Partapsingh V A, Maharaj R G, Rawlins J M
Ste. Madeleine Health Centre, South-West Regional Health Authority, Trinidad and Tobago.
J Negat Results Biomed. 2011 Oct 11;10:13. doi: 10.1186/1477-5751-10-13.
To improve glycaemic control among Type 2 diabetics using patient-physician consultations guided by the Stages of Change (SOC) model.
A randomised trial was conducted. After ensuring concealment of allocation, Type 2 diabetics were randomly assigned to receive the intervention or the control. The intervention consisted of identifying each patient's Stage of Change for managing their diabetes by diet, exercise and medications, and applying personalised, stage-specific care during the patient-physician consultations based on the SOC model. Patients in the control group received routine care. The variables of interest were effect on glycaemic control (measured by the difference in HbA1c levels) and patients' readiness to change (measured by identifying patients' SOC for managing their diabetes by diet, exercise and medications).
Participants were primarily over age 50, male and Indo-Trinidadian. Most had received only a primary school education and over 65% had a monthly income of $320 USD/month or less. Sixty-one Type 2 diabetics participated in each arm. Three patients were lost to follow-up in the intervention arm. After 48 weeks, there was an overall increase in HbA1c of 0.52% (SE 0.17) and 1.09% (SE 0.18) for both the intervention and control groups respectively. There was a relative reduction in HbA1c of 0.57% (95% CI 0.07, 1.07) with the intervention group compared to the control (p = 0.025). For exercise and diet there was an overall tendency for participants in the intervention arm to move to a more favourable SOC, but little change was noted with regards medication use.
The result suggests a tendency to a worsening of glycaemic control in this population despite adopting more favourable SOC for diet and exercise. We hypothesized that harsh social conditions prevailing at the time of the study overrode the clinical intervention.
采用基于行为改变阶段(SOC)模型的医患咨询,改善2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制。
进行了一项随机试验。在确保分配隐藏后,将2型糖尿病患者随机分配接受干预或对照。干预包括确定每位患者通过饮食、运动和药物管理糖尿病的行为改变阶段,并在医患咨询期间根据SOC模型提供个性化的、针对特定阶段的护理。对照组患者接受常规护理。感兴趣的变量是对血糖控制的影响(通过糖化血红蛋白水平的差异衡量)和患者的改变意愿(通过确定患者通过饮食、运动和药物管理糖尿病的行为改变阶段衡量)。
参与者主要为50岁以上的男性和印度裔特立尼达人。大多数人仅接受过小学教育,超过65%的人月收入为320美元或更低。每组有61名2型糖尿病患者参与。干预组有3名患者失访。48周后,干预组和对照组的糖化血红蛋白总体分别增加了0.52%(标准误0.17)和1.09%(标准误0.18)。与对照组相比,干预组的糖化血红蛋白相对降低了0.57%(95%可信区间0.07,1.07)(p = 0.025)。对于运动和饮食,干预组的参与者总体上有转向更有利的行为改变阶段的趋势,但在药物使用方面变化不大。
结果表明,尽管在饮食和运动方面采用了更有利的行为改变阶段,但该人群的血糖控制仍有恶化的趋势。我们推测,研究期间普遍存在的恶劣社会状况压倒了临床干预。