Department of Neurological and Behavioral Sciences, University of Siena, Italy.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Sep;33(9):2062-71. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21344. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
MR-based measurements of brain volumes may be affected by the presence of white matter (WM) lesions. Here, we assessed how and to what extent this may happen for WM lesions of various sizes and intensities. After inserting WM lesions of different sizes and intensities into T1-W brain images of healthy subjects, we assessed the effect on two widely used automatic methods for brain volume measurement such as SIENAX (segmentation-based) and SIENA (registration-based). To explore the relevance of partial volume (PV) estimation, we performed the experiments with two different PV models, implemented by the same segmentation algorithm (FAST) of SIENAX and SIENA. Finally, we tested potential solutions to this issue. The presence of WM lesions did not bias measurements for registration-based method such as SIENA. By contrast, the presence of WM lesions affected segmentation-based brain volume measurements such as SIENAx. The misclassification of both gray matter (GM) and WM volumes varied considerably with lesion size and intensity, especially when the lesion intensity was similar to that of the GM/WM interface. The extent to which the presence of WM lesions could affect tissue-class measures was clearly driven by the PV modeling used, with the mixel-type PV model giving a lower error in the presence of WM lesions. The tissue misclassification due to WM lesions was still present when they were masked out. By contrast, refilling the lesions with intensities matching the surrounding normal-appearing WM ensured accurate tissue-class measurements and thus represents a promising approach for accurate tissue classification and brain volume measurements.
基于磁共振(MR)的脑容量测量可能会受到脑白质(WM)病变的影响。在这里,我们评估了不同大小和强度的 WM 病变会以何种方式以及在何种程度上产生这种影响。我们将不同大小和强度的 WM 病变插入健康受试者的 T1-W 脑图像中,然后评估这对两种广泛使用的脑容量自动测量方法(基于分割的 SIENAX 和基于配准的 SIENA)的影响。为了探究部分容积(PV)估计的相关性,我们使用两种不同的 PV 模型进行了实验,这两种模型由 SIENAX 和 SIENA 相同的分割算法(FAST)实现。最后,我们测试了这个问题的潜在解决方案。WM 病变的存在不会对基于配准的方法(如 SIENA)的测量产生偏差。相比之下,WM 病变的存在会影响基于分割的脑容量测量,如 SIENAx。WM 病变会严重影响 GM 和 WM 体积的分类错误,尤其是当病变强度与 GM/WM 界面的强度相似时。WM 病变对组织分类指标的影响程度显然取决于所使用的 PV 模型,其中混合 PV 模型在存在 WM 病变时的误差更小。即使将 WM 病变掩蔽,组织分类错误仍然存在。相比之下,用与周围正常 WM 匹配的强度填充病变可以确保准确的组织分类,因此是一种用于准确组织分类和脑容量测量的有前途的方法。