• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论无聊和社会认同:一种实用的意义调节方法。

On boredom and social identity: a pragmatic meaning-regulation approach.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Ireland.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Dec;37(12):1679-91. doi: 10.1177/0146167211418530. Epub 2011 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1177/0146167211418530
PMID:21844095
Abstract

People who feel bored experience that their current situation is meaningless and are motivated to reestablish a sense of meaningfulness. Building on the literature that conceptualizes social identification as source of meaningfulness, the authors tested the hypothesis that boredom increases the valuation of ingroups and devaluation of outgroups. Indeed, state boredom increased the liking of an ingroup name (Study 1), it increased hypothetical jail sentences given to an outgroup offender (Study 2 and Study 3), especially in comparison to an ingroup offender (Study 3), it increased positive evaluations of participants' ingroups, especially when ingroups were not the most favored ones to begin with (Study 4), and it increased the appreciation of an ingroup symbol, mediated by people's need to engage in meaningful behavior (Study 5). Several measures ruled out that these results could be explained by other affective states. These novel findings are discussed with respect to boredom, social identity, and existential psychology research.

摘要

感到无聊的人会觉得自己目前的处境毫无意义,并会努力重新建立有意义的感觉。基于将社会认同概念化为意义之源的文献,作者检验了这样一个假设:无聊会增加对群体内的评价和对群体外的贬低。事实上,状态无聊会增加对群体内名称的喜爱(研究 1),它会增加对群体外罪犯的假设监禁判决(研究 2 和研究 3),尤其是与群体内罪犯相比(研究 3),它会增加对参与者群体内的积极评价,尤其是当群体内最初不是最受欢迎的群体时(研究 4),并且它会增加对群体内符号的欣赏,这是由人们进行有意义行为的需要所介导的(研究 5)。多项措施排除了这些结果可以用其他情感状态来解释的可能性。这些新发现是根据无聊、社会认同和存在主义心理学研究来讨论的。

相似文献

1
On boredom and social identity: a pragmatic meaning-regulation approach.论无聊和社会认同:一种实用的意义调节方法。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Dec;37(12):1679-91. doi: 10.1177/0146167211418530. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
2
Can't Live With Them, Can't Live Without Them: The Ambivalent Effects of Existential Outgroup Threat on Helping Behavior.无法与他们共存,也无法没有他们:外群体生存威胁对帮助行为的矛盾影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jun;50(6):971-984. doi: 10.1177/01461672231158097. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
3
In search of meaningfulness: nostalgia as an antidote to boredom.寻找意义感:怀旧是对抗无聊的良药。
Emotion. 2013 Jun;13(3):450-61. doi: 10.1037/a0030442. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
4
Bored like Hell: Religiosity reduces boredom and tempers the quest for meaning.百无聊赖:宗教信仰减少无聊感,缓和对意义的追寻。
Emotion. 2019 Mar;19(2):255-269. doi: 10.1037/emo0000439. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
5
Why do people perceive ingroup homogeneity on ingroup traits and outgroup homogeneity on outgroup traits?为什么人们会认为内群体在群体特征上具有同质性,而外群体在群体特征上具有同质性呢?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Jan;33(1):31-42. doi: 10.1177/0146167206293190.
6
Social identity complexity and outgroup tolerance.社会身份复杂性与对外群体的宽容度。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Mar;31(3):428-37. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271710.
7
Boredom and social meaning.无聊与社会意义。
Br J Sociol. 1999 Dec;50(4):631-46.
8
Antecedents and consequences of social identity complexity: intergroup contact, distinctiveness threat, and outgroup attitudes.社会认同复杂性的前因与后果:群体间接触、独特性威胁及外群体态度。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Aug;35(8):1085-98. doi: 10.1177/0146167209337037. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
9
Striving for success in outgroup settings: effects of contextually emphasizing ingroup dimensions on stigmatized group members' social identity and performance styles.在外群体环境中追求成功:情境性强调内群体维度对受污名化群体成员社会认同和表现风格的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):576-88. doi: 10.1177/0146167205283336.
10
Social perception as induction and inference: an integrative model of intergroup differentiation, ingroup favoritism, and differential accuracy.社会知觉作为归纳和推理:群体差异化、内群体偏好和差异准确性的综合模型。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jan;100(1):66-83. doi: 10.1037/a0021051.

引用本文的文献

1
Prosociality and public support for tobacco control policies among South Korean adults: A cross-sectional study.韩国成年人的亲社会行为与对烟草控制政策的公众支持:一项横断面研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Apr 24;30:101809. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101809. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
More boring, more craving for smartphone use? The moderating role of fear of missing out.越无聊,对智能手机使用的渴望就越高?错失恐惧的调节作用。
J Behav Addict. 2025 Feb 19;14(1):405-415. doi: 10.1556/2006.2025.00009. Print 2025 Mar 28.
3
Boredom signals deviation from a cognitive homeostatic set point.
无聊表明偏离了认知稳态设定点。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Feb 10;3(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00209-6.
4
Pace of Life Is Faster for a Bored Person: Exploring the Relationship Between Trait Boredom and Fast Life History Strategy.无聊的人生活节奏更快:探索特质无聊与快速生活史策略之间的关系。
Evol Psychol. 2025 Jan-Mar;23(1):14747049241310772. doi: 10.1177/14747049241310772.
5
People are increasingly bored in our digital age.在我们这个数字时代,人们越来越感到无聊。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Nov 3;2(1):106. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00155-9.
6
Disentangling boredom from depression using the phenomenology and content of involuntary autobiographical memories.运用内隐自传记忆的现象学和内容来区分无聊和抑郁。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 24;14(1):2106. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52495-5.
7
Contemporary myths on boredom.关于无聊的当代神话。
Front Sociol. 2023 Jun 7;8:1183875. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1183875. eCollection 2023.
8
Consumed by Boredom: Food Choice Motivation and Weight Changes during the COVID-19 Pandemic.受无聊驱使:新冠疫情期间的食物选择动机与体重变化
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Sep 28;12(10):366. doi: 10.3390/bs12100366.
9
The Struggle to Entertain Yourself: Consequences of the Internal Stimulation Factor of Boredom Proneness during Pandemic Lockdown.自我娱乐的挣扎:疫情封锁期间无聊倾向的内部刺激因素的后果。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;12(9):303. doi: 10.3390/bs12090303.
10
Sound and Silence: The Effects of Environmental Conditions on State Boredom in an Online Study during the COVID-19 Pandemic.声音与寂静:新冠疫情期间一项在线研究中环境条件对无聊状态的影响
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Aug 12;12(8):282. doi: 10.3390/bs12080282.