Suppr超能文献

超薄型与标准型结肠镜在盲肠插管率及患者耐受性方面的随机比较。

A randomized comparison of ultrathin and standard colonoscope in cecal intubation rate and patient tolerance.

机构信息

Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):484-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.032. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complete colonoscopy examination cannot be performed in as many as 10% of cases. The new 9.2-mm ultrathin colonoscope (UTC) with an extra bending section may improve procedure tolerance and allow improvement in colonoscopy completion rate compared with a 12.9-mm standard colonoscope (SC).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of the 9.2-mm UTC with that of the 12.9-mm SC.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Academic endoscopic unit.

PATIENTS

Subjects 18 years and older undergoing their first colonoscopy.

INTERVENTION

Subjects were randomized to either the UTC or SC group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

First and rescue successful cecal intubation rates, subject satisfaction scores, and sedation requirements were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 1121 patients (56% women, mean age 53.6 years) were randomized to the UTC group (n = 551) or the SC group (n = 570). There was no statistically significant difference in the first successful cecal intubation rate between the UTC and SC groups (98.9% vs 97.4%, P = .057). The mean (standard deviation) dose of midazolam and pethidine used was significantly lower in the UTC group (2.65 [0.65] mg vs 2.82 [0.85] mg, P < .001 and 27.6 [7.4] mg vs 29.7 [9.6] mg, P < .001, respectively). The mean (standard deviation) patient satisfaction score was similar between groups (6.99 [2.89] vs 7.04 [3.06], P = .762). Of the 21 patients (1.9%) with an incomplete initial colonoscopy (6 in the UTC group and 15 in the SC group), all 6 in the UTC group had their procedure completed with an SC. Eleven of 15 patients in the SC group had their procedures completed with a UTC in the same session.

LIMITATIONS

Low failure rate may mask any difference between the 2 colonoscopes as a rescue instrument.

CONCLUSIONS

The 9.2-mm UTC has performance characteristics similar to those of an SC in Chinese subjects undergoing their first colonoscopy performed by experienced and trainee endoscopists. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01142167.).

摘要

背景

多达 10%的病例无法进行完整的结肠镜检查。新的 9.2mm 超微型结肠镜(UTC)具有额外的弯曲部分,与 12.9mm 标准结肠镜(SC)相比,可能会提高手术耐受性并提高结肠镜检查完成率。

目的

比较 9.2mm UTC 与 12.9mm SC 的性能。

设计

前瞻性、随机、对照试验。

地点

学术内镜单位。

患者

年龄在 18 岁及以上,首次接受结肠镜检查的患者。

干预

患者随机分为 UTC 组或 SC 组。

主要观察指标

首次和抢救成功盲肠插管率、患者满意度评分和镇静需求。

结果

共 1121 例患者(56%为女性,平均年龄 53.6 岁)被随机分为 UTC 组(n=551)或 SC 组(n=570)。UTC 组和 SC 组首次盲肠插管成功率无统计学差异(98.9% vs 97.4%,P=0.057)。UTC 组咪达唑仑和派替啶的平均(标准差)剂量明显低于 SC 组(2.65[0.65]mg 与 2.82[0.85]mg,P<0.001;27.6[7.4]mg 与 29.7[9.6]mg,P<0.001)。两组患者满意度评分相似(6.99[2.89]与 7.04[3.06],P=0.762)。21 例(1.9%)初始结肠镜检查不全的患者(UTC 组 6 例,SC 组 15 例)中,UTC 组 6 例均采用 SC 完成检查。SC 组 15 例患者中有 11 例在同一时段内采用 UTC 完成检查。

局限性

低失败率可能掩盖了两种结肠镜在作为抢救仪器时的任何差异。

结论

在中国首次接受经验丰富和受训内镜医师进行结肠镜检查的患者中,9.2mm UTC 的性能特征与 SC 相似。(临床试验注册号:NCT01142167.)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验