Suppr超能文献

长期补充共轭亚油酸 (CLA) 对超重和肥胖个体身体成分的影响:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

The efficacy of long-term conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) supplementation on body composition in overweight and obese individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

机构信息

Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Nutr. 2012 Mar;51(2):127-34. doi: 10.1007/s00394-011-0253-9. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Numerous supplements containing conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) are presently being promoted for body weight reduction. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence for or against the long-term efficacy of CLA.

METHODS

Electronic searches were conducted to identify relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs). No restrictions in age, time, or language were imposed. Studies had to be at least 6 months in duration. Three reviewers independently determined the eligibility of studies. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the reporting quality of all RCTs.

RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs were identified, and seven were included. Four of the included RCTs had serious flaws in the reporting of their methodology. A meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in weight loss favouring CLA over placebo (mean difference: -0.70 kg; 95% confidence interval: -1.09, -0.32). Our meta-analysis also revealed a small significant difference in fat loss favouring CLA over placebo (MD: -1.33 kg; 95% CI: -1.79, -0.86; I (2) = 54%). The magnitude of these effects is small, and the clinical relevance is uncertain. Adverse events included constipation, diarrhea, and soft stools.

CONCLUSION

The evidence from RCTs does not convincingly show that CLA intake generates any clinically relevant effects on body composition on the long term.

摘要

简介

目前有许多含有共轭亚油酸 (CLA) 的补充剂被宣传用于减肥。本系统评价旨在评估 CLA 长期疗效的证据。

方法

电子检索以确定相关的随机临床试验 (RCT)。对年龄、时间或语言没有限制。研究必须持续至少 6 个月。三名评审员独立确定研究的合格性。两名评审员独立提取数据并评估所有 RCT 的报告质量。

结果

确定了 15 项 RCT,其中 7 项被纳入。纳入的 RCT 中有 4 项在报告方法方面存在严重缺陷。荟萃分析显示,CLA 在体重减轻方面优于安慰剂(平均差异:-0.70 公斤;95%置信区间:-1.09,-0.32)。我们的荟萃分析还显示,CLA 在脂肪减少方面优于安慰剂(MD:-1.33 公斤;95% CI:-1.79,-0.86;I (2) = 54%)。这些效果的幅度很小,临床相关性不确定。不良反应包括便秘、腹泻和软便。

结论

来自 RCT 的证据并未令人信服地表明 CLA 摄入在长期内对身体成分产生任何临床相关影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验