Suppr超能文献

以物易物:烟草公司与黑人媒体。

Quid pro quo: tobacco companies and the black press.

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2012 Apr;102(4):739-50. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300180. Epub 2011 Nov 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We explored the relationship between tobacco companies and the Black press, which plays an important role in conveying information and opinions to Black communities.

METHODS

In this archival case study, we analyzed data from internal tobacco industry documents and archives of the National Newspaper Publishers Association (NNPA), the trade association of the Black press.

RESULTS

In exchange for advertising dollars and other support, the tobacco industry expected and received support from Black newspapers for tobacco industry policy positions. Beginning in the 1990s, resistance from within the Black community and reduced advertising budgets created counterpressures. The tobacco industry, however, continued to sustain NNPA support.

CONCLUSIONS

The quid pro quo between tobacco companies and the Black press violated journalistic standards and represented an unequal trade. Although numerous factors explain today's tobacco-related health disparities, the Black press's service to tobacco companies is problematic because of the trust that the community placed in such media. Understanding the relationship between the tobacco industry and the NNPA provides insight into strategies that the tobacco industry may use in other communities and countries.

摘要

目的

我们探讨了烟草公司与黑人媒体之间的关系,后者在向黑人社区传递信息和观点方面发挥着重要作用。

方法

在这项档案案例研究中,我们分析了来自烟草行业内部文件和全国报纸出版商协会(NNPA)档案的数据,NNPA 是黑人媒体的行业协会。

结果

为了换取广告收入和其他支持,烟草行业期望并得到黑人报纸对烟草行业政策立场的支持。从 20 世纪 90 年代开始,黑人社区内部的抵制和广告预算的减少带来了反压力。然而,烟草行业继续维持对 NNPA 的支持。

结论

烟草公司与黑人媒体之间的交换违反了新闻标准,代表了不平等的交易。尽管有许多因素可以解释今天与烟草相关的健康差距,但黑人媒体为烟草公司服务是有问题的,因为社区对这些媒体的信任。了解烟草行业与 NNPA 之间的关系,可以深入了解烟草行业可能在其他社区和国家使用的策略。

相似文献

1
Quid pro quo: tobacco companies and the black press.以物易物:烟草公司与黑人媒体。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Apr;102(4):739-50. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300180. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
5
Smoking in Ghana: a review of tobacco industry activity.加纳的吸烟状况:烟草业活动综述。
Tob Control. 2009 Jun;18(3):206-11. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030601. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
10
The cigarette controversy.香烟争议
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Jun;16(6):1070-6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0912.

引用本文的文献

4
Targeted tobacco marketing in 2020: the case of #BlackLivesMatter.2020年的定向烟草营销:以#黑人的命也是命#运动为例。
Tob Control. 2023 Jul;32(4):530-533. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056838. Epub 2021 Dec 14.

本文引用的文献

3
The role of corporate credibility in legitimizing disease promotion.企业信誉在使疾病推广合法化方面的作用。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Mar;99(3):452-61. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.138115. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
7
Addressing tobacco-related health disparities.应对与烟草相关的健康差异。
Addiction. 2007 Oct;102 Suppl 2:30-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01953.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验