• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物医学信息学因果推断研究综述。

A review of causal inference for biomedical informatics.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2011 Dec;44(6):1102-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2011.07.001
PMID:21782035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3219814/
Abstract

Causality is an important concept throughout the health sciences and is particularly vital for informatics work such as finding adverse drug events or risk factors for disease using electronic health records. While philosophers and scientists working for centuries on formalizing what makes something a cause have not reached a consensus, new methods for inference show that we can make progress in this area in many practical cases. This article reviews core concepts in understanding and identifying causality and then reviews current computational methods for inference and explanation, focusing on inference from large-scale observational data. While the problem is not fully solved, we show that graphical models and Granger causality provide useful frameworks for inference and that a more recent approach based on temporal logic addresses some of the limitations of these methods.

摘要

因果关系是整个健康科学领域的一个重要概念,对于使用电子健康记录查找药物不良反应或疾病风险因素等信息学工作尤为重要。虽然哲学家和科学家们几个世纪以来一直在努力形式化什么是原因,但新的推理方法表明,在许多实际情况下,我们可以在这个领域取得进展。本文回顾了理解和识别因果关系的核心概念,然后回顾了当前用于推理和解释的计算方法,重点是从大规模观察数据中进行推理。虽然这个问题还没有完全解决,但我们表明图形模型和格兰杰因果关系为推理提供了有用的框架,并且基于时间逻辑的最新方法解决了这些方法的一些局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f00/3219814/f51fb0d801a5/nihms311782f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f00/3219814/0dba15f34f0a/nihms311782f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f00/3219814/3cbec7cb485a/nihms311782f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f00/3219814/a8406b36ed90/nihms311782f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f00/3219814/254d5050db96/nihms311782f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f00/3219814/d42be52e662f/nihms311782f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f00/3219814/ac34d8e924e8/nihms311782f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f00/3219814/f51fb0d801a5/nihms311782f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f00/3219814/0dba15f34f0a/nihms311782f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f00/3219814/3cbec7cb485a/nihms311782f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f00/3219814/a8406b36ed90/nihms311782f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f00/3219814/254d5050db96/nihms311782f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f00/3219814/d42be52e662f/nihms311782f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f00/3219814/ac34d8e924e8/nihms311782f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f00/3219814/f51fb0d801a5/nihms311782f7.jpg

