• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How does the brain regulate negative bias to stigma?大脑如何调节对污名的负面偏见?
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Aug;7(6):715-26. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr046. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
2
Examining the effects of emotion regulation on the ERP response to highly negative social stigmas.研究情绪调节对事件相关电位(ERP)对高度负面社会污名反应的影响。
Soc Neurosci. 2017 Jun;12(3):349-360. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1166155. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
3
An fMRI investigation of the effects of culture on evaluations of stigmatized individuals.一项关于文化对污名化个体评价影响的 fMRI 研究。
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):336-349. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.030. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
4
Does context matter in evaluations of stigmatized individuals? An fMRI study.在对受污名化个体的评估中,情境是否重要?一项 fMRI 研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Jun;8(5):602-8. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss037. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
5
Transient and sustained BOLD signal time courses affect the detection of emotion-related brain activation in fMRI.瞬态和持续的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号时间进程会影响功能磁共振成像(fMRI)中与情绪相关的脑激活检测。
Neuroimage. 2014 Dec;103:522-532. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.054. Epub 2014 Sep 7.
6
Exploring the neural correlates of social stereotyping.探索社会刻板印象的神经关联。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1560-70. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21091.
7
Neural correlates of experienced moral emotion: an fMRI investigation of emotion in response to prejudice feedback.体验道德情感的神经相关物:对偏见反馈的情绪的 fMRI 研究。
Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(2):203-18. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2013.878750. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
8
Neural bases of motivated reasoning: an FMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election.动机性推理的神经基础:一项关于2004年美国总统选举中情感因素对党派政治判断影响的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Nov;18(11):1947-58. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1947.
9
Aging minds and twisting attitudes: an fMRI investigation of age differences in inhibiting prejudice.衰老的大脑与扭曲的态度:一项关于抑制偏见中年龄差异的功能磁共振成像研究
Psychol Aging. 2009 Sep;24(3):530-41. doi: 10.1037/a0016065.
10
The blame game: the effect of responsibility and social stigma on empathy for pain.指责游戏:责任和社会耻辱感对疼痛共情的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 May;22(5):985-97. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21266.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of a Narrative-Based Online Course Aimed at Reducing Stigma Toward Transgender Children and Adolescents: Longitudinal Observational Study.旨在减少对跨性别儿童和青少年污名化的叙事型在线课程的效果:纵向观察研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 9;9:e59605. doi: 10.2196/59605.
2
Exploring the impact of immersive virtual reality on depression knowledge and stigma reduction: a cross-over RCT fMRI study.探索沉浸式虚拟现实对抑郁症知识及减少污名化的影响:一项交叉随机对照试验功能磁共振成像研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 2;14(1):5193. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55797-w.
3
Comparisons Between COVID-19 Stigma and Other Stigmas: Distinct in Explicit Attitudes and Similar in Implicit Process.2019冠状病毒病污名与其他污名的比较:显性态度有别,隐性过程相似
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 26;13:848993. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848993. eCollection 2022.
4
Leveraging Neuroscience to Fight Stigma Around Mental Health.利用神经科学对抗心理健康方面的污名化。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Feb 28;15:812184. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.812184. eCollection 2021.
5
The neuroscience of intergroup threat and violence.群体间威胁与暴力的神经科学
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Dec;131:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.025. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
6
The Neurobehavioral Mechanisms Underlying Attitudes Toward People With Mental or Physical Illness.对患有精神或身体疾病者态度背后的神经行为机制。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Nov 12;14:571225. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.571225. eCollection 2020.
7
Culture Impacts the Neural Response to Perceiving Outgroups Among Black and White Faces.文化影响对黑人和白人面孔中外群体认知的神经反应。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 May 1;13:143. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00143. eCollection 2019.
8
Neural response to evaluating depression predicts perceivers' mental health treatment recommendations.对评估抑郁症的神经反应可预测感知者的心理健康治疗建议。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Dec;17(6):1084-1097. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0534-8.
9
A randomised cross-over study assessing the "blue pyjama syndrome" in major depressive episode.一项评估重性抑郁发作中“蓝色睡衣综合征”的随机交叉研究。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 1;7(1):2629. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02411-x.
10
Age and executive ability impact the neural correlates of race perception.年龄和执行能力会影响种族认知的神经关联。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Nov;11(11):1752-1761. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw081. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.抽象和具体概念的神经表示:神经影像学研究的元分析。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Oct;31(10):1459-68. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20950.
2
Aging minds and twisting attitudes: an fMRI investigation of age differences in inhibiting prejudice.衰老的大脑与扭曲的态度:一项关于抑制偏见中年龄差异的功能磁共振成像研究
Psychol Aging. 2009 Sep;24(3):530-41. doi: 10.1037/a0016065.
3
Understanding the role of executive control in the implicit association test: why flexible people have small IAT effects.理解执行控制在内隐联想测验中的作用:为何灵活的人内隐联想测验效应较小。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Mar;63(3):595-619. doi: 10.1080/17470210903076826.
4
Alternative mechanisms for regulating racial responses according to internal vs external cues.根据内部和外部线索调节种族反应的替代机制。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2006 Jun;1(1):26-36. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsl002.
5
The good, the bad, and the ugly: an fMRI investigation of the functional anatomic correlates of stigma.善、恶与丑:一项关于污名化功能解剖学关联的功能磁共振成像研究
Soc Neurosci. 2006;1(1):5-15. doi: 10.1080/17470910600670579.
6
Individual differences in the regulation of intergroup bias: the role of conflict monitoring and neural signals for control.群体间偏见调节中的个体差异:冲突监测和控制的神经信号的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jan;94(1):60-74. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.60.
7
Neural correlates of automatic beliefs about gender and race.关于性别和种族的自动信念的神经关联。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Oct;28(10):915-30. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20320.
8
Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups.将最底层的人非人化:对极端外群体的神经影像学反应。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Oct;17(10):847-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01793.x.
9
Stereotype activation and control of race bias: cognitive control of inhibition and its impairment by alcohol.刻板印象激活与种族偏见的控制:酒精对抑制的认知控制及其损害
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Feb;90(2):272-87. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.272.
10
Integrating automatic and controlled processes into neurocognitive models of social cognition.将自动和受控过程整合到社会认知的神经认知模型中。
Brain Res. 2006 Mar 24;1079(1):86-97. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.005. Epub 2006 Feb 20.

