Department of Training and Exercise Science, Faculty of Sports Science, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Jan;26(1):53-62. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318220b4ff.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and repeated-sprint training (RST) on aerobic fitness, tennis-specific endurance, linear and repeated-sprint ability (RSA), and jumping ability. Thirty-one competitive male tennis players took part in a training intervention of 6 weeks. The players were matched into 3 groups, HIIT (n = 11), RST (n = 12), or control group (CON, n = 9). The results showed significant time × intervention interactions for VO(2)peak, with a significant increase in the VO(2)peak level of 6.0% in HIIT (p = 0.008) and 4.9% in RST (p = 0.010), whereas no changes occurred in CON. However, the following differences were found between the intervention groups: The HIIT-induced greater improvements in tennis-specific endurance (HIIT 28.9% vs. RST 14.5%; p < 0.05) and RST led to a significant improvement in RSA (i.e., reduction in the mean sprint time of 3.8%; p < 0.05). Neither training strategy induced any effects on jumping and sprinting abilities. Both training interventions showed similar improvements in general aerobic fitness. Also, the present results suggest that RST represents a time-efficient stimulus for a simultaneous improvement of general and tennis-specific aerobic fitness as well for RSA.
本研究旨在比较高强度间歇训练（HIIT）和重复冲刺训练（RST）对有氧适能、网球专项耐力、直线和重复冲刺能力（RSA）以及跳跃能力的影响。31 名有竞争力的男性网球运动员参加了为期 6 周的训练干预。运动员被分为 3 组，HIIT 组（n = 11）、RST 组（n = 12）或对照组（CON，n = 9）。结果显示，VO2peak 存在显著的时间×干预交互作用，HIIT 组 VO2peak 水平显著提高 6.0%（p = 0.008），RST 组提高 4.9%（p = 0.010），而 CON 组无变化。然而，干预组之间存在以下差异：HIIT 引起的网球专项耐力显著提高（HIIT 28.9% vs. RST 14.5%；p < 0.05），而 RST 导致 RSA 显著改善（即平均冲刺时间缩短 3.8%；p < 0.05）。两种训练策略都没有对跳跃和冲刺能力产生任何影响。两种训练干预都显示出对一般有氧适能的相似改善。此外，本研究结果表明，RST 是一种高效的刺激方式，可同时提高一般和网球专项有氧适能以及 RSA。
