• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Physicians' perceptions of the type 2 diabetes multi-disciplinary treatment team: a qualitative study.医生对 2 型糖尿病多学科治疗团队的看法:一项定性研究。
Diabetes Educ. 2011 Nov-Dec;37(6):794-800. doi: 10.1177/0145721711423320. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
2
A qualitative study of perceived responsibility and self-blame in type 2 diabetes: reflections of physicians and patients.一项关于 2 型糖尿病患者感知责任和自责的定性研究:医生和患者的反思。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Sep;27(9):1180-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2070-0. Epub 2012 May 2.
3
Interprofessional collaboration in diabetes care: perceptions of family physicians practicing in or not in a primary health care team.糖尿病护理中的跨专业合作:在或不在基层医疗团队中执业的家庭医生的看法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Mar 13;20(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0932-9.
4
Barriers and facilitators to self-care communication during medical appointments in the United States for adults with type 2 diabetes.美国2型糖尿病成年患者在就医过程中自我护理沟通的障碍与促进因素
Chronic Illn. 2014 Dec;10(4):303-13. doi: 10.1177/1742395314525647. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
5
Multidisciplinary coordinated care for Type 2 diabetes: A qualitative analysis of patient perspectives.2型糖尿病的多学科协调护理:对患者观点的定性分析。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2018 Jun;12(3):218-223. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
Cultural and Social Challenges of Diabetes Self-Management Education Through Physicians' Voices.透过医生视角看糖尿病自我管理教育的文化与社会挑战
WMJ. 2018 Dec;117(5):219-223.
7
Factors for Supporting Primary Care Physician Engagement With Patient Apps for Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management That Link to Primary Care: Interview Study.支持初级保健医生参与与初级保健相关的 2 型糖尿病自我管理患者应用程序的因素:访谈研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 16;7(1):e11885. doi: 10.2196/11885.
8
GPs' perspectives of type 2 diabetes patients' adherence to treatment: A qualitative analysis of barriers and solutions.全科医生对2型糖尿病患者治疗依从性的看法:障碍与解决方案的定性分析
BMC Fam Pract. 2005 May 12;6(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-20.
9
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?360度反馈调查结果与患者满意度指标有关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3.
10
Transition from specialist to primary diabetes care: a qualitative study of perspectives of primary care physicians.从专科糖尿病护理向初级糖尿病护理的转变:一项关于初级保健医生观点的定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Jun 6;10:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-39.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived benefits and barriers of multidisciplinary teams in the management of diabetes and comorbidities among physicians: A qualitative double-center study.医生对多学科团队在糖尿病及合并症管理中的感知益处与障碍:一项双中心定性研究
J Multimorb Comorb. 2025 Apr 24;15:26335565251336425. doi: 10.1177/26335565251336425. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Physicians' Perspectives on Health-Related Quality of Life and Mental Health Aspects of People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.医生对2型糖尿病患者健康相关生活质量和心理健康状况的看法:沙特阿拉伯吉达的一项横断面研究
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024 Nov 15;17:4287-4297. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S491491. eCollection 2024.
3
A practical evidence-based approach to management of type 2 diabetes in children and young people (CYP): UK consensus.儿童和青少年 2 型糖尿病管理的实用循证方法:英国共识。
BMC Med. 2024 Apr 2;22(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03349-4.
4
Medication Errors and Type 2 Diabetes Management: A Qualitative Exploration of Physicians' Perceptions, Experiences and Expectations From Quetta City, Pakistan.用药错误与2型糖尿病管理:对巴基斯坦奎达市医生认知、经验及期望的质性探索
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 28;9:846530. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.846530. eCollection 2022.
5
Population Health Management in Diabetes Care: Combining Clinical Audit, Risk Stratification, and Multidisciplinary Virtual Clinics in a Community Setting to Improve Diabetes Care in a Geographically Defined Population. An Integrated Diabetes Care Pilot in the North East Locality, Oxfordshire, UK.糖尿病护理中的人群健康管理:在社区环境中结合临床审计、风险分层和多学科虚拟诊所,以改善特定地理区域人群的糖尿病护理。英国牛津郡东北部地区的综合糖尿病护理试点项目。
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Nov 2;20(4):21. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5177.
6
How to Manage Diversity and Enhance Team Performance: Evidence from Online Doctor Teams in China.如何管理多样性并提高团队绩效:来自中国在线医生团队的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 19;17(1):48. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010048.
7
Survey evaluation of in-hospital diabetes seminars provided by medical professionals, for medical professionals.针对医学专业人员开展的、由医学专业人员提供的院内糖尿病研讨会的调查评估
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Jun 7;12:445-452. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S209576. eCollection 2019.
8
Perceptions of insulin use in type 2 diabetes in primary care: a thematic synthesis.基层医疗中2型糖尿病患者对胰岛素使用的认知:一项主题综合分析
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 22;19(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0753-2.
9
The interdisciplinary team in type 2 diabetes management: Challenges and best practice solutions from real-world scenarios.2型糖尿病管理中的跨学科团队:来自实际场景的挑战与最佳实践解决方案
J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2016 Dec 9;7:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcte.2016.12.001. eCollection 2017 Mar.
10
Six impossible things before breakfast: examining diabetes self-care.早餐前的六件不可能之事:审视糖尿病自我护理
Diabetes Spectr. 2015 May;28(2):146-51. doi: 10.2337/diaspect.28.2.146.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding physicians' challenges when treating type 2 diabetic patients' social and emotional difficulties: a qualitative study.理解医生在治疗 2 型糖尿病患者社会和情感困难时所面临的挑战:一项定性研究。
Diabetes Care. 2011 May;34(5):1086-8. doi: 10.2337/dc10-2298. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
2
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2011 年》
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc11-S011.
3
The well-being and treatment satisfaction of diabetic patients in primary care.基层医疗中糖尿病患者的健康和治疗满意度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Jul 13;8:67. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-67.
4
Initiating insulin as part of the Treating To Target in Type 2 Diabetes (4-T) trial: an interview study of patients' and health professionals' experiences.在 2 型糖尿病治疗目标 (4-T) 试验中启动胰岛素治疗:患者和卫生专业人员经验的访谈研究。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Oct;33(10):2178-80. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0494. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
5
Feasibility and effectiveness of a disease and care management model in the primary health care system for patients with heart failure and diabetes (Project Leonardo).心力衰竭和糖尿病患者初级卫生保健系统中疾病与护理管理模式的可行性和有效性(莱昂纳多项目)
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010 May 6;6:297-305. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s9252.
6
Characteristics, cardiovascular comorbidity and medicines management in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD: results of the IRIDIEM study.2 型糖尿病合并 CKD 患者的特征、心血管合并症及药物治疗管理:IRIDIEM 研究结果。
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2010;33(2):119-28. doi: 10.1159/000313595. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
7
Improving chronic care of type 2 diabetes using teams of interprofessional learners.利用跨专业学习者团队改善2型糖尿病的慢性病护理。
Acad Med. 2009 Nov;84(11):1540-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bb2845.
8
Interdisciplinary diabetes care teams operating on the interface between primary and specialty care are associated with improved outcomes of care: findings from the Leuven Diabetes Project.跨学科的糖尿病护理团队在初级保健和专科保健之间运作,与改善护理结果相关:来自鲁汶糖尿病项目的发现。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct 7;9:179. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-179.
9
Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions.患者赋权:误解与误区。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jun;79(3):277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.025. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
10
The increasing number of clinical items addressed during the time of adult primary care visits.成人初级保健就诊期间涉及的临床项目数量不断增加。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec;23(12):2058-65. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0805-8. Epub 2008 Oct 2.