相似文献

1
A review of causal inference for biomedical informatics.生物医学信息学因果推断研究综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Dec;44(6):1102-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
2
Causation and causal inference in epidemiology.流行病学中的因果关系与因果推断
Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S144-50. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.059204.
3
A supervised adverse drug reaction signalling framework imitating Bradford Hill's causality considerations.一个模仿布拉德福德·希尔因果关系考量的药物不良反应信号监测框架。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Aug;56:356-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
4
Quantifying Evidence for-and against-Granger Causality with Bayes Factors.用量化贝叶斯因子来衡量格兰杰因果关系的证据。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2024 Nov-Dec;59(6):1148-1158. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2023.2214890. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
5
Granger causality vs. dynamic Bayesian network inference: a comparative study.格兰杰因果关系与动态贝叶斯网络推理:一项比较研究。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Apr 24;10:122. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-122.
6
A novel method for predicting the progression rate of ALS disease based on automatic generation of probabilistic causal chains.基于概率因果链自动生成的 ALS 疾病进展率预测新方法。
Artif Intell Med. 2020 Jul;107:101879. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101879. Epub 2020 May 22.
7
A Narrative Review of Methods for Causal Inference and Associated Educational Resources.因果推断方法及相关教育资源的叙述性综述。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2020 Oct/Dec;29(4):260-269. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000276.
8
Modernizing the Bradford Hill criteria for assessing causal relationships in observational data.将 Bradford Hill 因果关系评估标准现代化,用于观察性数据。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018 Sep;48(8):682-712. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1518404. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
9
Precision psychiatry needs causal inference.精准精神病学需要因果推断。
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2024 Oct 17;37:e32. doi: 10.1017/neu.2024.29.
10
[Causal inference in medicine--a historical view in epidemiology].[医学中的因果推断——流行病学的历史视角]
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 1996 Jul;51(2):558-68. doi: 10.1265/jjh.51.558.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning driven biomarker selection for medical diagnosis.用于医学诊断的机器学习驱动的生物标志物选择。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 11;20(6):e0322620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322620. eCollection 2025.
2
Developing a novel causal inference algorithm for personalized biomedical causal graph learning using meta machine learning.利用元机器学习开发个性化生物医学因果图学习的新因果推理算法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 May 27;24(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02510-6.
3
Opportunities for incorporating intersectionality into biomedical informatics.将交叉性纳入生物医学信息学的机会。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Jun;154:104653. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104653. Epub 2024 May 10.
4
Assessing the effect of () (Linnaeus, 1762) control based on machine learning for predicting the spatiotemporal distribution of eggs in ovitraps.基于机器学习评估()(林奈,1762年)控制对预测诱蚊产卵器中蚊卵时空分布的效果。
Dialogues Health. 2022 Feb 9;1:100003. doi: 10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100003. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Evaluating Large Language Models in Extracting Cognitive Exam Dates and Scores.评估大型语言模型在提取认知测试日期和分数方面的能力。
medRxiv. 2024 Feb 13:2023.07.10.23292373. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.10.23292373.
6
A Comprehensive Framework for Measuring the Immediate Impact of TV Advertisements: TV-Impact.衡量电视广告即时影响的综合框架:电视影响力
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Jan 25;26(2):109. doi: 10.3390/e26020109.
7
Automated detection of causal relationships among diseases and imaging findings in textual radiology reports.自动检测文本放射学报告中疾病与影像学表现之间的因果关系。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Sep 25;30(10):1701-1706. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad119.
8
Causal Criteria in Medical and Biological Disciplines: History, Essence, and Radiation Aspects. Report 4, Part 1: The Post-Hill Criteria and Ecolgoical Criteria.医学与生物学科中的因果标准:历史、本质及辐射方面。报告4,第1部分:希尔后标准与生态学标准。
Biol Bull Russ Acad Sci. 2022;49(12):2423-2466. doi: 10.1134/S1062359022120068. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
9
Big Data to Knowledge: Application of Machine Learning to Predictive Modeling of Therapeutic Response in Cancer.从大数据到知识:机器学习在癌症治疗反应预测建模中的应用
Curr Genomics. 2021 Dec 16;22(4):244-266. doi: 10.2174/1389202921999201224110101.
10
Causal Datasheet for Datasets: An Evaluation Guide for Real-World Data Analysis and Data Collection Design Using Bayesian Networks.数据集因果数据表:使用贝叶斯网络进行现实世界数据分析和数据收集设计的评估指南。
Front Artif Intell. 2021 Apr 14;4:612551. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.612551. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The evolution of population science: advent of the mega cohort.人口科学的演变:大型队列的出现。
JAMA. 2010 Nov 24;304(20):2288-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1691.
2
Redundant causation from a sufficient cause perspective.从充分病因的角度看冗余因果关系。
Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2010 Aug 2;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1742-5573-7-5.
3
Prediction modeling using EHR data: challenges, strategies, and a comparison of machine learning approaches.使用电子健康记录数据进行预测建模:挑战、策略和机器学习方法比较。
Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S106-13. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181de9e17.
4
The limitations of randomized controlled trials in predicting effectiveness.随机对照试验在预测疗效方面的局限性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Apr;16(2):260-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01382.x.
5
Variational causal claims in epidemiology.流行病学中的变分因果关系声明。
Perspect Biol Med. 2009 Autumn;52(4):540-54. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0118.
6
On the use of dynamic Bayesian networks in reconstructing functional neuronal networks from spike train ensembles.基于尖峰神经元集合重建功能神经元网络的动态贝叶斯网络方法
Neural Comput. 2010 Jan;22(1):158-89. doi: 10.1162/neco.2009.11-08-900.
7
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: analytic methods to improve causal inference from nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part III.比较实效研究的良好研究实践:利用二次数据源提高非随机治疗效果研究中因果推断的分析方法:ISPOR 回顾性数据库分析良好研究实践工作组报告--第三部分。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1062-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00602.x. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
8
The role of causal criteria in causal inferences: Bradford Hill's "aspects of association".因果标准在因果推断中的作用:布拉德福德·希尔的“关联的各个方面”
Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2009 Jun 17;6:2. doi: 10.1186/1742-5573-6-2.
9
Granger causality vs. dynamic Bayesian network inference: a comparative study.格兰杰因果关系与动态贝叶斯网络推理:一项比较研究。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Apr 24;10:122. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-122.
10
How to assess the external validity of therapeutic trials: a conceptual approach.如何评估治疗试验的外部有效性:概念方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;39(1):89-94. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp174. Epub 2009 Apr 17.