Suppr超能文献

大脑如何调节对污名的负面偏见?

How does the brain regulate negative bias to stigma?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Tufts University, 490 Boston Avenue, Tufts University Medford, MA 02155, USA.

出版信息

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Aug;7(6):715-26. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr046. Epub 2011 Sep 5.

Abstract

The current study uses functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine whether regulating negative bias to stigmatized individuals has a unique neural activity profile from general emotion regulation. Participants were presented with images of stigmatized (e.g. homeless people) or non-stigmatized (e.g. a man holding a gun) social targets while undergoing fMRI and were asked either to maintain or regulate their emotional response. Their implicit bias toward these stigmatized group members was also measured. Analyses were conducted in both, an event-related fashion, considering the event to be the onset of regulation, and in a blocked-design fashion, considering the sustained activity throughout the 8-s regulatory period. In the event-related (onset) analyses, participants showed more activity throughout the prefrontal cortex when initiating a regulatory response to stigmatized as compared with non-stigmatized images. This neural activity was positively correlated with their implicit bias. Interestingly, in the block (sustained) analyses, general emotion regulation elicited a more widespread pattern of neural activity as compared with stigma regulation. This activity was largely posterior, suggesting that general emotion regulation may engage more visuo-spatial processing as compared with stigma regulation. These findings suggest that regulating negative affect toward stigmatized targets may occur relatively more quickly than regulating negative affect toward non-stigmatized targets.

摘要

本研究采用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)技术,考察了调节对被污名化个体的消极偏见是否与一般情绪调节具有独特的神经活动模式。参与者在接受 fMRI 扫描时会看到被污名化(如无家可归者)或非污名化(如持枪男子)的社会目标图像,并被要求维持或调节自己的情绪反应。他们对这些污名化群体成员的内隐偏见也会被测量。分析采用事件相关和块设计两种方式进行。在事件相关(起始)分析中,当参与者开始对污名化图像做出反应时,其前额叶皮层的活动更为活跃,而当对非污名化图像做出反应时,其前额叶皮层的活动则相对较少。这种神经活动与他们的内隐偏见呈正相关。有趣的是,在块(持续)分析中,与调节污名化目标相比,一般情绪调节会引发更为广泛的神经活动模式。这种活动主要位于后部,表明与调节污名化相比,一般情绪调节可能涉及更多的视觉空间处理。这些发现表明,调节对污名化目标的消极情绪可能比调节对非污名化目标的消极情绪更快。

相似文献

1
How does the brain regulate negative bias to stigma?大脑如何调节对污名的负面偏见?
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Aug;7(6):715-26. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr046. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
6
Exploring the neural correlates of social stereotyping.探索社会刻板印象的神经关联。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1560-70. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21091.

引用本文的文献

4
Leveraging Neuroscience to Fight Stigma Around Mental Health.利用神经科学对抗心理健康方面的污名化。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Feb 28;15:812184. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.812184. eCollection 2021.
5
The neuroscience of intergroup threat and violence.群体间威胁与暴力的神经科学
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Dec;131:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.025. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
10
Age and executive ability impact the neural correlates of race perception.年龄和执行能力会影响种族认知的神经关联。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Nov;11(11):1752-1761. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw081. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验