医生对 2 型糖尿病多学科治疗团队的看法:一项定性研究。

Physicians' perceptions of the type 2 diabetes multi-disciplinary treatment team: a qualitative study.

机构信息

The Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Ritholz, Dr Beverly, Dr Abrahamson, Ms Brooks, Ms. Hultgren, and Dr Weinger)

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr. Ritholz, Dr. Beverly, Dr. Abrahamson, and Dr Weinger)

出版信息

Diabetes Educ. 2011 Nov-Dec;37(6):794-800. doi: 10.1177/0145721711423320. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1177/0145721711423320
PMID:22002972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3707496/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore physicians' perceptions of the multidisciplinary type 2 diabetes treatment team.

METHODS

Nineteen physicians (74% endocrinologists; 26% primary care) participated in semistructured interviews. Audiorecorded data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using thematic analysis and NVivo 8 software.

RESULTS

Physicians considered the multidisciplinary team, including a physician and diabetes educator, as very important to diabetes treatment. Participants described how diabetes, with its many comorbidities and challenging lifestyle recommendations, is difficult for any single physician to treat. They further described how the team's diverse staff offers complementary skills and more contact time for assessment and treatment of patients, developing treatment relationships, and supporting patients in learning diabetes self-care. Physicians stressed the necessity of regular and ongoing communication among team members to ensure patients receive consistent information, and some reported that institutional factors interfere with intra-team communication. They also expressed concerns about the team approach in relation to individualized treatment and patients' reluctance to see multiple providers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights physicians' positive perceptions of and concerns about the type 2 diabetes multidisciplinary team. Further study of diabetes educators' and patients' perceptions of the team approach is needed.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨医生对 2 型糖尿病多学科治疗团队的看法。

方法

19 名医生(74%为内分泌科医生;26%为初级保健医生)参与了半结构化访谈。使用主题分析和 NVivo 8 软件对录音数据进行转录、编码和分析。

结果

医生认为包括医生和糖尿病教育者在内的多学科团队对于糖尿病治疗非常重要。参与者描述了糖尿病及其多种合并症和具有挑战性的生活方式建议,使得任何一位医生都难以单独进行治疗。他们进一步描述了团队多样化的工作人员如何提供互补的技能和更多的时间来评估和治疗患者,建立治疗关系,并支持患者学习糖尿病自我护理。医生强调团队成员之间定期和持续沟通的必要性,以确保患者获得一致的信息,一些医生报告说机构因素干扰了团队内部的沟通。他们还对团队方法在个体化治疗方面以及患者不愿意看多个医生的问题表示担忧。

结论

本研究强调了医生对 2 型糖尿病多学科团队的积极看法和担忧。需要进一步研究糖尿病教育者和患者对团队方法的看法。