• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating health information technology in community-based settings: lessons learned.评估社区环境中的健康信息技术:经验教训。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):749-53. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000249. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
2
Engaging Vulnerable Populations in Community-based Participatory Research: Lessons Learned.参与社区参与式研究的弱势群体:经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2022;16(2):227-234. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2022.0026.
3
Establishing an implementation network: lessons learned from community-based participatory research.建立实施网络:社区参与式研究的经验教训。
Implement Sci. 2009 Mar 31;4:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-17.
4
Major lessons learned from a nationally-based community-academic partnership: addressing sibling adjustment to childhood cancer.
Fam Syst Health. 2015 Mar;33(1):61-7. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000084. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
5
Incorporating community-based participatory research principles into environmental health research: challenges and lessons learned from a housing pilot study.将基于社区的参与性研究原则纳入环境卫生研究:住房试点研究的挑战与经验教训
J Environ Health. 2014 Jun;76(10):8-17.
6
Process evaluation of an academic-community-government partnership to reduce liver diseases attributable to hepatitis B virus.学术-社区-政府合作减少乙型肝炎病毒相关肝病的过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 26;22(1):707. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08062-7.
7
Voices of Community Partners: Perspectives Gained from Conversations of Community-Based Participatory Research Experiences.社区合作伙伴的声音:从基于社区的参与式研究经验的对话中获得的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 21;17(14):5245. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145245.
8
Community Partner Perspectives on Benefits, Challenges, Facilitating Factors, and Lessons Learned from Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships in Detroit.社区合作伙伴对底特律基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系的益处、挑战、促进因素及经验教训的看法
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):299-311. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0031.
9
A Community-Engaged Approach to Environmental Health Research: Process and Lessons Learned.社区参与式环境健康研究方法:过程与经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021;15(4):533-540. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2021.0043.
10
Lessons learned in using community-based participatory research to build a national diabetes collaborative in Canada.在加拿大利用基于社区的参与性研究建立全国糖尿病协作组织过程中获得的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Winter;5(4):405-15.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Care Worker Usage of Large-Scale Health Information Exchanges in Japan: User-Level Audit Log Analysis Study.日本卫生保健工作者对大型卫生信息交换的使用情况:用户级审计日志分析研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Oct 9;12:e56263. doi: 10.2196/56263.
2
Unmet information needs of clinical teams delivering care to complex patients and design strategies to address those needs.满足为复杂患者提供护理的临床团队的未满足信息需求,并制定解决这些需求的策略。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 1;27(5):690-699. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa010.
3
Health Information Exchange Use (1990-2015): A Systematic Review.健康信息交换的使用情况(1990 - 2015年):一项系统综述。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Dec 7;5(1):27. doi: 10.5334/egems.249.
4
Outcomes From Health Information Exchange: Systematic Review and Future Research Needs.健康信息交换的结果:系统评价和未来研究需求。
JMIR Med Inform. 2015 Dec 15;3(4):e39. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5215.
5
Feasibility and impact of implementing a private care system's diabetes quality improvement intervention in the safety net: a cluster-randomized trial.在安全网中实施私立医疗系统糖尿病质量改进干预措施的可行性与影响:一项整群随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2015 Jun 10;10:83. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0259-4.
6
Associations between healthcare quality and use of electronic health record functions in ambulatory care.门诊医疗中医疗质量与电子健康记录功能使用之间的关联。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul;22(4):864-71. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv030. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
7
How could health information exchange better meet the needs of care practitioners?健康信息交换如何能更好地满足护理从业者的需求?
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Oct 15;5(4):861-77. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-06-RA-0055. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Community-based health information technology alliances: potential predictors of early sustainability.社区健康信息技术联盟:早期可持续性的潜在预测因素。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr;17(4):290-5.
2
Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program. Final rule.医疗保险和医疗补助计划;电子健康记录激励计划。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2010 Jul 28;75(144):44313-588.
3
Electronic prescribing improves medication safety in community-based office practices.电子处方可提高社区门诊的用药安全性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jun;25(6):530-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1238-8. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
4
Evaluating healthcare information technology outside of academia: observations from the national resource center for healthcare information technology at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.评估医疗信息技术在学术界之外的应用:来自医疗保健研究与质量局国家医疗信息技术资源中心的观察。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):631-6. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3033. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
5
HEAL NY: Promoting interoperable health information technology in New York State.HEAL NY:促进纽约州医疗信息互联互通。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):493-504. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.493.
6
A tale of two large community electronic health record extension projects.两个大型社区电子健康记录扩展项目的故事。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):345-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.345.
7
Community-wide implementation of health information technology: the Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative experience.社区范围内健康信息技术的实施:马萨诸塞州电子健康协作项目的经验
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):132-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2899. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
8
A combined qualitative method for testing an interactive risk communication tool.一种用于测试交互式风险沟通工具的综合定性方法。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11;2007:16-20.
9
Measurement properties of the Inventory of Cognitive Bias in Medicine (ICBM).医学认知偏差量表(ICBM)的测量属性。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 May 28;8:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-20.
10
Electronic result viewing and quality of care in small group practices.小型医疗团队中的电子结果查看与医疗质量
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Apr;23(4):405-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0448-1.

评估社区环境中的健康信息技术:经验教训。

Evaluating health information technology in community-based settings: lessons learned.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York 10065, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):749-53. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000249. Epub 2011 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000249
PMID:21807649
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3198001/
Abstract

Implementing health information technology (IT) at the community level is a national priority to help improve healthcare quality, safety, and efficiency. However, community-based organizations implementing health IT may not have expertise in evaluation. This study describes lessons learned from experience as a multi-institutional academic collaborative established to provide independent evaluation of community-based health IT initiatives. The authors' experience derived from adapting the principles of community-based participatory research to the field of health IT. To assist other researchers, the lessons learned under four themes are presented: (A) the structure of the partnership between academic investigators and the community; (B) communication issues; (C) the relationship between implementation timing and evaluation studies; and (D) study methodology. These lessons represent practical recommendations for researchers interested in pursuing similar collaborations.

摘要

在社区层面实施健康信息技术(IT)是国家的重点工作,有助于提高医疗质量、安全性和效率。然而,实施健康 IT 的社区组织可能不具备评估方面的专业知识。本研究描述了作为一个多机构学术合作组织的经验教训,该组织旨在为社区健康 IT 计划提供独立评估。作者的经验来自于将社区参与性研究的原则应用于健康 IT 领域。为了帮助其他研究人员,根据四个主题总结了经验教训:(A)学术调查人员与社区之间的伙伴关系结构;(B)沟通问题;(C)实施时机与评估研究之间的关系;和(D)研究方法。这些经验教训为有兴趣开展类似合作的研究人员提供了实用建议。