• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“眼神读心测试”在土耳其人群中的可靠性调查。

Investigation of the reliability of the "reading the mind in the eyes test" in a Turkish population.

作者信息

Yıldırım Ejder Akgün, Kaşar Muzaffer, Güdük Mehmet, Ateş Elif, Küçükparlak Ilker, Ozalmete Erdem Onur

机构信息

Bakirkoy Research and Training Hospital for Psychiatry.

出版信息

Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2011 Fall;22(3):177-86.

PMID:21870307
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test"(RMET) is one of the most widely used tasks for examining the Theory of Mind. In this study, the goal was to determine the reliability of a Turkish version of the RMET and the distribution of the results in a healthy population.

METHOD

The original test is made up of 36 pictures of solely the eye region of different individuals. Subjects are asked to choose the option that best describes the mental state of individual in the picture. After 3 piloting studies each conducted with different sets of 8 people, 2 items (25 and 35) in which most of the subjects consistently replied to foil words, were excluded in final step. 117 healthy volunteers were given the test, and 70 of these individuals were re-tested two weeks later. The Bland and Altman method was used to examine test re-test reliability

RESULTS

The mean value of the number of correct responses was 24.46 (SD=3.44) for the test and 24.13 (SD=4.36) for the re-test. No significant difference was shown between test and re-test results (p=0.815). After excluding items 19 and 21 which failed to show reliability, the mean correct response rates were 23.64 (SD=3.38) and 23.40 (SD=4.32), respectively. The educational level significantly affected the correct response rates.

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of the RMET was found to be reliable in a healthy population. The educational level should be taken into account. The 32-item version of the Turkish RMET can be used to evaluate the social, cognitive and emotional processes in adults.

摘要

目的

“眼睛解读心智测试”(RMET)是用于检验心智理论的最广泛使用的任务之一。在本研究中,目标是确定RMET土耳其语版本的可靠性以及健康人群中的结果分布。

方法

原始测试由36张仅不同个体眼部区域的图片组成。要求受试者选择最能描述图片中个体心理状态的选项。在分别对不同的8人组进行3次预试验研究后,在最后一步中排除了大多数受试者一致回答错误选项的2个项目(项目25和35)。对117名健康志愿者进行了测试,其中70人在两周后重新进行了测试。采用布兰德和奥特曼方法检验测试 - 重测可靠性。

结果

测试的正确回答数量的平均值为24.46(标准差 = 3.44),重测的正确回答数量的平均值为24.13(标准差 = 4.36)。测试和重测结果之间未显示出显著差异(p = 0.815)。在排除未能显示出可靠性的项目19和21后,平均正确回答率分别为23.64(标准差 = 3.38)和23.40(标准差 = 4.32)。教育水平显著影响正确回答率。

结论

发现RMET土耳其语版本在健康人群中是可靠的。应考虑教育水平。土耳其RMET的32项版本可用于评估成年人的社会、认知和情感过程。

相似文献

1
Investigation of the reliability of the "reading the mind in the eyes test" in a Turkish population.“眼神读心测试”在土耳其人群中的可靠性调查。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2011 Fall;22(3):177-86.
2
Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain.针对腰痛患者的魁北克腰痛残疾量表土耳其语版本的验证
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 15;34(6):E219-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181971e2d.
3
Affective temperaments in clinically-well subjects in Turkey: initial psychometric data on the TEMPS-A.土耳其临床健康受试者的情感气质:TEMPS-A的初步心理测量数据。
J Affect Disord. 2005 Mar;85(1-2):113-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2003.10.011.
4
The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease and normal subjects.阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表(ADAS-Cog)土耳其语版本在轻度和中度阿尔茨海默病患者及正常受试者中的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;21(3):259-65. doi: 10.1002/gps.1457.
5
I can see what you feel, but I can't deal with it: Impaired theory of mind in depression.我能理解你的感受,但我无法应对:抑郁症患者的心理理论受损。
J Affect Disord. 2011 Jul;132(1-2):104-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.02.010. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
6
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the ECOS 16 questionnaire in postmenopausal osteoporosis.绝经后骨质疏松症 ECOS 16 问卷土耳其语版本的信度和效度。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 Dec;45(4):521-6. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
7
The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: test-retest reliability of a Swedish version.“眼神读心术”测试:瑞典语版本的重测信度
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2009 Mar;14(2):127-43. doi: 10.1080/13546800902901518.
8
Validation of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test in a healthy Spanish sample and women with anorexia nervosa.在健康西班牙样本及神经性厌食症女性中对“读心术”眼测试的验证。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2018 Jul;23(4):201-217. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2018.1461618. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
9
Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication.阅读一段文学小说真的能提高心理理论吗?一项复制尝试。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):e46-e54. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000064. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
10
Revised dental beliefs survey: reliability and validity of a 22-item modified Turkish version.修订后的牙科信念调查:22 项土耳其语修订版的信度和效度。
J Oral Rehabil. 2009 Nov;36(11):831-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02001.x. Epub 2009 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship Between Illness Duration and Social Cognitive Abilities in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder.精神分裂症谱系障碍中病程与社会认知能力的关系
Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Apr 18;35(3):208-215. doi: 10.5152/pcp.2025.241037.
2
Exploring Social Cognition Sub-Domains and Predictors in Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.探索多发性硬化症中的社会认知子领域及预测因素:一项横断面研究
Brain Behav. 2025 Jul;15(7):e70691. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70691.
3
Is Schizophrenia a Scapegoat? the Role of Childhood Traumas and Theory of Mind on Crime.
精神分裂症是替罪羊吗?童年创伤和心理理论在犯罪中的作用。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2025 Aug;35(4):187-196. doi: 10.1002/cbm.70002. Epub 2025 Jul 19.
4
The Association Between Theory of Mind, Psychopathic Traits, Borderline Personality Traits, and Severity of Substance Use Disorder in Women: A Comparative Analysis.女性心理理论、精神病态特质、边缘型人格特质与物质使用障碍严重程度之间的关联:一项比较分析。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 24;26(3):44175. doi: 10.31083/AP44175. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Disability and social cognition in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍心境正常患者的残疾与社会认知
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07119-1.
6
Investigation of the relationship between cognitive flexibility, theory of mind and creative thinking in patients with bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍患者认知灵活性、心理理论与创造性思维之间关系的研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 6;25(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06908-y.
7
Tinnitus: Does it Lead to Impairments in Metacognitive Functions and the Theory of Mind Skills?耳鸣:它会导致元认知功能和心理理论技能受损吗?
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Mar 28;62(4):131-137. doi: 10.4274/tao.2024.2024-8-4.
8
The role of metacognition and social cognition in childhood trauma effecting on prognosis: 1-year follow-up study in patients with first-episode schizophrenia.元认知和社会认知在童年创伤影响预后中的作用:首发精神分裂症患者的1年随访研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 19;25(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06686-7.
9
Decision Making, Emotion Recognition and Childhood Traumatic Experiences in Murder Convicts Imprisoned with Aggravated Life Sentence: A Prison Study.被判处加重无期徒刑的谋杀罪犯的决策、情绪识别与童年创伤经历:一项监狱研究
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2025 Feb 20;62(1):20-26. doi: 10.29399/npa.28778. eCollection 2025.
10
Drug Holidays May Attenuate Beneficial Effects of Treatment on Emotion Regulation and Recognition Among Children with ADHD: A Single-Center, Prospective Study.药物假期可能会削弱治疗对多动症儿童情绪调节和识别能力的有益影响:一项单中心前瞻性研究。
Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Nov 28;34(4):285-293. doi: 10.5152/pcp.2024.24862.