de Wit H, McCracken S G
Department of Psychiatry, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1990 Feb;14(1):63-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1990.tb00448.x.
The reinforcing and subjective effects of a low dose of ethanol (ETH; 0.5 g/kg) were investigated in normal males with or without an alcoholic first-degree relative. Reinforcing effects were measured using a double-blind preference procedure comparing ETH to placebo (PLC), and subjective effects were assessed using standardized self-report questionnaires. Subjects with a positive family history of alcoholism (FHP) did not differ from subjects without alcoholic relatives (FHN) either in frequency of choice of ETH over PLC (about 60% of occasions) or in the total dose self-administered (about 0.9 g/kg per session). The two groups also did not differ on most measures of acute ETH effects (e.g., mood-altering effects, liking ratings, behavioral changes, or blood ETH levels). The FHP subjects reported a slightly faster onset of "feeling any drug effects" and "high" after ETH than the FHN group. The FHP group also scored higher than the FHN group on several scales indicative of dysphoric mood, regardless of drug administration. Thus, under these conditions male social drinkers with or without a family history of alcoholism did not differ either in preference for ETH or in their subjective responses to the drug.
在有或没有酒精成瘾一级亲属的正常男性中,研究了低剂量乙醇(ETH;0.5克/千克)的强化作用和主观效应。使用双盲偏好程序比较ETH和安慰剂(PLC)来测量强化作用,使用标准化的自我报告问卷评估主观效应。有酒精成瘾家族史阳性(FHP)的受试者与没有酒精成瘾亲属(FHN)的受试者在选择ETH而非PLC的频率(约60%的情况)或自我给药的总剂量(每次约0.9克/千克)方面没有差异。两组在急性ETH效应的大多数测量指标上(例如,情绪改变效应、喜好评分、行为变化或血液ETH水平)也没有差异。FHP受试者报告称,ETH给药后“感觉到任何药物效应”和“兴奋”的起效比FHN组略快。无论是否给药,FHP组在几个表明烦躁情绪的量表上的得分也高于FHN组。因此,在这些条件下,有或没有酒精成瘾家族史的男性社交饮酒者对ETH的偏好或对药物的主观反应没有差异。