• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

**首届医疗保健模拟学会研究共识峰会:会议的组织和成果综合**

The first Research Consensus Summit of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare: conduction and a synthesis of the results.

机构信息

Danish Institute for Medical Simulation, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Simul Healthc. 2011 Aug;6 Suppl:S1-9. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31822238fc.

DOI:10.1097/SIH.0b013e31822238fc
PMID:21817856
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In this article, we describe the preparation and execution of the first Research Consensus Summit (Summit) of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare (SSH) held in January 2011 in New Orleans, Louisiana. The goals of the Summit were to provide guidance for better simulation-related research, to broaden the scope of topics investigated, and to highlight the importance of simulation-related research.

METHOD

An international Core Group (the authors of this article) worked with the SSH Research Committee to identify 10 topic areas relevant for future research that would be examined by the 10 Topic Groups composed of Topic Chairs and Topic Group Members. Each Topic Group prepared a monograph and slide presentation on their topic which was presented at the 2-day Summit. The audience provided feedback on each presentation. Based on this feedback, the Topic Groups revised their presentations and monographs for publication in this supplement to Simulation in Healthcare. The Core Group has synthesized an overview of the key Summit themes in this article.

RESULTS

In some groups, the agreement was that there is currently no consensus about the state of the science in certain topic aspects. Some key themes emerged from the Topic Groups. The conceptual and theoretical bases of simulation-related research, as well as the methods used and their methodological foundations, need to be more explicitly described in future publications. Although no single method is inherently better, the mix of research methods chosen should match the goal of each study. The impact of simulation, whether direct or indirect, needs to be assessed across different levels of training, and larger, more complex contexts need to be taken into account. When interpreting simulation-related research, the ecological validity of the results needs to be taken into consideration. The scope of simulation-related research can be widened from having simulation as the focus of research (research about simulation), to using simulation to investigate other research questions (research with simulation). Simulation-related research can benefit from an improved understanding of structural differences and similarities with other domains. The development of simulation equipment and concepts will benefit from applying known and available science-based design frameworks. Overall, the context of simulation-related research needs to be better understood. The progress of research depends on building overarching and sustainable research programs that relate individual studies with each other.

DISCUSSION

The Summit was successful in taking a snapshot of the state of the science. Future summits might explore these topics further, monitor progress, and address new topics.

摘要

简介

本文介绍了 2011 年 1 月在美国路易斯安那州新奥尔良市举行的首届医疗保健模拟学会(SSH)研究共识峰会(峰会)的筹备和执行情况。峰会的目标是为更好的模拟相关研究提供指导,拓宽研究课题的范围,并强调模拟相关研究的重要性。

方法

一个由国际核心小组(本文作者)与 SSH 研究委员会合作,确定了 10 个与未来研究相关的主题领域,这些领域将由由主题主席和主题小组成员组成的 10 个主题小组进行研究。每个主题小组都准备了一份关于其主题的专题论文和幻灯片演示,在为期两天的峰会上进行了介绍。观众对每个演示提供了反馈。根据这些反馈,主题小组对他们的演示和专题论文进行了修改,以发表在本《模拟医疗保健》增刊上。核心小组在本文中综合了峰会的主要主题概述。

结果

在一些小组中,大家一致认为,在某些主题方面,目前还没有关于科学现状的共识。一些关键主题从主题小组中浮现出来。模拟相关研究的概念和理论基础,以及所使用的方法及其方法论基础,需要在未来的出版物中更明确地描述。虽然没有一种方法是固有更好的,但所选的研究方法组合应与每项研究的目标相匹配。需要在不同的培训水平和更复杂的情况下评估模拟的影响,无论是直接的还是间接的。在解释模拟相关研究时,需要考虑到结果的生态有效性。模拟相关研究的范围可以从将模拟作为研究的重点(关于模拟的研究)扩大到利用模拟来研究其他研究问题(使用模拟的研究)。模拟相关研究可以从更好地了解与其他领域的结构差异和相似性中受益。模拟设备和概念的发展将受益于应用已知的和可用的基于科学的设计框架。总的来说,需要更好地了解模拟相关研究的背景。研究的进展取决于建立相互关联的、可持续的总体研究计划,使单个研究相互关联。

讨论

峰会成功地捕捉到了科学现状的快照。未来的峰会可能会进一步探讨这些主题,监测进展情况,并解决新的主题。

相似文献

1
The first Research Consensus Summit of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare: conduction and a synthesis of the results.**首届医疗保健模拟学会研究共识峰会:会议的组织和成果综合**
Simul Healthc. 2011 Aug;6 Suppl:S1-9. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31822238fc.
2
Chinese villages and their sustainable future: the European Union-China-Research Project "SUCCESS".中国乡村及其可持续未来:欧盟-中国研究项目“SUCCESS”
J Environ Manage. 2008 Apr;87(2):204-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.012. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
3
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
4
Developing interdisciplinary maternity services policy in Canada. Evaluation of a consensus workshop.在加拿大制定跨学科孕产服务政策。共识研讨会评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;16(1):238-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01326.x.
5
The study of client-provider interactions: a review of methodological issues.医患互动研究:方法学问题综述
Stud Fam Plann. 1994 Jan-Feb;25(1):1-17.
6
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
7
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
8
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
9
Millennium conference 2005 on medical simulation: a summary report.2005年医学模拟千年会议:总结报告
Simul Healthc. 2007 Summer;2(2):88-95. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318053e066.
10
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.

引用本文的文献

1
Resilience-focused debriefing: addressing complexity in interprofessional simulation-based education-a design-based research study.以复原力为重点的汇报:应对基于跨专业模拟的教育中的复杂性——一项基于设计的研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2025 Apr 29;10(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41077-025-00352-4.
2
School-based research agenda on healthcare simulation for nursing education in Hong Kong.香港护理教育中医疗模拟的校本研究议程。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021 Feb 26;7(5):435-437. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000774. eCollection 2021.
3
Using clinical simulation to study how to improve quality and safety in healthcare.
利用临床模拟研究如何提高医疗保健的质量和安全性。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Mar 4;6(2):87-94. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000370. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
4
Simulation for Operational Readiness in a New Freestanding Emergency Department: Strategy and Tactics.新建独立急诊部运营准备模拟:策略与战术。
Simul Healthc. 2016 Oct;11(5):345-356. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000180.
5
Five Topics Health Care Simulation Can Address to Improve Patient Safety: Results From a Consensus Process.医疗模拟可改善患者安全的五个主题:共识过程的结果。
J Patient Saf. 2019 Jun;15(2):111-120. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000254.
6
Translational educational research: a necessity for effective health-care improvement.转化式教育研究:改善医疗成效的必要之举。
Chest. 2012 Nov;142(5):1097-1103. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0148.