• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于互联网的癌症患者互动支持:综合系统是否更佳?

Internet-Based Interactive Support for Cancer Patients: Are Integrated Systems Better?

作者信息

Gustafson David H, Hawkins Robert, McTavish Fiona, Pingree Suzanne, Chen Wei Chih, Volrathongchai Kanittha, Stengle William, Stewart James A, Serlin Ronald C

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering and Preventive Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706-1572.

出版信息

J Commun. 2008 Jun;58(2):238-257. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00383.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00383.x
PMID:21804645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3144782/
Abstract

To compare the benefits of the Internet generally versus a focused system of services, 257 breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to a control group, access to the Internet with links to high-quality breast cancer sites, or access to an eHealth system (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System, CHESS) that integrated information, support, and decision and analysis tools. The intervention lasted 5 months, and self-report data on quality of life, health-care competence, and social support were collected at pretest and at 2-, 4-, and 9-month posttests. CHESS subjects logged on more overall than Internet subjects and accessed more health resources, but the latter used non health-related sites more. Subjects with access to the Internet alone experienced no better outcomes than controls at any of the 3 time points, compared to pretest levels. Subjects with CHESS experienced greater social support during the intervention period and had higher scores on all 3 outcomes at 9 months, 4 months after the intervention ended. CHESS subjects also scored higher than those with Internet access during the intervention period but not significantly after the intervention ended. Thus, CHESS (with one simple interface and integrated information, communication, and skills services) helped newly diagnosed breast cancer patients even after computers were removed. In contrast, patients received little benefit from Internet access, despite having links to a variety of high-quality sites.

摘要

为比较互联网总体上与专注的服务系统的益处,257名乳腺癌患者被随机分配到对照组、可访问带有高质量乳腺癌网站链接的互联网组,或可访问整合了信息、支持以及决策与分析工具的电子健康系统(综合健康增强支持系统,CHESS)组。干预持续5个月,在干预前以及干预后2个月、4个月和9个月收集关于生活质量、医疗保健能力和社会支持的自我报告数据。CHESS组的受试者总体登录次数多于互联网组,访问的健康资源也更多,但互联网组的受试者使用非健康相关网站更多。与干预前水平相比,仅可访问互联网的受试者在3个时间点中的任何一个时间点的结果都不比对照组更好。CHESS组的受试者在干预期间获得了更大的社会支持,并且在干预结束4个月后的9个月时,在所有3项结果上得分更高。CHESS组的受试者在干预期间的得分也高于可访问互联网的受试者,但在干预结束后没有显著差异。因此,CHESS(具有一个简单的界面并整合了信息、通信和技能服务)即使在移除电脑后仍对新诊断的乳腺癌患者有帮助。相比之下,尽管可访问各种高质量网站,但患者从互联网访问中获益甚微。

