Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2011 Sep;26(9):1115-23. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.9.1115. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
Neonatal mortality rate (NMR) and infant mortality rate (IMR) are two of the most important indices reflecting the level of public health of a country. In this review, we investigated changes in NMR and IMR in Korea and compared the results with those of Japan, USA, and OECD nations. During the past 20 yr, NMR and IMR have lowered remarkably from 6.6 and 9.9 in 1993 to 1.7 and 3.2 in 2009, respectively, in Korea. It is an impressive finding that Korean IMR (3.2 in 2009) is lower than the average of OECD nations (4.7 in 2008), and USA (6.3 in 2009), although higher than Japanese IMR (2.8 in 2009). The proportion of NMR among the IMR calculation decreased from 66.7% in 1993 to 53.1% in 2009. The reason the value of Korea was higher than Japan but lower than USA was speculated to be an aspect of the health care service system. Several suggestions in perinatal, neonatal and infantile health care such as establishment of perinatal care center, research network system, regionalization, and new policies for care of pre-term and high risk pregnancy, are elucidated to achieve further improvement on NMR and IMR in Korea.
新生儿死亡率 (NMR) 和婴儿死亡率 (IMR) 是反映一个国家公共卫生水平的两个最重要指标。在本综述中,我们调查了韩国 NMR 和 IMR 的变化,并将结果与日本、美国和经合组织国家进行了比较。在过去的 20 年中,NMR 和 IMR 显著下降,从 1993 年的 6.6 和 9.9 分别降至 2009 年的 1.7 和 3.2。令人印象深刻的是,韩国的 IMR(2009 年为 3.2)低于经合组织国家(2008 年为 4.7)和美国(2009 年为 6.3)的平均水平,尽管高于日本的 IMR(2009 年为 2.8)。NMR 在 IMR 计算中的比例从 1993 年的 66.7%下降到 2009 年的 53.1%。韩国的数值高于日本但低于美国的原因被推测是医疗保健服务系统的一个方面。为了进一步提高韩国的 NMR 和 IMR,提出了一些围产期、新生儿和婴幼儿保健方面的建议,如建立围产期保健中心、研究网络系统、区域化以及为早产儿和高危妊娠提供新的护理政策。