based cements.评估硅酸钙基水泥的遗传毒性、细胞毒性和生物活性。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 20;24(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03891-w.
7
Biological properties of Ceraputty as a retrograde filling material: an in vitro study on hPDLSCs.Ceraputty 作为逆行充填材料的生物学特性:一项对人牙周膜干细胞的体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Aug;27(8):4233-4243. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05040-z. Epub 2023 May 1.
基于水杨酸盐和硅酸钙的根管封闭剂对原代人牙周膜成纤维细胞的细胞毒性和遗传毒性
Aust Endod J. 2021 Dec;47(3):645-653. doi: 10.1111/aej.12537. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
4
Genotoxicity of root canal sealers: a literature review.根管封闭剂的遗传毒性:文献综述。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Oct;24(10):3347-3362. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03478-z. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
5
Chemical composition and bioactivity potential of the new Endosequence BC Sealer formulation HiFlow.新型 Endosequence BC Sealer 配方 HiFlow 的化学成分和生物活性潜力。
Int Endod J. 2020 Sep;53(9):1216-1228. doi: 10.1111/iej.13327. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
6
Comparative Cytocompatibility and Mineralization Potential of Bio-C Sealer and TotalFill BC Sealer.生物C封闭剂与TotalFill BC封闭剂的细胞相容性和矿化潜力比较
Materials (Basel). 2019 Sep 22;12(19):3087. doi: 10.3390/ma12193087.
7
Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of a new bioceramic endodontic sealer containing calcium hydroxide.一种含氢氧化钙的新型生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的细胞毒性和生物相容性
Braz Oral Res. 2019;33:e042. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0042. Epub 2019 May 16.
8
The impact of sealer extrusion on endodontic outcome: A systematic review with meta-analysis.封闭剂挤出对根管治疗结果的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Aust Endod J. 2020 Apr;46(1):123-129. doi: 10.1111/aej.12370. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
9
In Vitro Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂生物相容性的体外比较
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jul 29;12(15):2411. doi: 10.3390/ma12152411.
10
Evaluation of Physicochemical Properties of New Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer.新型硅酸钙基封闭剂的物理化学性质评估
Braz Dent J. 2018 Nov-Dec;29(6):536-540. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201802088.