相似文献

1
Internet-Based Interactive Support for Cancer Patients: Are Integrated Systems Better?基于互联网的癌症患者互动支持:综合系统是否更佳?
J Commun. 2008 Jun;58(2):238-257. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00383.x.
2
Understanding how e-health interventions meet psychosocial needs of breast cancer patients: The pathways of influence on quality of life and cancer concerns.了解电子健康干预措施如何满足乳腺癌患者的心理社会需求:对生活质量和癌症担忧影响的途径。
Psychooncology. 2020 Oct;29(10):1704-1712. doi: 10.1002/pon.5512. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
3
CHESS improves cancer caregivers' burden and mood: results of an eHealth RCT.CHESS 改善癌症照护者的负担和情绪:一项电子健康 RCT 的结果。
Health Psychol. 2014 Oct;33(10):1261-72. doi: 10.1037/a0034216. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
4
The effects of combining Web-based eHealth with telephone nurse case management for pediatric asthma control: a randomized controlled trial.基于网络的电子健康与电话护士病例管理相结合对儿童哮喘控制的效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jul 26;14(4):e101. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1964.
5
How Cancer Patients Use and Benefit from an Interactive Cancer Communication System.癌症患者如何使用交互式癌症沟通系统并从中受益。
J Health Commun. 2017 Oct;22(10):792-799. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1360413. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
6
Use and Impact of eHealth System by Low-income Women With Breast Cancer.低收入乳腺癌女性对电子健康系统的使用及影响
J Health Commun. 2005;10 Suppl 1:195-218. doi: 10.1080/10810730500263257.
7
Smoking cessation via the internet: a randomized clinical trial of an internet intervention as adjuvant treatment in a smoking cessation intervention.通过互联网戒烟:一项关于互联网干预作为戒烟干预辅助治疗的随机临床试验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8 Suppl 1:S59-67. doi: 10.1080/14622200601047900.
8
Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer.计算机支持对年轻乳腺癌女性的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Jul;16(7):435-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007435.x.
9
Optimizing eHealth breast cancer interventions: which types of eHealth services are effective?优化电子健康乳腺癌干预措施:哪些类型的电子健康服务有效?
Transl Behav Med. 2011 Mar;1(1):134-145. doi: 10.1007/s13142-010-0004-0.
10
Creating a bond between caregivers online: effect on caregivers' coping strategies.建立在线护患关系:对护患应对策略的影响。
J Health Commun. 2012;17(2):125-40. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.585687. Epub 2011 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Smart Display Versus Laptop Platforms for an eHealth Intervention to Improve Functional Health for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.智能显示器与笔记本电脑平台用于电子健康干预以改善患有多种慢性病的老年人功能健康的比较:一项随机临床试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 3;14:e64449. doi: 10.2196/64449.
2
Interventions Addressing Health Literacy in Cancer Care: A Systematic Review of Reviews.癌症护理中针对健康素养的干预措施:综述的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 2;22(2):212. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020212.
3
An eHealth Intervention to Improve Quality of Life, Socioemotional, and Health-Related Measures Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Randomized Controlled Trial.一项旨在改善患有多种慢性病的老年人生活质量、社会情感及健康相关指标的电子健康干预措施:随机对照试验
JMIR Aging. 2024 Dec 6;7:e59588. doi: 10.2196/59588.
4
Effects of web-based interventions on quality of life among patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.基于网络的干预措施对乳腺癌患者生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 Sep;13(18):e70230. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70230.
5
Digital Health Platforms for Breast Cancer Care: A Scoping Review.用于乳腺癌护理的数字健康平台:一项范围综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 27;13(7):1937. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071937.
6
Digital Health Psychosocial Intervention in Adult Patients With Cancer and Their Families: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成年癌症患者及其家属的数字健康心理社会干预:系统评价与荟萃分析。
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Feb 5;10:e46116. doi: 10.2196/46116.
7
Information and Communication Technologies to Support Chronic Disease Self-Management: Preconditions for Enhancing the Partnership in Person-Centered Care.支持慢性病自我管理的信息通信技术:加强以患者为中心的护理伙伴关系的前提条件。
J Particip Med. 2017 Jul 7;9(1):e14. doi: 10.2196/jopm.8846.
8
Social media-based interventions for patients with cancer: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised controlled trials.社交媒体为癌症患者提供的干预措施:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Dec;17(6):1606-1627. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01244-6. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
9
Using Smart Displays to Implement an eHealth System for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.使用智能显示器为患有多种慢性病的老年人实施电子健康系统:一项随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 5;11(5):e37522. doi: 10.2196/37522.
10
Electronic Health Interventions for Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.电子健康干预措施在乳腺癌患者中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jul 10;40(20):2257-2270. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01171. Epub 2022 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will?自我调节与人类自主性问题:心理学是否需要选择、自我决定和意志?
J Pers. 2006 Dec;74(6):1557-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x.
2
Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys.互联网健康信息搜索的影响、使用情况及结果:皮尤调查的多变量结果
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Jan;75(1):8-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.032. Epub 2005 Aug 24.
3
Attributes of interactive online health information systems.交互式在线健康信息系统的属性。
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Jul 1;7(3):e33. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.3.e33.
4
General population and cancer patient norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G).癌症治疗功能评估通用量表(FACT-G)的一般人群和癌症患者常模。
Eval Health Prof. 2005 Jun;28(2):192-211. doi: 10.1177/0163278705275341.
5
Online interaction. Effects of storytelling in an internet breast cancer support group.在线互动。互联网乳腺癌支持小组中讲故事的效果。
Psychooncology. 2005 Mar;14(3):211-20. doi: 10.1002/pon.837.
6
The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes.互联网对癌症治疗结果的影响。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2003 Nov-Dec;53(6):356-71. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.53.6.356.
7
Breast cancer treatment in older women: impact of the patient-physician interaction.老年女性乳腺癌治疗:医患互动的影响
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Jul;52(7):1138-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52312.x.
8
Quality of life among older survivors of breast cancer.老年乳腺癌幸存者的生活质量
Cancer Nurs. 2003 Dec;26(6):431-8. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200312000-00002.
9
Outcomes and quality of life following breast cancer treatment in older women: when, why, how much, and what do women want?老年女性乳腺癌治疗后的结局与生活质量:何时、为何、多少以及女性想要什么?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Sep 17;1:45. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-45.
10
Evaluation of new multimedia formats for cancer communications.癌症传播新多媒体形式的评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;5(3):e16. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.3.e16. Epub 2003 Aug 29.