Suppr超能文献

用于确定 SARS-CoV-2 传播和免疫的血清流行病学研究设计。

Seroepidemiologic Study Designs for Determining SARS-COV-2 Transmission and Immunity.

出版信息

Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;26(9):1978-1986. doi: 10.3201/eid2609.201840. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

Abstract

Serologic studies are crucial for clarifying dynamics of the coronavirus disease pandemic. Past work on serologic studies (e.g., during influenza pandemics) has made relevant contributions, but specific conditions of the current situation require adaptation. Although detection of antibodies to measure exposure, immunity, or both seems straightforward conceptually, numerous challenges exist in terms of sample collection, what the presence of antibodies actually means, and appropriate analysis and interpretation to account for test accuracy and sampling biases. Successful deployment of serologic studies depends on type and performance of serologic tests, population studied, use of adequate study designs, and appropriate analysis and interpretation of data. We highlight key questions that serologic studies can help answer at different times, review strengths and limitations of different assay types and study designs, and discuss methods for rapid sharing and analysis of serologic data to determine global transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

摘要

血清学研究对于阐明冠状病毒病大流行的动态至关重要。过去关于血清学研究的工作(例如,在流感大流行期间)做出了相关贡献,但当前情况的具体条件需要进行调整。尽管从概念上讲,检测抗体以衡量暴露、免疫或两者的情况似乎很简单,但在样本采集、抗体的实际含义以及适当的分析和解释以考虑测试准确性和采样偏差方面存在诸多挑战。血清学研究的成功部署取决于血清学检测的类型和性能、研究人群、适当的研究设计以及对数据的适当分析和解释。我们重点介绍了血清学研究可以在不同时间帮助回答的关键问题,回顾了不同检测类型和研究设计的优缺点,并讨论了快速共享和分析血清学数据的方法,以确定严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2 的全球传播情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验