• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区获得性肺炎患者住院决策:急诊科医生之间的差异。

Hospital admission decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: variability among physicians in an emergency department.

机构信息

Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Division at Intermountain Medical Center and the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;59(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.032. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.032
PMID:21907451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3811925/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We examine variability among emergency physicians in rate of hospitalization for patients with pneumonia and the effect of variability on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We studied 2,069 LDS Hospital emergency department (ED) patients with community-acquired pneumonia who were aged 18 years or older during 1996 to 2006, identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision coding and compatible chest radiographs. We extracted vital signs, laboratory and radiographic results, hospitalization, and outcomes from the electronic medical record. We defined "low severity" as PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio greater than or equal to 280 mm Hg, predicted mortality less than 5% by an electronic version of CURB-65 that uses continuous and weighted elements (eCURB), and less than 3 Infectious Disease Society of America-American Thoracic Society 2007 severe pneumonia minor criteria. We adjusted hospitalization decisions and outcomes for illness severity and patient demographics.

RESULTS

Initial hospitalization rate was 58%; 10.7% of patients initially treated as outpatients were secondarily hospitalized within 7 days. Median age of admitted patients was 63 years; median eCURB predicted mortality was 2.65% (mean 6.8%) versus 46 years and 0.93% for outpatients. The 18 emergency physicians (average age 44.9 [standard deviation 7.6] years; years in practice 8.4 [standard deviation 6.9]) objectively calculated and documented illness severity in 2.7% of patients. Observed 30-day mortality for inpatients was 6.8% (outpatient mortality 0.34%) and decreased over time. Individual physician admission rates ranged from 38% to 79%, with variability not explained by illness severity, time of day, day of week, resident care in conjunction with an attending physician, or patient or physician demographics. Higher hospitalization rates were not associated with reduced mortality or fewer secondary hospital admissions.

CONCLUSION

We observed a 2-fold difference in pneumonia hospitalization rates among emergency physicians, unexplained by objective data.

摘要

研究目的

我们考察了急诊医师对肺炎患者住院率的差异,以及这种差异对临床结果的影响。

方法

我们研究了 1996 年至 2006 年间在 LDS 医院急诊科就诊的 2069 例年龄在 18 岁及以上的社区获得性肺炎患者,这些患者的诊断通过国际疾病分类,第九修订版编码和相符的胸部 X 线片确定。我们从电子病历中提取生命体征、实验室和影像学结果、住院情况和结果。我们将“低严重度”定义为 PaO(2)/FiO(2) 比值大于或等于 280mmHg,使用连续和加权元素的电子版本 CURB-65(eCURB)预测死亡率小于 5%,以及不符合 2007 年美国传染病学会-美国胸科学会严重肺炎次要标准的小于 3 项。我们调整了住院决策和结果,以考虑疾病严重程度和患者人口统计学特征。

结果

初始住院率为 58%;10.7%的初始门诊治疗患者在 7 天内再次住院。住院患者的中位年龄为 63 岁;中位 eCURB 预测死亡率为 2.65%(平均 6.8%),而门诊患者的中位年龄为 46 岁,eCURB 预测死亡率为 0.93%。18 名急诊医师(平均年龄 44.9[标准差 7.6]岁;行医年限 8.4[标准差 6.9]年)客观地计算和记录了 2.7%的患者的疾病严重程度。住院患者 30 天死亡率为 6.8%(门诊患者死亡率为 0.34%),且随时间推移而降低。个别医师的入院率从 38%到 79%不等,这种差异不能用疾病严重程度、一天中的时间、一周中的天数、住院医师与主治医生一起护理、患者或医生的人口统计学特征来解释。较高的住院率与死亡率降低或较少的二次住院无关。

