Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
PLoS Med. 2011 Oct;8(10):e1001103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001103. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
In an emerging influenza pandemic, estimating severity (the probability of a severe outcome, such as hospitalization, if infected) is a public health priority. As many influenza infections are subclinical, sero-surveillance is needed to allow reliable real-time estimates of infection attack rate (IAR) and severity.
We tested 14,766 sera collected during the first wave of the 2009 pandemic in Hong Kong using viral microneutralization. We estimated IAR and infection-hospitalization probability (IHP) from the serial cross-sectional serologic data and hospitalization data. Had our serologic data been available weekly in real time, we would have obtained reliable IHP estimates 1 wk after, 1-2 wk before, and 3 wk after epidemic peak for individuals aged 5-14 y, 15-29 y, and 30-59 y. The ratio of IAR to pre-existing seroprevalence, which decreased with age, was a major determinant for the timeliness of reliable estimates. If we began sero-surveillance 3 wk after community transmission was confirmed, with 150, 350, and 500 specimens per week for individuals aged 5-14 y, 15-19 y, and 20-29 y, respectively, we would have obtained reliable IHP estimates for these age groups 4 wk before the peak. For 30-59 y olds, even 800 specimens per week would not have generated reliable estimates until the peak because the ratio of IAR to pre-existing seroprevalence for this age group was low. The performance of serial cross-sectional sero-surveillance substantially deteriorates if test specificity is not near 100% or pre-existing seroprevalence is not near zero. These potential limitations could be mitigated by choosing a higher titer cutoff for seropositivity. If the epidemic doubling time is longer than 6 d, then serial cross-sectional sero-surveillance with 300 specimens per week would yield reliable estimates when IAR reaches around 6%-10%.
Serial cross-sectional serologic data together with clinical surveillance data can allow reliable real-time estimates of IAR and severity in an emerging pandemic. Sero-surveillance for pandemics should be considered.
在新发流感大流行期间,评估严重程度(如果感染,住院等严重后果的概率)是公共卫生的当务之急。由于许多流感感染是亚临床的,因此需要血清学监测,以允许对感染攻击率(IAR)和严重程度进行可靠的实时估计。
我们使用病毒微量中和法检测了 2009 年大流行期间在香港收集的 14766 份血清。我们从血清学数据和住院数据的连续横断面血清学数据中估计了 IAR 和感染住院概率(IHP)。如果我们的血清学数据每周实时提供,那么我们将能够可靠地获得 5-14 岁,15-29 岁和 30-59 岁人群的 IHP 估计值,在流行高峰期后 1 周,流行高峰期前 1-2 周和流行高峰期后 3 周。与年龄相关的 IAR 与预先存在的血清阳性率之比是可靠估计及时性的主要决定因素。如果我们在社区传播确认后 3 周开始血清学监测,每周分别为 5-14 岁,15-19 岁和 20-29 岁人群收集 150、350 和 500 份标本,则我们将能够在高峰期前 4 周为这些年龄组获得可靠的 IHP 估计值。对于 30-59 岁的人,即使每周收集 800 份标本,直到高峰期才能得出可靠的估计值,因为该年龄组的 IAR 与预先存在的血清阳性率之比很低。如果测试特异性不是接近 100%或预先存在的血清阳性率不是接近零,则连续横断面血清学监测的性能会大大恶化。通过选择更高的血清阳性截断值可以减轻这些潜在的局限性。如果流行倍增时间长于 6 天,则每周 300 个标本的连续横断面血清学监测将在 IAR 达到 6%-10%左右时产生可靠的估计值。
连续横断面血清学数据与临床监测数据相结合,可以在新发大流行期间对 IAR 和严重程度进行可靠的实时估计。应考虑对大流行进行血清学监测。