Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Science and McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023065. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
Generic triage risk assessments are widely used in the emergency department (ED), but have not been validated for prediction of short-term risk among patients with acute heart failure (HF). Our objective was to evaluate the Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) for prediction of early death among HF patients.
We included patients presenting with HF to an ED in Ontario from Apr 2003 to Mar 2007. We used the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System and vital statistics databases to examine care and outcomes.
Among 68,380 patients (76±12 years, 49.4% men), early mortality was stratified with death rates of 9.9%, 1.9%, 0.9%, and 0.5% at 1-day, and 17.2%, 5.9%, 3.8%, and 2.5% at 7-days, for CTAS 1, 2, 3, and 4-5, respectively. Compared to lower acuity (CTAS 4-5) patients, adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for 1-day death were 1.32 (95%CI; 0.93-1.88; p = 0.12) for CTAS 3, 2.41 (95%CI; 1.71-3.40; p<0.001) for CTAS 2, and highest for CTAS 1: 9.06 (95%CI; 6.28-13.06; p<0.001). Predictors of triage-critical (CTAS 1) status included oxygen saturation <90% (aOR 5.92, 95%CI; 3.09-11.81; p<0.001), respiratory rate >24 breaths/minute (aOR 1.96, 95%CI; 1.05-3.67; p = 0.034), and arrival by paramedic (aOR 3.52, 95%CI; 1.70-8.02; p = 0.001). While age/sex-adjusted CTAS score provided good discrimination for ED (c-statistic = 0.817) and 1-day (c-statistic = 0.724) death, mortality prediction was improved further after accounting for cardiac and non-cardiac co-morbidities (c-statistics 0.882 and 0.810, respectively; both p<0.001).
A semi-quantitative triage acuity scale assigned at ED presentation and based largely on respiratory factors predicted emergent death among HF patients.
通用分诊风险评估被广泛应用于急诊部(ED),但尚未对急性心力衰竭(HF)患者的短期风险预测进行验证。我们的目的是评估加拿大分诊 acuity 量表(CTAS)在预测 HF 患者的早期死亡中的作用。
我们纳入了 2003 年 4 月至 2007 年 3 月在安大略省 ED 就诊的 HF 患者。我们使用国家门诊护理报告系统和生命统计数据库来检查护理和结局。
在 68380 名患者(76±12 岁,49.4%为男性)中,早期死亡率分层为 CTAS 1、2、3 和 4-5 组的 1 天死亡率分别为 9.9%、1.9%、0.9%和 0.5%,7 天死亡率分别为 17.2%、5.9%、3.8%和 2.5%。与较低 acuity(CTAS 4-5)患者相比,1 天死亡的校正优势比(aOR)分别为 CTAS 3(95%CI:0.93-1.88;p=0.12)、CTAS 2(95%CI:1.71-3.40;p<0.001)和 CTAS 1(95%CI:6.28-13.06;p<0.001)。分诊危急(CTAS 1)状态的预测因素包括血氧饱和度<90%(aOR 5.92,95%CI:3.09-11.81;p<0.001)、呼吸频率>24 次/分钟(aOR 1.96,95%CI:1.05-3.67;p=0.034)和由护理人员送达(aOR 3.52,95%CI:1.70-8.02;p=0.001)。虽然年龄/性别调整后的 CTAS 评分对 ED(c 统计量=0.817)和 1 天(c 统计量=0.724)死亡率具有良好的区分度,但在考虑心脏和非心脏合并症后,死亡率预测进一步提高(c 统计量分别为 0.882 和 0.810,均为 p<0.001)。
ED 就诊时分配的半定量分诊 acuity 量表主要基于呼吸因素预测 HF 患者的紧急死亡。