结论

我们观察到急诊医师对肺炎患者的住院率存在 2 倍的差异,这种差异无法用客观数据解释。

相似文献

1
Hospital admission decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: variability among physicians in an emergency department.社区获得性肺炎患者住院决策:急诊科医生之间的差异。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;59(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.032. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
2
Impact of an Electronic Clinical Decision Support Tool for Emergency Department Patients With Pneumonia.电子临床决策支持工具对急诊科肺炎患者的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;66(5):511-20. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
3
Understanding physician adherence with a pneumonia practice guideline: effects of patient, system, and physician factors.了解医生对肺炎诊疗指南的依从性:患者、系统及医生因素的影响
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jan 10;160(1):98-104. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.1.98.
4
Significance of the physician's and the patient's sex in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎住院患者中医生和患者性别意义。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2021 Jul;53(7):538-545. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2021.1900906. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
5
Utility of community-acquired pneumonia severity scores in guiding disposition from the emergency department: Intensive care or short-stay unit?社区获得性肺炎严重程度评分在指导急诊科患者分流中的作用:重症监护还是短期留观病房?
Emerg Med Australas. 2018 Aug;30(4):538-546. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12947. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
6
[Recommendations for the care of patients with community-acquired pneumonia in the Emergency Department].[急诊科社区获得性肺炎患者的护理建议]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2018 Apr;31(2):186-202. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
7
Validation of the 2001 American Thoracic Society criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia.2001年美国胸科学会重症社区获得性肺炎标准的验证
Crit Care Med. 2004 Dec;32(12):2398-402. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000147443.38234.d2.
8
[Hospital admission, duration of stay and mortality in community-acquired pneumonia in an acute care hospital. Correlation between a pneumonia prognosis index and conventional clinical criteria for assessing severity].[急性护理医院中社区获得性肺炎的住院情况、住院时长及死亡率。肺炎预后指数与评估严重程度的传统临床标准之间的相关性]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2004 Feb;22(2):64-9. doi: 10.1016/s0213-005x(04)73036-0.
9
Admission via the emergency department in relation to mortality of adults hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia: an analysis of the British Thoracic Society national community-acquired pneumonia audit.因社区获得性肺炎住院的成年人死亡率与通过急诊科入院的关系:英国胸科学会全国社区获得性肺炎审计分析
Emerg Med J. 2015 Jan;32(1):55-9. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203494. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
10
Comparison of processes and outcomes of pneumonia care between hospitalists and community-based primary care physicians.住院医师与社区基层医疗医生在肺炎治疗过程及结果方面的比较。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 Oct;77(10):1053-8. doi: 10.4065/77.10.1053.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency planned re-infusion therapy and hospitalisation for community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective case-control study.社区获得性肺炎的紧急计划性再输注治疗与住院治疗:一项回顾性病例对照研究
J Glob Health. 2025 Jan 31;15:04044. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04044.
2
Hospitalization prediction from the emergency department using computer vision AI with short patient video clips.利用计算机视觉人工智能和患者短视频片段从急诊科进行住院预测。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Dec 19;7(1):371. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01375-3.
3
The social experience of uncertainty: a qualitative analysis of emergency department care for suspected pneumonia for the design of decision support.不确定性的社会体验:针对疑似肺炎的急诊科护理进行决策支持设计的定性分析
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02805-8.
4
Impact of Outdoor Air Pollutants Exposure on the Severity and Outcomes of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Gabes Region, Tunisia.突尼斯加贝斯地区室外空气污染物暴露对社区获得性肺炎严重程度及预后的影响
Cureus. 2024 Aug 10;16(8):e66578. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66578. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Prognostic clinical decision support for pneumonia in the emergency department: A randomized trial.急诊科肺炎的预后临床决策支持:一项随机试验。
J Hosp Med. 2024 Sep;19(9):802-811. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13391. Epub 2024 May 26.
6
Association of physiological stress markers at the emergency department to readmission and death within 90 days: a prospective observational study.急诊科生理应激标志物与 90 天内再入院和死亡的相关性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Ups J Med Sci. 2023 May 3;128. doi: 10.48101/ujms.v128.9300. eCollection 2023.
7
Hospital admission decisions for older Veterans with community-onset pneumonia: An analysis of 118 U.S. Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.老年社区获得性肺炎退伍军人的住院决策:对 118 家美国退伍军人事务医疗中心的分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;30(4):398-409. doi: 10.1111/acem.14655.
8
A Pragmatic, Stepped-Wedge, Cluster-controlled Clinical Trial of Real-Time Pneumonia Clinical Decision Support.一项关于实时肺炎临床决策支持的实用、阶梯式楔形、整群对照临床试验。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Jun 1;205(11):1330-1336. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202109-2092OC.
9
Predictive Value of Clinician "Gestalt" in Pediatric Community-Acquired Pneumonia.临床医生“整体观”在儿科社区获得性肺炎中的预测价值。
Pediatrics. 2021 May;147(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-041582.
10
Pneumonia Severity in Children: Utility of Procalcitonin in Risk Stratification.儿童肺炎严重程度:降钙素原在风险分层中的应用。
Hosp Pediatr. 2021 Mar;11(3):215-222. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-001842. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

本文引用的文献

1
CURB-65 pneumonia severity assessment adapted for electronic decision support.CURB-65 肺炎严重程度评估适用于电子决策支持。
Chest. 2011 Jul;140(1):156-163. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1296. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
2
Reasons why emergency department providers do not rely on the pneumonia severity index to determine the initial site of treatment for patients with pneumonia.急诊科医生不依据肺炎严重指数决定肺炎患者初始治疗地点的原因。
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Nov 15;49(10):e100-8. doi: 10.1086/644741.
3
Validation of the Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society 2007 guidelines for severe community-acquired pneumonia.美国传染病学会/美国胸科学会2007年重症社区获得性肺炎指南的验证
Crit Care Med. 2009 Dec;37(12):3010-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b030d9.
4
A teaching hospital's experience applying the Pneumonia Severity Index and antibiotic guidelines in the management of community-acquired pneumonia.一家教学医院在应用肺炎严重程度指数和抗生素指南管理社区获得性肺炎方面的经验。
Respirology. 2007 Sep;12(5):754-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2007.01121.x.
5
Comparison of outcomes for low-risk outpatients and inpatients with pneumonia: A propensity-adjusted analysis.低风险门诊肺炎患者与住院肺炎患者的结局比较:一项倾向调整分析。
Chest. 2007 Feb;131(2):480-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-1393.
6
Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.美国感染病学会/美国胸科学会关于成人社区获得性肺炎管理的共识指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S27-72. doi: 10.1086/511159.
7
Validation of a predictive rule for the management of community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎管理预测规则的验证
Eur Respir J. 2006 Jan;27(1):151-7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00062505.
8
Effect of increasing the intensity of implementing pneumonia guidelines: a randomized, controlled trial.提高肺炎指南实施强度的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Dec 20;143(12):881-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-12-200512200-00006.
9
Accuracy of administrative data for identifying patients with pneumonia.用于识别肺炎患者的管理数据的准确性。
Am J Med Qual. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(6):319-28. doi: 10.1177/1062860605280358.
10
Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia.成人医院获得性肺炎、呼吸机相关性肺炎和医疗保健相关性肺炎管理指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb 15;171(4):388-416. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200405-644ST.