大脑如何调节对污名的负面偏见?

How does the brain regulate negative bias to stigma?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Tufts University, 490 Boston Avenue, Tufts University Medford, MA 02155, USA.

出版信息

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Aug;7(6):715-26. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr046. Epub 2011 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1093/scan/nsr046
PMID:21896496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3427867/
Abstract

The current study uses functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine whether regulating negative bias to stigmatized individuals has a unique neural activity profile from general emotion regulation. Participants were presented with images of stigmatized (e.g. homeless people) or non-stigmatized (e.g. a man holding a gun) social targets while undergoing fMRI and were asked either to maintain or regulate their emotional response. Their implicit bias toward these stigmatized group members was also measured. Analyses were conducted in both, an event-related fashion, considering the event to be the onset of regulation, and in a blocked-design fashion, considering the sustained activity throughout the 8-s regulatory period. In the event-related (onset) analyses, participants showed more activity throughout the prefrontal cortex when initiating a regulatory response to stigmatized as compared with non-stigmatized images. This neural activity was positively correlated with their implicit bias. Interestingly, in the block (sustained) analyses, general emotion regulation elicited a more widespread pattern of neural activity as compared with stigma regulation. This activity was largely posterior, suggesting that general emotion regulation may engage more visuo-spatial processing as compared with stigma regulation. These findings suggest that regulating negative affect toward stigmatized targets may occur relatively more quickly than regulating negative affect toward non-stigmatized targets.

摘要

本研究采用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)技术,考察了调节对被污名化个体的消极偏见是否与一般情绪调节具有独特的神经活动模式。参与者在接受 fMRI 扫描时会看到被污名化(如无家可归者)或非污名化(如持枪男子)的社会目标图像,并被要求维持或调节自己的情绪反应。他们对这些污名化群体成员的内隐偏见也会被测量。分析采用事件相关和块设计两种方式进行。在事件相关(起始)分析中,当参与者开始对污名化图像做出反应时,其前额叶皮层的活动更为活跃,而当对非污名化图像做出反应时,其前额叶皮层的活动则相对较少。这种神经活动与他们的内隐偏见呈正相关。有趣的是,在块(持续)分析中,与调节污名化目标相比,一般情绪调节会引发更为广泛的神经活动模式。这种活动主要位于后部,表明与调节污名化相比,一般情绪调节可能涉及更多的视觉空间处理。这些发现表明,调节对污名化目标的消极情绪可能比调节对非污名化目标的消极情绪更快。