Wessely S
Institute of Psychiatry, London.
Psychol Med. 1990 Feb;20(1):35-53. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700013210.
The history of neurasthenia is discussed in the light of current interest in chronic fatigue, and in particular the illness called myalgic encephalomyelitis ('ME'). A comparison is made of the symptoms, presumed aetiologies and treatment of both illnesses, as well as their social setting. It is shown that neurasthenia remained popular as long as it was viewed as a non-psychiatric, neurological illness caused by environmental factors which affected successful people and for which the cure was rest. The decline in neurasthenia was related to the changes which occurred in each of these views. It is argued that similar factors are associated with the current interest in myalgic encephalomyelitis. It is further argued that neither neurasthenia nor 'ME' can be fully understood within a single medical or psychiatric model. Instead both have arisen in the context of contemporary explanations and attitudes involving mental illness. Future understanding, treatment and prevention of these and related illnesses will depend upon both psychosocial and neurobiological explanations of physical and mental fatigability.
本文结合当前对慢性疲劳,尤其是肌痛性脑脊髓炎(“ME”)的关注,探讨了神经衰弱的历史。文章对这两种疾病的症状、推测病因、治疗方法及其社会背景进行了比较。结果表明,只要神经衰弱被视为一种由环境因素引起的非精神性神经疾病,且患者多为成功人士,治疗方法是休息,那么它就一直广为人知。神经衰弱的衰落与这些观点中每一个所发生的变化有关。有人认为,类似的因素与当前对肌痛性脑脊髓炎的关注有关。进一步的观点认为,无论是神经衰弱还是“ME”,都无法在单一的医学或精神病学模型中得到充分理解。相反,两者都是在涉及精神疾病的当代解释和态度的背景下出现的。对这些及相关疾病的未来理解、治疗和预防将取决于对身心疲劳的社会心理和神经生物学解释。