Gustafson David, Wise Meg, Bhattacharya Abhik, Pulvermacher Alice, Shanovich Kathleen, Phillips Brenda, Lehman Erik, Chinchilli Vernon, Hawkins Robert, Kim Jee-Seon
Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jul 26;14(4):e101. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1964.
Asthma is the most common pediatric illness in the United States, burdening low-income and minority families disproportionately and contributing to high health care costs. Clinic-based asthma education and telephone case management have had mixed results on asthma control, as have eHealth programs and online games.
To test the effects of (1) CHESS+CM, a system for parents and children ages 4-12 years with poorly controlled asthma, on asthma control and medication adherence, and (2) competence, self-efficacy, and social support as mediators. CHESS+CM included a fully automated eHealth component (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System [CHESS]) plus monthly nurse case management (CM) via phone. CHESS, based on self-determination theory, was designed to improve competence, social support, and intrinsic motivation of parents and children.
We identified eligible parent-child dyads from files of managed care organizations in Madison and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, sent them recruitment letters, and randomly assigned them (unblinded) to a control group of treatment as usual plus asthma information or to CHESS+CM. Asthma control was measured by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and self-reported symptom-free days. Medication adherence was a composite of pharmacy refill data and medication taking. Social support, information competence, and self-efficacy were self-assessed in questionnaires. All data were collected at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Asthma diaries kept during a 3-week run-in period before randomization provided baseline data.
Of 305 parent-child dyads enrolled, 301 were randomly assigned, 153 to the control group and 148 to CHESS+CM. Most parents were female (283/301, 94%), African American (150/301, 49.8%), and had a low income as indicated by child's Medicaid status (154/301, 51.2%); 146 (48.5%) were single and 96 of 301 (31.9%) had a high school education or less. Completion rates were 127 of 153 control group dyads (83.0%) and 132 of 148 CHESS+CM group dyads (89.2%). CHESS+CM group children had significantly better asthma control on the ACQ (d = -0.31, 95% confidence limits [CL] -0.56, -0.06, P = .011), but not as measured by symptom-free days (d = 0.18, 95% CL -0.88, 1.60, P = 1.00). The composite adherence scores did not differ significantly between groups (d = 1.48%, 95% CL -8.15, 11.11, P = .76). Social support was a significant mediator for CHESS+CM's effect on asthma control (alpha = .200, P = .01; beta = .210, P = .03). Self-efficacy was not significant (alpha = .080, P = .14; beta = .476, P = .01); neither was information competence (alpha = .079, P = .09; beta = .063, P = .64).
Integrating telephone case management with eHealth benefited pediatric asthma control, though not medication adherence. Improved methods of measuring medication adherence are needed. Social support appears to be more effective than information in improving pediatric asthma control.
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00214383; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00214383 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/68OVwqMPz).
哮喘是美国最常见的儿科疾病,对低收入和少数族裔家庭造成了不成比例的负担,并导致高昂的医疗费用。基于诊所的哮喘教育和电话病例管理在哮喘控制方面效果不一,电子健康项目和在线游戏也是如此。
测试(1)CHESS+CM(一种针对4-12岁哮喘控制不佳的父母和儿童的系统)对哮喘控制和药物依从性的影响,以及(2)能力、自我效能感和社会支持作为中介因素的作用。CHESS+CM包括一个全自动电子健康组件(综合健康增强支持系统[CHESS])加上每月一次的电话护士病例管理(CM)。CHESS基于自我决定理论,旨在提高父母和儿童的能力、社会支持和内在动力。
我们从美国威斯康星州麦迪逊和密尔沃基的管理式医疗组织档案中识别出符合条件的亲子对,给他们发送招募信,并将他们(非盲法)随机分配到常规治疗加哮喘信息的对照组或CHESS+CM组。通过哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)和自我报告的无症状天数来衡量哮喘控制情况。药物依从性是药房再填充数据和服药情况的综合指标。通过问卷对社会支持、信息能力和自我效能感进行自我评估。所有数据在0、3、6、9和12个月时收集。随机分组前3周的磨合期内记录的哮喘日记提供了基线数据。
在305对参与的亲子对中,301对被随机分配,153对分配到对照组,148对分配到CHESS+CM组。大多数父母为女性(283/301,94%),非裔美国人(150/301,49.8%),且根据儿童医疗补助状态显示收入较低(154/301,51.2%);146对(48.5%)为单身,301对中的96对(31.9%)接受过高中及以下教育。对照组153对中有127对(83.0%)完成,CHESS+CM组148对中有132对(89.2%)完成。CHESS+CM组儿童在ACQ上的哮喘控制明显更好(d=-0.31,95%置信区间[CL]-0.56,-0.06,P=.011),但以无症状天数衡量则不然(d=0.18,95%CL-0.88,1.60,P=1.00)。两组的综合依从性得分无显著差异(d=1.48%,95%CL-8.15,11.11,P=.76)。社会支持是CHESS+CM对哮喘控制效果的显著中介因素(α=.200,P=.01;β=.210,P=.03)。自我效能感不显著(α=.080,P=.14;β=.476,P=.01);信息能力也不显著(α=.079,P=.09;β=.063,P=.64)。
将电话病例管理与电子健康相结合有利于儿童哮喘控制,但对药物依从性无影响。需要改进测量药物依从性的方法。在改善儿童哮喘控制方面,社会支持似乎比信息更有效。
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00214383;http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00214383(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/68OVwqMPz)